That is freedom of speech.




UK Treasure trove of LLM (Large Language Model) training data.


The UK Government has just taken a significant lead in the competition for the creation of substantial and meaningful (to them) AI data sets.


If you comment about her hair, you'll go straight to jail. At the very least you get your name added to a special "list."








3 years for a meme Vs. 6 months for murder:




Wild, crazy times!


UK Rendition Ops Coming for Americans

I'm just going to dive right in.

People who think they're smart because they know how to use Google, are the biggest pains in the ass.

I've got 15 years electrical experience, and I was sharing a story that had a little knowledge in there, and as always there is some "Google smart" dumbass who chimes in with something they read on Google.

No matter what you say these people always know more because they "googled it."

To even tell these people that Google is highly biased and controlled information, and even often times false is a waste of time.

People can't even be taught anymore. Everyone already knows everything. 

And yet, I'm surrounded by freakin' morons who don't know they're left hand from their right, unless they Google'd it.

The world is getting dumber and dumber.....all thanks to Google. 

I know you all know these people. Smh

They need to shut the **** up. Because they don't know diddly squat.

That is all.

Preplanning already. I remember every election (before the last one) where the results were known the same night, even way back when we "Only" had paper ballots. Does anyone buy that they can't "count" ballots any longer? If so, what is the use of electronic machines other than the obvious?

One of the best comments on the thread:

Quote:They can't tell you the results on Election Night.


But they can tell you today that it will be Kamala.

LOL

Quote:The Pennsylvania Department of State has announced that the results of the state's upcoming election will not be known on election night.


In a social media post, the department ,“Pennsylvanians won’t always know the final results of all races on election night. Any changes in results that occur as countries continue to count ballots are not evidence that an election is ‘rigged.’” The post also included a link to a website dedicated to fact-checking claims about Pennsylvania's election process.

The announcement echoes the situation from the 2020 election when initial results appeared to favor President Donald Trump as polls closed. However, as mail-in ballots were counted in the following days, Joe Biden was declared the winner in Pennsylvania. The prolonged counting process has frustrated some critics who argue that state election results should be finalized and made public on or immediately following November 5.


Despite calls for reform, Pennsylvania lawmakers did not pass legislation that would allow pre-canvassing of ballots, which could speed up the counting process. The legislative session ended without any changes to the law despite the Pennsylvania House of Representatives passing an initiative in May, according to The Washington Post.

As one of the key battleground states in the upcoming election, Pennsylvania's 19 electoral votes could be crucial in determining the next president. If the race comes down to Pennsylvania, it may take several days before the American public knows the final outcome of the election.

“If the electoral college comes down to Pennsylvania or Wisconsin, we might still face a long period where we don’t know the winner,” explained Rachel Orey, an elections expert with the Bipartisan Policy Center.

If you are still working this may shed some light on how much more you are going to "not have" shortly.


https://www.kamalataxcalculator.com/

I do hope someone someday gets into government that will decapitate the sickos who reside and work in Washington for our government..

Not much of a surprise IMO
https://lists.theepochtimes.com/links/fu...CQlQHbzfHt

Quote:Disposable face masks, such as those health officials encouraged (or in some cases, mandated) the public to wear during the COVID-19 pandemic, are made of synthetic fibers and may contain chemical compounds. Many people have questioned the wisdom of wearing masks made of synthetic fibers for long periods, asking whether inhaling the chemical compounds masks release could lead to health problems.
Face masks may release up to 5,390 microplastic particles in a 24-hour period and surgical masks in particular may release approximately 3,152 microfibers in less than one hour, according to a review in the journal Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety in April 2024.
To perform this review, German and Swiss researchers examined 24 studies evaluating 631 surgical, cloth, and N95 masks to determine their composition and the compounds they released. Sixty-three percent of the masks showed “alarming results,” the researchers wrote, releasing high amounts of micro- and nanoplastics.

The researchers found that many substances in the masks—among them volatile organic compounds (VOCs), xylene, acrolein, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), phthalates, lead, cadmium, copper, and titanium dioxide (TiO2)—exceeded the established safety limits for humans.
In a 2022 article published in the journal Nature, a group of researchers determined that 12 types of face masks all “exceeded the acceptable exposure level to TiO2 by inhalation,” and called for regulatory standards for the use of TiO2, a potential human carcinogen.
The Latest Research
The latest study of this type, “Comprehensive Risk Assessment of the Inhalation of Plasticizers From the Use of Face Masks,” which recently appeared in the journal Environment International, tested four types of face masks for the presence of 31 types of plasticizers. It also investigated to what extent these compounds and others were released (and thus inhaled) during simulated mask use.
While “overall plasticizer concentration was similar in all four face mask types,” the researchers report, they found surgical masks and FFP2s (widely used in Europe) had high plasticizer release rates of around 4 percent (3.9 percent and 4.8 percent, respectively).
Related Stories
[/url]COVID Mask Wearers Could Be Exposed to Toxic Chemicals: Study

8/29/2023


Bad News for Mask-Wearers: Study Shows Link to More COVID Infections | Facts Matter
[url=https://www.theepochtimes.com/epochtv/bad-news-for-mask-wearers-study-shows-link-to-more-covid-infections-facts-matter-5542933?ea_src=author_manual&ea_med=related_stories]
12/7/2023
“Face masks are predominantly composed of synthetic materials,” most commonly polypropylene, polystyrene, polyethylene terephthalate, and polyester, wrote the researchers, of the group Environmental and Water Chemistry for Human Health (ONHEALTH), part of the Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research in Barcelona, Spain.
Manufacturers also incorporate additives such as phthalates and organophosphate esters (OPEs) into face masks as plasticizers “to increase softness and flexibility, or as a flame retardant,” the researchers explain. These are not the only chemical compounds found in face masks. Others include heavy metals, PFAS, and VOCs.
In the ONHEALTH study, the average plasticizer concentrations found in different mask types were:
7.27 µg (micrograms)—surgical masks
8.61 µg—reusable masks
11.0 µg—KN-95 masks
13.9 µg—FFP2 masks
Inhalation Simulation Tests
To investigate the amounts of plasticizers the masks released, the researchers conducted inhalation experiments on paper-mâché dummy heads to replicate typical use in humans. The findings showed that higher temperatures mimicking human breathing caused higher release of plastic additives. “The high-temperature condition [in the experiment] presents the worst-case scenario for the release of plastic additives,” the researchers wrote.
The amounts of compounds the masks released varied widely, ranging from 0.1 percent to 95 percent depending on the specific compound and mask type. “Notably, OPEs exhibited a mean release percentage of 1.0%, similar to phthalates, which showed a 1.2% release,” the researchers wrote.
The mask types with the highest overall release rates were surgical masks and FFP2s (3.9 percent and 4.8 percent, respectively). The reusable masks showed the lowest release rate, averaging 0.6 percent. The release rate of KN-95s was 1.2 percent. One surgical mask showed a release rate of one compound, acetyl tributyl citrate, a potential endocrine disruptor, of 95 percent.
Masks ‘An Additional Exposure Pathway’
Importantly, the values for the specific compounds the study tested for “remained below the established threshold limits,” the researchers wrote. However, plasticizers are present in more than just face masks; they are commonly incorporated into toys, food packaging, clothing, cosmetics, cleaning products, and other items most people come into contact with daily.
Face masks “represent an additional exposure pathway that, when considered alongside other more predominant routes such as indoor/outdoor inhalation, dermal absorption, and dietary intake, makes the total exposure worthy of consideration,” the researchers wrote.
“Due to the proven exposure to plasticizers, the genotoxic, immunotoxic, and teratogenic [birth defect] risk remains regardless of the calculated values, particularly for children, pregnant women, and other risk groups.”
Plasticizers have been found in pregnant women’s blood and have been implicated in the dramatic drop in global sperm counts over the past 50 years, raising concern that these chemicals damage fertility and the health of future generations.

Attached Files

Thumbnail(s)
   

A short video of the original Rednecks https://www.youtube.com/shorts/440jBM8Bi...ture=share

I do not own nor will I voluntarily ever buy an Electric vehicle.

Quote:A terrifying incident occurred in Korea on August 1, 2024, as an electric vehicle exploded in an underground parking garage, injuring multiple people and damaging over 140 cars. Watch the security footage revealing how quickly the fire spread and learn about the critical safety measures that failed. Discover the truth about lithium-ion battery hazards and what can be done to prevent future tragedies.

Quote:August 5, 2024 / Joseph P. Farrell

When I read the following article shared with us by T.M. (with our gratitude), my first initial thought was that I was having yet another episode of deja poo. If you don't know what deja poo is, it's that sense that you've heard all of this crap before. In recent years I've blogged about story after story of countries trying to repatriate their gold from big western central banks, like the Bank of England or the New York Fed, only to be told they can't have it because "we don't like you," (England to Venezuela), or that "you can't have all of it right now" (the USA to Germany), or the nation finds out that maybe all the gold isn't of assay and reserve quality after they do get their gold back (Germany), or that, "hey, gosh, shucks, seems we misplaced all your gold... sorry about that!" (US New York Fed governor Strong to Reichsbank President Hjalmar Schlacht, 1928). We've also blogged about the Canadian mint finding gold clad tungsten bars, Chinese loans worth billions of dollars collateralized with more gold-clad tungsten bars, and gobs of missing World War Two Operation Golden Lily Japanese gold. But hey, I'm so glad there are still people that want the gold standard back, because it's the only sure guarantee of a stable international monetary system, because, you know, gold is real money, those big international and central banksters are the most trustworthy people in the world, and because, well, hey, "too big to fail" and "too big to jail," or something like that.

So now the latest disappearing gold act seems to have occurred in - big surprise here - Argentina. Get out your favorite Juan Peron beer mug, pour a nice cold cerveza and enjoy this one:

The mystery of Argentina’s gold: Milei admits that it was transferred abroad, without specifying the quantities or destination

According to the article, it would seem that either the government of Argentina, or its central bank, or perhaps both, were behind a covert very quiet smuggling transfer of Argentina's gold to hidden unknown places and persons abroad: From the first three paragraphs:

Quote:Argentina’s reserves, held by its Central Bank, include almost two million troy ounces of gold, valued at about $4.5 billion. But lately, there’s a question that’s on everybody’s lips: where is it? Was it taken out of the country? Did some of it remain within Argentina, while the rest was transferred abroad? Well, the official information only offers partial answers.

The administration of far-right President Javier Milei admitted to the recent transfer of gold abroad, but didn’t specify quantities, the destination, or the purpose for this measure. Nor did the Central Bank provide any details. In a scenario of financial instability — and with the government facing the need to accumulate reserves — the decision generated suspicions and speculation. There are also fears that the gold could possibly be seized, due to long-standing legal cases that have been filed against Argentina by foreign creditors.

The news about the transfer of the gold was not officially announced by the government or the Central Bank. Rather, the information came from the bank workers’ union, known as La Bancaria. (emphasis added)

The emphasized portion of the previous quotation indicates the nature of the interpretive problem: is the Argentine government paying off creditors with its gold? - recall only the confrontations between that country's government and its President Kircher a few years ago - or is the country trying to safeguard its assets by hiding them and placing them beyond the legal reach of creditors?  There is, possibly, a clue just a little further on; continuing the citation from where we broke off:

Quote:Its leader — the left-wing legislator Sergio Palazzo — presented a request within the framework of the Law of Access to Public Information for the Central Bank of the Argentine Republic (BCRA), asking “if there [were any] operations to send gold bars abroad during the month of June.” Specifically, he demanded to know if transfers of gold took place on June 7 and June 28 through Lumil — a private security firm that transports valuables — and British Airways. He also wanted to know the specific amounts, their destination, the administrative procedures taken, as well as the names of the officials involved.

The BCRA has 30 days to respond to the legislator and has not yet done so. But last Friday, Minister of Economy Luis Caputo acknowledged that the operation was indeed carried out. “It’s a very positive move… if you have gold in the BCRA, it’s as if you have [assets] inside that cannot be used for anything. If you have it outside the country, you can get returns,” he argued, in an interview with La Nación+, an Argentine TV channel. “It’s much better to have it guarded outside, where they pay you something,” he added.

His words suggest that the purpose of the shipment — possibly to London or Basel, according to speculation — was to deposit the gold and earn interest. However, if that’s indeed the case, numerous economists have warned that the logic of the transfer — with the cost of the required insurance — didn’t justify the operation, given that the returns are very low.  (Emphasis added)

In other words, it appears that Senor Milei's administration has decided to use Argentina's gold reserves as a means of earning "interest", and that means that the gold reserves have been hypothecated as a part of investments or collateral for a loan, as the article suggests:

Quote:Also without giving details, President Milei later hinted that the transfer of the gold is related to the possibility of using it as collateral to take out a bridge loan. The president said that Argentina already has sufficient U.S. dollars available to pay the maturity of interest on foreign debt — a payment of about $1.6 billion — which is due in January 2025. He claims that the bridge loan would be to pay an additional sum of $3 billion to foreign creditors.

If this is the purpose of transferring the gold abroad, the government’s bet would consist of attempting to convey tranquility to the financial markets. This would, in theory, reduce the country’s risk level, which prevents it from taking out new lines of credit. On the other hand, by turning to gold, it suggests that Argentina doesn’t have sufficient liquid assets and is now forced to resort to its most precious treasure.

So what's going on?

At the beginning of this blog I briefly reviewed all those blogs I've written on this site over the years about gold and the attempts of various countries to repatriate their reserves from western vaults in Paris, London, and New York.  The countries attempting to do this were Germany, the Netherlands, Austria, and Venezuela, with Germany sparking the round of repatriation, while other stories involving gold-clad tungsten bars popped up in China and Canada, where such bars were used to acquire liquid capital. In the case of the German repatriation, the amount sought, and the amount delivered and repatriated, were two different things, and to add insult to injury, there were questions about the assay purity of the bars that were repatriated among many circles in Germany that had been following the story and raising inconvenient questions that the Bundesbank was in no hurry to answer.

In this case, the article has outlined the conventional interpretive and speculative possibilities adequately. But there are some high octane speculative possibilities that invite us to take the plunge off the end of the speculation twig and into the deep canyon below. Argenina's gold was not repatriated, but depatriated. But in all other respects it resembles the repatriation stories by having something in common with them: for whatever reason, countries are trying to get their gold reserves out of the central banking system of "the west", i.e., the central banks of France, Great Britain, and above all, the USA. And that effort appears to have been to try and bring the precious yellow bars to the European continent itself.  If that's the case, then my guess would be that Argentina's gold is either in the vaults of the Tower of Basel (The Bank of International Swindles Settlements), or in the vaults of some large Swiss investment bank, such as Union Bank of Zurich or Credit Suisse.

As for Argentina's potential motives, the article has adequately outlined these as well, but perhaps there are others as well. With the growing Chinese influence in South America and with the Argentine government, perhaps a depatriation of Argentina's gold reserves to Europe was and is a way for that country to hedge its bets, placing its gold where it will be outside the reach of China, but where it could conceivably be hypothecated in loans and investments designed to secure Argentina a place at the BRICS table. Time will tell.

Quote:The U.K. government says that it has arrested the first person for ""using threatening words"" in relation to the ""violent public disorder across the UK."" Words and thought are now crime in dystopic Britain. Academic Researcher Ralph Schoellhammer joins us to discuss.