I had not seen this presentation only heard about it a few years ago. I just started watching.

I guess more UFO threats & wars are in store to make up the loss. Deep state business as usual. Nobody in the US military industrial complex of echelons goes to jail anymore.

Quote:RTX will pay almost $1B for defrauding DOD, allegedly bribing Qatari official

That’s on top of the $200 million levied in August for illegal exports to China and elsewhere.

Defense giant Raytheon will pay the U.S government more than $950 million for defrauding the Pentagon and allegedly bribing a Qatari official, the Justice Department announced today.

RTX admitted to “two separate schemes” to defraud the Defense Department in connection with the Patriot missile systems and a radar system, and other defense services, according to a DOJ release.

“These schemes to defraud caused the DOD to pay Raytheon over $111 million more than Raytheon should have been paid on the contracts,” the release said.

RTX will pay the government more than $124 million for bribing a high-level Qatari military official to win defense contracts, and then concealed those payments by falsifying documents, according to an SEC filing.

“Raytheon engaged in criminal schemes to defraud the U.S. government in connection with contracts for critical military systems and to win business through bribery in Qatar,” said Deputy Assistant Attorney General Kevin Driscoll of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division. “Such corrupt and fraudulent conduct, especially by a publicly traded U.S. defense contractor, erodes public trust and harms the DOD, businesses that play by the rules, and American taxpayers. Today’s resolutions, with criminal and civil recoveries totaling nearly $1 billion, reflect the Criminal Division’s ability to tackle the most significant and complex white-collar cases across multiple subject matters.”

In a statement, RTX said the misconduct occurred “largely prior to 2020” and the financial impact of these matters is consistent with the reserve announced in the company’s July 2024 quarterly earnings report.

“RTX is taking responsibility for the misconduct that occurred. We have worked diligently during the investigations to remediate that misconduct and continue to do so. We are committed to working closely with the incoming independent monitor to improve and further enhance our ethics and compliance program,” the company said.  

The defense contractor also recently was fined $200 million for the unauthorized export of defense technology to China, Russia, Iran, and elsewhere. In July, the company told investors during an earnings call that it set aside more than $1 billion to settle a number of government investigations.

"While this is one of the biggest penalties in recent memory, it is not an isolated incident with defense contractors. For example, earlier this year Lockheed settled a suit for $70 million to resolve overcharging the Navy for parts. Meanwhile, Boeing on the commercial aerospace end of the spectrum paid some $487 million related to 737 MAX certification," said Rich Pettibone of Forecast International, a sister brand of Defense One. “With RTX taking responsibility for the misconduct and paying the penalty, I don't anticipate any curtailment of their work with the Pentagon.”

https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/...65396.html

Quote:Stealth Edit: FBI Quietly Revises Violent Crime Stats

When the FBI originally released the “final” crime data for 2022 in September 2023, it reported that the nation’s violent crime rate fell by 2.1%. This quickly became, and remains, a Democratic Party talking point to counter Donald Trump’s claims of soaring crime.
But the FBI has quietly revised those numbers, releasing new data that shows violent crime increased in 2022 by 4.5%. The new data includes thousands more murders, rapes, robberies, and aggravated assaults.
The Bureau – which has been at the center of partisan storms – made no mention of these revisions in its September 2024 press release. 
RCI discovered the change through a cryptic reference on the FBI website that states: “The 2022 violent crime rate has been updated for inclusion in CIUS, 2023.” But there is no mention that the numbers increased. One only sees the change by downloading the FBI’s new crime data and comparing it to the file released last year.
After the FBI released its new crime data in September, a USA Today headline read: “Violent crime dropped for third straight year in 2023, including murder and rape.” 
It’s been over three weeks since the FBI released the revised data. The Bureau’s lack of acknowledgment or explanation about the significant change concerns researchers.
“I have checked the data on total violent crime from 2004 to 2022,” Carl Moody, a professor at the College of William & Mary who specializes in studying crime, told RealClearInvestigations. “There were no revisions from 2004 to 2015, and from 2016 to 2020, there were small changes of less than one percentage point. The huge changes in 2021 and 2022, especially without an explanation, make it difficult to trust the FBI data.”
“It is up to the FBI to explain what they have done, and they haven’t explained these large changes,” Dr. Thomas Marvell, the president of Justec Research, a criminal justice statistical research organization, told RCI.
The FBI did not respond to RCI’s repeated requests for comment.

Extensive Revisions in Violent Crime Stats

The actual changes in crimes are extensive. The updated data for 2022 report that there were 80,029 more violent crimes than in 2021. There were an additional 1,699 murders, 7,780 rapes, 33,459 robberies, and 37,091 aggravated assaults. The question naturally arises: should the FBI’s 2023 numbers be believed?

Revised FBI Data Showing Crime Rate Increase
RCI
Without the increase, the drop in violent crime in 2023 would have been less than half as large – only 1.6% instead of the reported drop of 3.5%.
The FBI isn’t the only government agency that has been revising its data. The Bureau of Labor Statistics massively overestimated the number of jobs created during the year that ended in March by 818,000 people.
The FBI’s crime stats revisions reveal how much guesswork is involved in even the “final” numbers often seized on by politicians. The FBI doesn’t simply count reported crimes. Instead, it offers estimates by extrapolating data from police departments that report only partial-year data. The Bureau also makes estimates for cities that report no data. The FBI’s method of generating these estimates changes over time, and it affects the figures they report.
“The [FBI’s] processes, such as how it tries to ‘estimate’ unreported figures, has long been a black box, even to the Bureau of Justice Statistics – the Department of Justice’s actual statistical agency,” says Jeffrey Anderson, who headed the DOJ’s Bureau of Justice Statistics from 2017 to 2021. 
Anderson said when he headed the Bureau of Justice Statistics, “We definitely would have highlighted in a press release or a report the 6.6% change recorded for 2022, which moved the numbers from a drop to a rise in violent crime.”

Many Crimes Are Unreported

Another problem with FBI crime data is its reliance on reported crimes. Most crimes go unreported, with only about 45% of violent crimes and 30% of property crimes brought to the police’s attention, according to the National Crime Victimization Survey. Since the FBI only tracks reported incidents and this gap is so large, researchers argue that when the media discusses crime rates based on FBI data, they should clarify that it reflects “reported” crime, not give the impression that total crime is changing.
Nonreporting of crime doesn’t affect all crimes equally. Nonreporting of murder and motor vehicle theft is relatively rare. In murder cases, victims can’t be overlooked, and for auto theft, insurance claims require police reports. However, it’s difficult to fully trust even these numbers because the FBI underreported 1,699 murders and 54,216 motor vehicle thefts in 2022, casting doubt on the reliability of the data.
Although recent attention has focused on the decline in murder rates, even with the revised numbers, the 16.2% drop from 2020 to 2023 still leaves murder rates 9.6% higher than pre-COVID levels. 
A half-century ago, the DOJ provided a total crime measure, including both reported and unreported crime. The results of the department’s Bureau of Justice Statistics 2023 National Crime Victimization Survey, released in mid-September, tell a very different story from the FBI data. 
The NCVS interviews 240,000 people each year about their personal experiences.
Instead of the FBI’s 3.5% drop in the reported violent crime rate in 2023, the NCVS found a 4.1% increase in the reported violent crime rate. Even with the revised FBI numbers, in 2022, the FBI’s 4.5% increase pales in comparison to the NCVS’s 29.1% increase.

FBI - Change in Reported Crime Rates
RCI
Over the past few years, the number of police officers has declined because of cuts in budgets and many retirements. One result is that police departments nationwide – from  Charlottesville and Henrico County, Va., to Chicago, Ill. and Olympia, Wash. – are no longer responding to calls unless the perpetrator is still there actively committing the crime. Instead of police coming out to investigate and take a report, residents in those jurisdictions can still go to the police station and wait in line to get a police report filled out. In addition, despite the widespread belief that calling 911 is enough to report a crime, the FBI officially doesn’t tally 911 calls. It only counts crimes when police make out an official report.

Other Data Show Sharper Rises in Crime

While the FBI claims that serious violent crime has fallen by 5.8% since Biden took office, the NCVS numbers show that total violent crime has risen by 55.4%. Rapes are up by 42%, robbery by 63%, and aggravated assault by 55% during Biden’s term. Since the NCVS started, the largest previous increase over three years was 27% in 2006, so the increase under Biden was slightly more than twice as large.
The increases shown by the NCVS during the Biden-Harris administration are by far the largest percentage increases over any three years, slightly more than doubling the previous record.
Comparing 2023 rates with 2019 pre-COVID violent crime rates, the FBI’s new 2023 data show virtually no improvement – just a 0.2% drop – while the NCVS shows a 19% increase over that period. But the news media didn’t cover the crime survey when it was released last month.
“With the media using the 2022 FBI data to tell us for a year that crime was falling, it is disappointing that there are no news articles correcting that misimpression,” Moody told RCI. “We will have to see whether the FBI later also revises the 2023 numbers.”
At the beginning of this year, the media was running headlines like National Public Radio’s: “Violent crime is dropping fast in the U.S. – even if Americans don’t believe it.” “At some point in 2022 … there was just a tipping point where violence started to fall and it just continued to fall,” NPR claimed. But now the FBI has itself admitted its violent crime numbers were way off.
Even as polls show that Americans are concerned about crime, the FBI and the media are making it difficult to see how crime rates have changed over the last few years. A Gallup survey late last year found that 92% of Republicans and 58% of Democrats thought crime was increasing. A February Rasmussen Reports survey found that, by a 4.7-to-1 margin, likely voters say violent crime in the U.S. is getting worse (61%), not better (13%). A Gallup poll found in March that “crime and violence” was Americans’ second biggest concern, after inflation. But the media and politicians used the inaccurate FBI data to try to convince people that they were wrong.
“This FBI report is stunning because it now doesn’t state that violent crime in 2022 was much higher than it had previously reported, nor does it explain why the new rate is so much higher, and it issued no press release about this large revision,” said David Mustard, the Josiah Meigs Distinguished Professor at the University of Georgia who researches extensively on crime. “This lack of transparency harms the FBI’s credibility.”

Quote:October 16, 2024 / Joseph P. Farrell

When I opened my email a few days ago and saw this story that had been shared by G.A.C.(with our thanks!) I immediately filed it in my "finals" folder, because it's one of those stories that might be just a "minor" blip on the radar, or it might be one of those stories signaling something much larger may be going on. Indeed, that "something much larger" is the subject of today's high octane speculation.

The story, as the headline notes, is that Germany's elite GSG-9 unit has been deployed to the Baltic seaport of Neustedt in the German state of Schleswig-Holstein (which is the German state immediately south of, and sharing a border with, Denmark):

Germany moves to prevent another Nord Stream-style attack – media

Now, there may be some readers here who are unfamiliar with that elite unit of the German police, and unfamiliar with what its history has been. I covered some of this in my book The Nazi international, so I'll review it here:  "GSG" stands for Grenzschutzgruppe, or basically, "border protection group," and as such is in that "fuzzy" area of German police and military units that inhabit both the world of police or law enforcement, and military.  It's Germany's version of Delta force, the Navy seals, and Border police all rolled into one very nasty elite unit, with a wide mission brief depending on tactical circumstances.  As I pointed out in that book, the GSG-9 was deployed decades ago by Chancellor Helmut Schmidt along with British SAS commando units to recapture a Lufthansa airlines flight that had been hijacked and flown to Uganda. The hijackers murdered the pilot and held the passengers hostage. Enter the GSG-9: hostages freed, hijackers shot and killed. End of hijacking. (And you'll note, not a single Lufthansa hijacking from then until now).  It was the first significant deployment of a Germany "military" unit outside its borders since the Second World War.

But not the last. The next time we hear of significant GSG-9 involvement beyond the borders of Germany was, believe it or not, during the Oklahoma City bombing aftermath, when the GSG-9 was allegedly deployed by Chancellor Kohl to the United States where it was used to help smuggle the German national Andreas Strassmeir, a former German army captain, a graduate from its war academy, and son of German federal cabinet member Gunther Strassmeir, a minister without portfolio in Kohl's cabinet and, as it turned out, the man who was in charge of the plan for German reunification. Andreas had become a person of interest to the FBI in connection to the Oklahoma City bombing as he had often been seen in Tulsa, Oklahoma, in the company of Timothy McVeigh at a local strip bar. A nationwide manhunt was launched for Strassmeir, until he turned up in Berlin and gave a press conference. The GSG-9, it is alleged, had smuggled him out of the USA through the FBI dragnet. If the allegation is true (and I believe it to be so), then this means the GSG-9 is also trained to conduct covert operations of a type more traditionally associated with espionage and intelligence than with para-military or law enforcement, operations requiring false identities and "legends" able to penetrate and exit a foreign country smoothly.

My point in rehearsing all this history is simply that this is a group of people that one does not want to "just casually encounter", nor is it a group that one just casually deploys. Indeed, as the above two examples suggest, their deployment in certain special situations would seem to require direct involvement or authorization of the German federal Chancellor himself.

So now we come to the article, and to the purported reasons for the deployment of its naval-diving specialists to Neustedt; the reasons, as RT is surmising, are revealed by the headline of the article itself: "Germany moves to prevent another Nord Stream style attack":

Quote:Germany’s Interior Ministry will permanently station a police tactical unit at the Baltic Sea port of Neustadt to ensure a rapid response to any potential attacks on “critical infrastructure,” Der Spiegel weekly reported on Friday.

The move was reportedly prompted by the September 2022 Nord Stream pipeline blasts, which showed there was a “clear” danger of “acts of sabotage,” the media outlet said, citing security sources.

GSG 9, the counterterrorism division of Germany’s Federal Police, features a maritime deployment unit, GSG 9/2, which has specially trained divers within its ranks and is equipped with speedboats, Der Spiegel said. They can also operate from the country’s Federal Police vessels.

The article then provides some further grist for the high octane speculation mill:

Quote:The Nord Stream gas pipelines – the crucial energy infrastructure built to deliver Russian gas to Germany and the rest of Europe - were ruptured by underwater blasts in September 2022. Berlin launched a probe into the incident but has so far not made any results of the investigation public. Moscow has repeatedly stated that the German authorities have refused to share any information with Russia.

Western media outlets have repeatedly reported that a privately funded group of Ukrainian divers was supposedly behind the attack. Some reports also stated that the group allegedly acted on orders from General Valery Zaluzhny, who was later dismissed and became Kiev’s ambassador to the UK.

Russia has repeatedly stated that the US could have had a hand in the incident. In September, the Russian foreign intelligence, the SVR, claimed that Washington and London had masterminded the 2022 sabotage in an act of economic warfare against their EU allies and are now forcing Berlin to hide the truth.

These last three paragraphs are important, because it would seem that the German government is not telling anyone - not Russia, not the United Kingdom, not the United States, nor anyone else - whom its investigation fingered for ultimate responsibility for the bombing. One may safely eliminate two countries from the list of possible or probable guilty parties: Russia, and Germany themselves. Russia would hardly blow up its own pipeline as it constituted a major potential source of income - and hard currency - for Russia. The only circumstances that might have impelled Russia to do so would be to use it as a false flag to enhance its geopolitical goals, a usage of the event which we have not seen Russia undertaking to any great degree. Nor would Germany blow up a source of energy it needs (unless, of course, it was the deranged Mad Madam Merkel who seemed to view all German sources of energy, nuclear and otherwise, as something to be eliminated).

Indeed, the real culprits are strongly suggested by the Russians themselves, the UK and USA, perhaps acting with Ukrainian boots on the ground. I suspect the Russians are correct, and I suspect that Germany also has concluded the same thing. And that places the story about the GSG-9's deployment into a curious light. In the two famous examples of its deployment noted above, the world did not even know the GSG-9 had been deployed until after the operation was completed, and in the case of its rescue of Strassmeir, no official word has ever come from any organ of the German government. It remains a strongly-suspected rumor with only circumstantial evidence in support of it.

So when Germany announces the deployment of the unit via media "leaks and stories" - Der Spiegel  has long been suspected of playing the role of "government mouth piece" like the New York Times or Washington Post - the purpose is to serve notice to the real guilty parties that any further sabotage of German infrastructure will be first met with deadly force, and questions of the national identity and connections of the perpetrators of any such event will be asked post facto.


The bottom line? In my opinion, the cracks in NATO just grew a significantly larger, even though the story may seem "small"...

See you on the flip side...

Quote:For the past fifty years, the government has dramatically increased spending on education, healthcare, and welfare programs. But have these billions of dollars really made Americans smarter, healthier, and more prosperous? Joshua Rauh, professor of finance at Stanford and Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution, explains why big government leads to big problems.

I guess we should be glad the UK is disarmed and a peaceful country.... I really am glad I am old and do not have that much longer to watch the world turn into a secret police state where people are disappeared by their own government.

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2024/10...advocates/

Quote:UK Nanny State Law Would Force Pubs to Employ ‘Banter Police’, Warn Free Speech Advocates

Apparently not content with merely policing speech on the internet or on the streets, the leftist Labour Party government in Britain is reportedly looking to pass legislation which would crack down on supposedly offensive comments made in pubs.
The government of Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, in its impending Employment Rights Bill, would change equality laws in Britain to mean that employers would be held responsible for their employees being offended by “third parties” like their customers or the general public.
The law would require businesses and public institutions to take “all reasonable steps” to prevent harassment based on so-called “protected characteristics” from happening within their premises, The Telegraph reports.
Free speech advocates have argued that the law would force business owners, such as publicans, to employ Stasi-style speech police to comply with the government diktats.
General secretary of the Free Speech Union Toby Young warned: “Expect every pub in England and Wales to employ ‘banter cops’ who’ll be tasked with eavesdropping on customers’ conversations and barring anyone who tells an ‘inappropriate’ joke.”
Others warned that the law would have disastrous consequences for already struggling companies in Britain. Shadow Business Secretary, Conservative MP Kevin Hollinrake said that the “agenda is being driven by wokeness and the unions”.
“Ronald Reagan once said if fascism ever returns it will be in the name of liberalism. The people who are supposedly the greatest defenders of basic liberties and quite happy to jettison basic rights – be it over property, the rule of law and free speech – if it doesn’t accord with their own views.”

The potential introduction of speech police in pubs is just the latest attack on the industry by the leftist Labour government, which is pushing forward to ban smoking in outdoor areas such as in pub gardens. There have also reportedly been some within the government pushing for a new limit on pub hours to supposedly prevent alcohol-related illnesses.
Commenting on the attack on pubs, Reform UK MP Lee Anderson told The Express: “Once again this government are clamping down on free speech and hammering our publicans in the process.”
“With 50 pubs closing every month in the first half of this year, they need more support than ever not this nanny state nonsense.”
There have also been warnings that the proposed legislation would have a “chilling effect” on campuses as universities could potentially face lawsuits if students are offended by speakers who they disagree with. This comes after the Labour government already scrapped legislation specifically laying out protections for freedom of speech at universities.
Legal director at the law firm Doyle Clayton James Murray explained that the new law would likely mean controversial speakers would face even more difficulty speaking to students.
“If we think about a speaker that has been invited – say it’s a controversial gender critical speaker, like Julie Bindel or Kathleen Stock – someone might somewhat disingenuously say ‘I am an employee of this university and I find what she says deeply harassing’.
“The concern is that this will shift the balance away from free speech and universities will be more risk averse as they won’t want to be held liable for third-party harassment.”

Oh dear, it seems to be that those in the hallowed halls of Government who like to glean more expenses from
the public coffers and who enjoy a fine living arriving at conclusions that are palatable to those they allegedly
serve, have decided to begin a long-delayed inquiry into something that happened six years ago.

On the Rogue Nation archived website, we did a quite intensive probe ourselves into the semi-failed Novichok
poisoning of a former Russian double agent Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia, an investigation firmly set
alongside the news reports from the mainstream media.

Today in 2024, the focus seems to be on the only death in this incident, a Ms. Dawn Sturgess. The narrative
has changed from the factual to a-more emotive slant and I would suggest certain realities will be 'ironed-out'
to offer a different view of who the external casualties of this case were.
................................

The story goes that former-Colonel Sergei Skripal was living a low-key life in the English town of Salisbury in
2018 and staying off the radar after being convicted by Russian authorities in 2006 of spying for Britain.

When the US swapped him and three others for undisclosed reasons in 2010, Skripal was sentenced to
thirteen years imprisonment by the Moscow Regional Military Court, but pardoned in the same year by
Russian President Dmitry Medvedev.

With the UK's MI6's assistance, Sergei Skripal -now devoid of rank, and with his wife moved to Salisbury and
continued to provide information to the UK and other Western intelligence agencies for some time afterwards.
His wife -Lyudmila, passed away in 2012 due to cancer and Sergei lived alone in a house he'd purchased a
year earlier in Salisbury. She was buried near their son -Alexander, who died in St Petersburg 2017, but he
was somehow transferred to the UK six years after the Skripals had decided to live in Salisbury.


Salisbury.


   Yulia.                                                                                       Sergei.
Back to March of 2018 and his 33-year-old daughter -Yulia, decided to travel from Moscow and visit her sixty-six
year-old father at his modern Wiltshire home in a quiet cul-de-sac. During a walk around the shopping centre of
Salisbury, Sergei began to feel light-headed and Yulia took him to a park bench in a children's small play area
in order to rest and this is where the true story began.

Of course, the information provided below has vanished from the original BBC link offered in the archived RN site,
the security services of the UK and the state-funded news-outlet are paid by the same people!!
...........................

Originally posted on their site by the BBC 8th October 2018 and yet oddly found on the archived Rogue Nation
website 15th March 2018, 01:51pm. There's no 'update' comment from the BBC at the time of writing.
Source:

A BBC timeline:
*Yulia Skripal flew into London's Heathrow Airport on a flight from Russia at about 14:40 GMT on 3 March.
*On 4 March, at about 13:40 GMT, Mr Skripal and his daughter arrived at the Sainbury's upper level car park
in Salisbury city centre.
*Police said the pair went to the Bishop's Mill pub before going to Zizzi restaurant at 14:20 GMT, staying until
15:35 GMT.
*At 16:15 GMT emergency services received the first report of an incident.
*Police found the pair on a bench outside Zizzi restaurant in an "extremely serious condition".
*A police officer who fell ill after attending the incident - Det Sgt Nick Bailey - was also taken to hospital and
remains in a serious condition.

*Of the 38 [The BBC later updated this to 48] people who have been seen in hospital in relation to the incident,
34 have been discharged.
*Only Mr Skripal, his daughter Yulia and Det Sgt Bailey remain in hospital.
*One person is being monitored as an outpatient but is not showing any signs of exposure.
............................

To help, here's the 14th October 2024 from Wikpedia.

'On 4 March 2018, Skripal and his 33-year-old daughter Yulia, who was visiting from Moscow, were found
"slipping in and out of consciousness on a public bench" near a shopping centre in Salisbury by a doctor
and nurse who were passing by. While at Salisbury District Hospital, they were put into induced comas
to prevent organ damage.

Following the incident, health authorities checked 21 members of the emergency services and the public
for symptoms. Two police officers were treated for possible minor symptoms, said to be itchy eyes and
wheezing, while a third, Detective Sergeant Nick Bailey, who had been sent to Sergei Skripal's house,
was in a serious condition.

By 22 March 2018, Detective Sergeant Bailey had recovered enough to be discharged from the hospital,
and by 15 January 2019, he returned to active duty...'
............................

Basically, that was it for now. A pardoned ex-double agent had an attempt on his life by what was presumed
the Russian Government and his daughter was collateral damage. Those bad Ruskies had done it and after
some time, the pair recovered from something called 'Novichok'.

Where Sergei and Yulia went after this attempted poisoning, nobody knows and for a short time, the media
and ourselves resigned themselves on chewing with speculation. 'The poison was administered in the play-area
by someone passing the bench, the stuff was smeared on Sergei's front-door handle...' and on it went.
Yer' gotta keep those dwindling ratings going.

March marched on and it wouldn't be until late July of 2018, when two other characters stumbled onto this stage
of spy-craft intrigue, a brace of people not usually held in such regard by the BBC as appropriate players in their
usual  style of reporting.

(A running commentary of the current inquiry)

(To Be Continued)

Attached Files

Thumbnail(s)
       

Interesting video about Russia and a possible Civil War. With all the ethnic groups and diverse land areas I am surprised that with what remains of the great strong arm of the Soviet union it has kept the country together as well as it has.

Knowing I had all the ingredients available, I wanted to bake some bread from scratch today. My go-to cookbook is the old Better Homes and Gardens one. I couldn't find that cookbook so I thought I'd jog my memory and look up some basic bread recipes.

I looked at a half dozen recipes, averaged the measure of ingredients, and put together the various directions based on what I remembered from the BH&G Cookbook. The following recipe is what I came up with after baking two loaves just now.

Basic White Flour Bread Recipe


Cooking Implements:

2 bread pans
A large mixing bowl and mixing spoon
A measuring cup
A teaspoon and tablespoon
A rolling pin
A cooking thermometer
A clock, watch, or cooking timer.
A clean surface to work on
An oven large enough to bake two loaves of bread.


Ingredients:

5 cups all-purpose white flour
2 tablespoons active dry yeast
2 cups warm water not over 110°F
2 - 3 tablespoons extra virgin olive oil, vegetable oil or butter
1 tablespoon sugar
1 teaspoon salt


Directions:

Mix the yeast, sugar, and water in the mixing bowl and set aside for about 5 minutes.
After 5 minutes stir in 2 tablespoons oil, and one teaspoon salt. Now slowly add flour to the liquid and mix
thoroughly until the dough stiffens and pulls away from the bowl.
Turn the dough out onto a floured surface, flatten it into a circular shape with a rolling pin,
and knead for about 5 minutes.
Knead It by folding the far edge of the dough back over on itself
and pushing it down with the palms of your hands. Rotate and repeat.
Clean the mixing bowl and grease it with a few drops of oil or nonstick baking spray.
Knead the dough again for another few minutes, form it into a ball, then return it to the bowl,
making sure to grease the top of the dough ball.
Cover with a damp towel and keep warm until the dough doubles in size (about 1 hour in a room at 80F).
Punch down the dough with your fists and briefly knead out any air bubbles.
Cut the dough in half & shape it into two loaves (cylinder-shaped with ends pinched down).
Place the loaves in two greased bread pans, cover them with a damp towel,
and keep them in a warm place to rise. Once the dough rises just above the top of the pan (this may take 45 minutes at 80F room temperature), begin baking.
Bake at 400F for about 20 minutes until the loaves are golden brown and sounds hollow when tapped.
Allow bread to cool for at least 30 minutes before slicing.

Total time from start to finish: Around 3 hours.

Don't you just love Globalists? 

https://www.eagleobserver.com/news/2024/...t-with-no/

Quote:We have been expecting the United Nations to fully empower itself from an international cooperative body to an international governing body (world government) for some time. The globalists have dreamed of this, and constitutionalists have feared it for 80 years -- even before the nation rejected the League of Nations after World War I.



They have themselves ever pushed toward that end, making name changes over time that only partially revealed their intent: internationalists, world government, the establishment, New World Order, World Order, and now globalism -- even the Great Reset movement. This is nothing new. It was accomplished Sept. 22-23, 2024, with no Biden Administration, Democrat, RINO, or Deep State media pushback and no vote of the people. It's no longer coming. World Government is here.


It is also not new that the Biden Administration should advance the United Nations government over all nations, ending the sovereignty of nations, especially our own, as preserved in our constitution. Biden was always a prominent globalist, even publishing his loyalty to it in 1992 ("How I Learned to Love The New World Order," by Senator Joe Biden, June 16, 2021, LibertyUnderFire.org ). Today, virtually all globalists in America are Democrats or RINOS.


World globalists have always viewed a nation's sovereignty as their enemy and wanted the World Health Organization Treaty to give them power over nations, but it was defeated. The vehicle they use to destroy national sovereignty is the World Health Organization (WHO), and the issue used is fear of a pandemic. The word used is emergency. What can't be portrayed as an emergency? This time, they took their request for more power to the UN General Assembly on Sept. 22-23. The United Nations adopted a 66-page document called "The Pact for the Future." It was passed through a new procedure called the "Silence Procedure.''


This procedure made it a pact. If no one objected enough to argue against it, it was on the record as automatically adopted. Apparently, 193 countries, including the United States, expressed no objection. The problem is that without defining an emergency, the UN gets to decide what an emergency is, which gives it unlimited power. National sovereignty is destroyed. A world government, with the only limitations being those it imposes on itself, rules.


Congressional warning of the United Nations' intent to unilaterally end national sovereignty came only from Republicans. They gathered on the grounds of the Capitol, hoping the national media (mostly controlled by the Deep State) would cover them. Party leaders intentionally did so on September 17, Constitution Day, the anniversary of our signing of the U.S. Constitution in 1787, which brought freedom from excessive government to us and those nations modeling it. Our constitution governs this nation and is a gift from God that cannot be trumped by government. Unless resisted -- and Biden/Harris did not -- what happened at the UN is a fatal blow to freedom and our constitution.


Some remarks regarding this mostly secret UN empowerment follow: Congressman Bob Good of Virginia reminded those on the grounds of the Capitol that President Trump had pulled us out of the WHO because it was working for world government, which Joe Biden reinstated and today fully supports. Good quoted from a chapter in the 66-page document "Summit for the Future's" website "called 'On transforming global governance ascending beyond the powers being sought by a subordinate agency,' the WHO, the UN is seeking even broader and more powerful authority," adding "they seek to facilitate the evolution of the UN from an international cooperative body to an international governing body." He said, "The American people didn't vote for this, and they don't support this."


Congressman Ralph Norman, South Carolina, "called on Donald Trump to 'draw out' of Kamala Harris 'whether or not she supports world government, and if she doesn't, for her to disavow what the Biden administration is doing right now to try to bring it about.'"
An unnamed congressman said, "They want to cede our sovereignty over to the United Nations and, in particular, the World Health Organization." He spoke of our annual assessments of $850 million to the WHO "to become enslaved to them." We need out.

 Why? "Because the World Health Organization has become captured by 'our international adversary, China.'" And, "We can't give up any more of our sovereignty."


Congressman Ronnie Jackson voiced what everyone probably felt: "With regard to the United Nations, I said it before, and I'll say it again. I think the best thing we can do for the United Nations is to go to New York and push the entire thing off into the East River."


Yet another unnamed Congresswoman said, "They are going to approve a platform, an emergency platform that will operationalize automatically. What does it mean to operationalize automatically? It means that once they have passed it through the United Nations, they don't have to ask other countries to approve it. They will just go forward with their protocols."


Another unnamed congressman identified likely emergencies to follow: "Pandemics, high impact events involving a biological agent, disruptions to global flows of goods, people or finance, disruptive activity in cyberspace, or disruption to global digital connectivity, major events in outer space, or black swan events." This leads to their getting "involved pretty much whenever and wherever they want to" (House Republicans Rally Against --The UN & World Health Organization to protect American Sovereignty, live press conference on Capitol grounds, Sept. 17, 2024). Countries, as ruling governments, will become virtually obsolete.


Welcome to the Deep State's New World Order. Everyone on Earth is controlled. Sounds like Lucifer's plan that made him a dark angel -- an enemy of God and man.


Harold W. Pease, Ph.D., is an expert on the United States Constitution and a syndicated columnist. He has dedicated his career to studying the writings of the Founding Fathers and applying that knowledge to current events. He taught history and political science from this perspective for over 30 years. To read more of his weekly columns, visit LibertyUnderFire.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.