Executive Action (1973) available for free on Youtube. This film is a bit low budget but explosive for what it revealed/suggested about the actual operation that murdered JFK. This was banned from American cinemas until the late 1980s due to bad press (going against the Warren narrative) when it finally started airing on TV.




PROLOGUE: "Before his death, former president Lyndon B. Johnson gave a three-hour filmed interview to a well-known television commentator. On May 2, 1970, when this interview was shown on a national television network, it included the message that certain material had been deleted at President Johnson's insistence. It has been revealed that in the censored section, Johnson had expressed misgivings about the findings that Lee Harvey Oswald had acted alone, and that in fact, he suspected that a conspiracy had been involved in the assassination of John F. Kennedy."

An additional written prologue appears after the opening credits: "Although much of this film is fiction, much of it is also based on documented historical fact. Did the conspiracy we describe actually exist? We do not know. We merely suggest that it could have existed."

EPILOGUE: "In the three years after the murders of President Kennedy and Lee Harvey Oswald, eighteen material witnesses died... six by gunfire, three in motor accidents, two by suicide, one from a cut throat, one from a karate chop to the neck, three from heart attacks and two from natural causes. An actuary, engaged by the Sunday London Times concluded that on November 22, 1963, the odds against these witnesses being dead by February, 1967 were one hundred thousand trillion to one."

Dr. Joseph Buttigieg (May 20, 1947 – January 27, 2019), a Maltese-American Marxist, the father of Pete Buttigieg, was an expert on the Marxist philosopher Antonio Gramsci. He emphasized forging alliances across diverse societal groups to achieve political goals.



ChatGPT's perception of how Gramsci's theories may have helped shaped Pete's career:

ChatGPT prompt: Pete Buttigieg's dad was a professor of Marxism. What lessons did he likely teach Pete to become an effective politician and cabinet secretary?

1. Critical Thinking and Analytical Skills: Growing up in an environment rich with academic discourse likely honed Pete's ability to think critically and analytically. This skill is essential for navigating complex political landscapes and formulating policies that address multifaceted issues.

2. Understanding of Power Dynamics: Marxist theory extensively analyzes power structures and class relations. Pete may have developed a nuanced understanding of how power operates within society, which can be crucial in political strategy and policy-making.

3. Appreciation for Historical Context: Gramsci's work emphasizes the importance of historical context in understanding social and political phenomena. This perspective can help a politician consider the broader implications of their actions and policies, and make more informed decisions.

4. Communication and Persuasion: Gramsci's concept of cultural hegemony underscores the importance of winning hearts and minds to effect change. Pete's ability to communicate effectively and connect with diverse groups of people might be rooted in this understanding of the power of persuasion.

5. Focus on Education and Knowledge: Joseph Buttigieg’s emphasis on education likely instilled in Pete a respect for knowledge and expertise. This is reflected in Pete’s approach to policy, where he often relies on data and expert opinion to inform his decisions.

6. Ethics and Social Justice: While Pete Buttigieg’s policies are more centrist, the ethical considerations and focus on social justice prevalent in Marxist thought might have influenced his commitment to public service and addressing inequalities.

7. Resilience and Adaptability: Gramsci wrote about the importance of resilience in the face of adversity. Pete’s career, including his military service and his political campaigns, demonstrates a level of resilience and adaptability that may be partly inspired by these ideas.

Though Pete Buttigieg's political stance is distinct from his father's Marxist scholarship, the intellectual environment he grew up in likely provided him with valuable tools and perspectives that have contributed to his effectiveness in public service.

Some excerpts of "Dive Deeper":

Specific Examples of Influence:

    Campaign Strategy: Pete’s 2020 presidential campaign showed a sophisticated understanding of how to build a broad coalition, appealing to both progressive and moderate voters. This strategy mirrors Gramscian tactics of building alliances across different societal groups to achieve political objectives.

    Policy Initiatives: As Secretary of Transportation, Pete Buttigieg has prioritized infrastructure projects that aim to bridge socio-economic divides, such as improving public transit in underserved communities. This focus on addressing structural inequalities reflects a Gramscian approach to improving society by addressing foundational issues.

    Public Engagement: Pete’s emphasis on engaging with diverse communities and listening to their concerns shows an understanding of the importance of cultural and social engagement in governance. By valuing and incorporating diverse perspectives, he builds the cultural hegemony needed to sustain his policy initiatives.

In summary, while Pete Buttigieg's politics are distinct from his father’s Marxist scholarship, the intellectual environment he was raised in likely provided him with valuable tools and perspectives. These include critical thinking, an understanding of power dynamics, historical awareness, persuasive communication, a respect for education and expertise, a commitment to social justice, and resilience—each of which has contributed to his effectiveness as a politician and cabinet secretary.

ChatGPT link: Influence of Marxism on Politics



Media darling Pete Buttigieg was in unit that worked with CIA in Afghanistan

Weakness is our diversity?

Quote:Armoured vehicles, night vision binoculars: Qatar lends equipment to French police for Olympics

France having deployed much of its tactical equipment in New Caledonia, it has asked Doha for
help in securing the Games, Le Monde has learned.


What they want you to think...


...What is.

'Qatari armored vehicles, some in urban camouflage livery, made their way through the streets of Paris,
passing by the Arc de Triomphe, the Pont de l'Alma and the Eiffel Tower with a French police escort.
On Friday, July 12, the security partnership between France and Qatar for the Olympic Games did not
go unnoticed. Qatar was pleased with the public relations operation, sharing it on social media.

Also filmed and photographed by dozens of passers-by, the procession prompted hundreds of
publications and comments – often indignant – online. "Despite its proximity to the Muslim
Brotherhood and #Hamas, Qatar, marching through Paris, is supporting our law enforcement
for the #JO [Olympics]. Soon China or even Russia?" asked Senator Valérie Boyer
(Les Républicains, right-wing), on X.

The photo, and others like it, have raised a few eyebrows among law enforcement officers.
"They turn up with 4x4s in urban guerrilla mode when they're supposed to be doing foot patrols
and wandering police dogs around Roissy – it doesn't make any sense," said an Interior Ministry
source on Friday, recalling that, on paper, the agreement signed on February 28 between France
and Qatar on security cooperation for the Olympics covered foot patrols by Qatari police officers
and explosives detection missions. "So what's the point of parading around in war vehicles?"
he asked.

Long-standing cooperation
The tour of Paris with sirens wailing was all the more irritating for the public authorities as they
have been far less forthcoming about another agreement made discreetly between the emirate's
authorities and the national gendarmerie.

Le Monde has learned that the French Gendarmerie's GIGN elite tactical unit has made an unusual
request to Qatar: to obtain the loan of half a dozen armored vehicles to enable it to carry out its
security missions during the Olympic Games.

The Gendarmerie is not commenting officially but several sources within the institution point to a
necessity due to the allocation of manpower and equipment to the situation in New Caledonia
where tension was rekindled after the death of a 38-year-old man, Rock Victorin Wamytan, during
an intervention by the GIGN on Wednesday, July 10, in a local context that is still extremely tense.

In June, the Qatari government announced its agreement to provide the elite Gendarmerie unit with
five to six unmarked and armored 4x4s, as well as an armored vehicle of the small protected vehicle
type, "by virtue of the ties that unite the Lekhwiya [Qatar's internal security force] and the Gendarmerie."

I saw this several years ago and consider it worth a watch

It was interesting to me and well done.. A supposedly bad cop undercover and a supposedly good cop feeding info to the bad guys.. What could go wrong ?

Sung By Kermit the Frog. 

Two places you might see a bird blowing on at hot worm before eating !!

Quote:I am left now with only Frederick the racoon at the window. He has stopped scratching at the handle for my attention and instead is catching little white moths with his agile little fingers. Once he has caught them all, he settles down there, his plump bum pressed up against the glass.

He will not go away entirely. He is where he wants to be. I accept his presence and work hard not to feed him.

Do not feed him. Do not feed him.

Feeding one led to feeding 24 and absolute chaos. Because of one raccoon. Do not feed him. My heart does not agree. So many times in life our heart does not agree with our head.

When the sun rises over the river I can see him silhouetted there. My gaze follows the frieze of trees down to the edge of the property where fog disperses above the pond below. I wonder if there are enough frogs there to help feed the children of the night I have loved all this time. I don’t know. Today there is a sunrise but it is blinded by the dark rain. The hard rain that falls. The hard times that come. For the children of daylight.

They are still sleeping at dawn, lost in dreams, waiting for the alarm that jolts them into their life for the day. They who have neither time for heart nor head but only for the herd. Herd into buses, into offices, into the machine. Herd together or at least pretend. Herd into the lineups. Do as others do. Say as they say. Believe as they believe. Go where they go. There is safety in numbers. Follow the herd. It is that time. Now. Is it?

Even with this rain I can hear the husky buzzing of motorcycles on the highway going too fast. Too fast. And why? Because some days nothing matters. Nothing at all. And we see that more and more. Nothing and nobody matters. The social niceties tattered by trauma now gone. Just fight the way through the day. Find the money to pay the bills. Find a place to stop worrying if only for a few moments. Don’t pay any attention to the people around you. They don’t matter. Now. Ride in the rain as fast as you can.

There are still some who believe in kindness. They are overwhelmed with others’ needs. They are drooping in the rain now like the maple leaves against a grey sky. They are tired. They keep on going until they don’t. How much heart is enough? Where is the end to this time? This pressing want and anxiety?

The hard rains that are coming will sting bitterly. It is said this will be worse than the Great Depression by those who study such things. But we don’t believe that. We can’t. How can we? A human cannot live without hope and that sounds about as hopeless as can be.

We aren’t prepared for much of all this. Perhaps however, it will be easier on the “colonialized” countries of the west because we are closer to the time when pioneers did everything from scratch, living without the luxuries, having to build everything they needed, building up countries that ironically are now being dismantled as if all that toil and dreaming of better lives meant nothing.

There are still some who remember people who lived the early days. Many of them now have cottages far from the city without electricity and conveniences so they can live the pioneer life. Aside perhaps from fond memories of times past, such endeavours make me wonder why now. Perhaps it was a better life. There is the hope. It might just be a better life all round if we can get there from here and leave the madness that we’ve seemingly created behind.

And this would be fine. If there weren’t those who will not allow such things now in charge.

We are to be put into boxes in the cities where we will be provided everything we need. The chickens and the cows and the wood stoves gone. A button on a wall. A machine making meat. AI as our friend and neighbour and the dark framed glass buildings our new history.

But no one is in awe of a box of glass. It is not a cathedral. It is not soul searing catch at the heart. It is pragmatically utilitarian. Perhaps that is what we are to marvel at? How cost effective. How efficient. No. We do not. We will not. It is head not heart.

No tourist of the future will come to marvel at the architecture. Did they who build such ugly things think they would? They who are in charge do not understand that in the windows of the glass boxes there will be no raccoon catching moths in the rain.

And that matters.

I've had this theory for a very long time now. This probably started around 1995 or so for me. This was around the same time we were learning about MKULTRA, as the files had been recently declassified back then.

My theory is this, and this is all for entertainment purposes. We haven't discussed a good conspiracy in a while, and having been surfing around these sites a while now I haven't seen any posts on this.

The theory is this:

"Woodstock" (the original)

I have watched the documentary film on Woodstock several times throughout my life. Something always stands out to me. 

Everyone, as they are arriving, all have the same type of vibe going, and all saying the same thing. All with the same look on their faces. Almost as if they are all hypnotized. I've studied hypnotism, and yeah, that sleep eye look. Totally calm. Thousands and thousands of people and they are all calm. Almost as if they were told to "be calm" in the hypnotism. And all "drawn there," as they all keep saying throughout the documentary. 

There is much more to it, but I would have to break down that entire video to fully explain what it is im seeing.

I had always wondered if that was actually an experiment on mass hypnotism, and Woodstock proved the power it could have over a mass of people stretching across an entire continent. 

I have had a ton of old hippy friends. They always had the best weed back in the day. I've listened to a lot of their stories. I've met a few that were there. And they all say the same thing.

"If you can remember Woodstock you weren't at Woodstock."

The people I've met who were there, none of them remember being there.

We don't remember things we've done while hypnotized. 

This with a lot of what the dudes who actually put on the show kept saying tripping out about throughoutthe film.

"It worked. I can't believe it worked."

I had always wondered if "it worked" meant they had some knowledge of it being an experiment on mind control.

What say you, RN? Could Woodstock in the 60's have been a successful experiment using mind control techniques?


Just for fun. Something to discuss. I'm sick of the politics.

Think this is all A.I. created ??