I am watching part one and thought others might enjoy a story about an invasion of the bug people. It starts slow for the ubiquitous character development but comes to a head in the last 10 minutes of Part 1... Now off to view part 2

Shitty Blue states want your wood stoves and forced air furnaces and they are suing the EPA to make standards "stricter". 

Will they make you a felon with your contraband wood stove?

https://ktvz.com/news/ap-oregon-northwes...ng-stoves/

Quote:Attorneys general from 10 states plan to sue the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, saying its failure to review and ensure emissions standards for residential wood-burning stoves has allowed the continued sale of appliances that could worsen pollution.


That means programs that encourage people to trade in older stoves and other wood-burning appliances, such as forced-air furnaces, haven’t necessarily improved air quality, the states say.
“If newer wood heaters do not meet cleaner standards, then programs to change out old wood heaters may provide little health benefits at significant public cost,” the states wrote Thursday in a 60-day notice of intent to sue.

The states involved are Alaska, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Vermont and Washington, as well as the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency.
They allege that the EPA’s current standards aren’t good enough and that even if they were, the agency’s testing and certification program is so ineffective that it has failed to ensure those standards.

The states allege that the EPA’s current standards must be reviewed and that its testing and certification program is so ineffective, it has failed to ensure the existing standards.

The EPA’s Office of Inspector General, in a report released in February, found the EPA’s 2015 performance standards for residential wood heaters was flawed and said the agency has “approved methods that lack clarity and allow too much flexibility.”

“As a result, certification tests may not be accurate, do not reflect real-world conditions, and may result in some wood heaters being certified for sale that emit too much particulate-matter pollution,” the report said.

I've been on YubNub Social since it was recommended on the old Rouge Nation 3 board and it has been buggy as hell for me from day one. There is little content I like and many of the basic features don't work. I do like the format and it was cool getting in on the ground floor, but it really does suck IMO.

Now, I was asked in YubNub messenger by Clouds and Wind if I was one of the members that came from Rouge Nation and we conversed a bit about things going on here. He or she didn't have much of an opinion of Rouge Nation so I kind of told him/her how much I thought it sucked on Yubnub. How they were the last network I'd go to, even after Facebook.

I tried to say it as nicely as possible, but you don't go disrespecting the Rouges when you're on such a shitty platform it makes Facebook seem great. I'll go to Gab long before I bother with YubNub anymore. I was going to try to end my membership somehow, but it's too buggy to do much of anything much less try to quit.

I like it here along with The Patriot Hangout on Tapatalk as well as TOS, except TOS is hanging by a thread for me lately.

So have any of the Rouges continued on YubNub? I'd like to hear some bitching if possible.

ETA:I do like Hans Schultz, he's a good guy.

Mainly posting this here so I can reference later as sometimes it is very difficult to find statistics and articles again months later.

This is a graphical and mathematical analysis of the "AM Hours" where suddenly "strange irregularities happened" such as Vote total additions of 24 to 1 Biden/Trump suddenly added to the tally in the dead of the night.


24 to 1.... I wonder what the polling on that area looked like "before" the so called vote... LOL

https://votepatternanalysis.substack.com...alies-2020

Quote:Executive Summary


In the early hours of November 4th, 2020, Democratic candidate Joe Biden received several major “vote spikes” that substantially — and decisively — improved his electoral position in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia. Much skepticism and uncertainty surrounds these “vote spikes.” Critics point to suspicious vote counting practices, extreme differences between the two major candidates’ vote counts, and the timing of the vote updates, among other factors, to cast doubt on the legitimacy of some of these spikes. While data analysis cannot on its own demonstrate fraud or systemic issues, it can point us to statistically anomalous cases that invite further scrutiny. 

This is one such case: Our analysis finds that a few key vote updates in competitive states were unusually large in size and had an unusually high Biden-to-Trump ratio. We demonstrate the results differ enough from expected results to be cause for concern.

With this report, we rely only on publicly available data from the New York Times to identify and analyze statistical anomalies in key states. Looking at 8,954 individual vote updates (differences in vote totals for each candidate between successive changes to the running vote totals, colloquially also referred to as “dumps” or “batches”), we discover a remarkably consistent mathematical property: there is a clear inverse relationship between difference in candidates’ vote counts and and the ratio of the vote counts. (In other words, it's not surprising to see vote updates with large margins, and it's not surprising to see vote updates with very large ratios of support between the candidates, but it is surprising to see vote updates which are both). 

The significance of this property will be further explained in later sections of this report. Nearly every vote update, across states of all sizes and political leanings follow this statistical pattern. A very small number, however, are especially aberrant. Of the seven vote updates which follow the pattern the least, four individual vote updates — two in Michigan, one in Wisconsin, and one in Georgia — were particularly anomalous and influential with respect to this property and all occurred within the same five hour window.

Less than 50 years ago most could not imagine a world with the internet. Today most can't imagine a world without it. But the internet is dying.

I strongly encourage parents to be very careful in assisting their children in choosing their future careers because many careers have no future. Computers have been around for much longer than many people realize, and the future they have planned, does not include us useless eaters.

We need to think outside of self. It is clear that they see us as parasites to the planet. They believe the planet will only survive if there are less of us. A lot less of us. So who will be the chosen of TPTB?

I have never used ChatGPT but it is becoming all the rage among the masses and among big businesses, now it is projected that by next year the internet will no longer be needed to operate ChatGPT.

What else will be obsolete?

This is just one of those family drama stories that make your head spin..... Are You Serious???


https://www.mlive.com/news/2023/06/ask-a...-dave.html

Quote:[b]Dear Amy: [/b]Four months before my daughter’s wedding, she told me that her uncle (my brother, “Dave”) would make her feel unsafe if he was a guest. She asked me not to invite him.

My daughter is very politically progressive, as are many of her friends, and although she and Dave have always had a good relationship (I thought), he is a conservative voter and has supported candidates we all abhor.

Dave has always been very nice, so my daughter’s request surprised me.

I wrote Dave a very nice note, telling him that we would not be comfortable with him at the wedding and that he would not be invited.

Dave did not respond and did not attend.

Afterward, I sent him a card and pictures from the wedding, all in an effort to make him feel like he was not being totally left out.

I have not heard from Dave since then. When my siblings found out what I had done they were angry with me.

That is just one problem.

Another problem is that Dave has not sent my daughter and son-in-law a wedding gift.

In the past, Dave has given family members wedding checks in excess of $1,000.

She says she was counting on receiving the same type of gift.

My husband says I should drop it – but I can’t. Dave’s behavior is upsetting and embarrassing to me.

How can I get my brother to recognize and change his petty behavior?

Please don’t tell me that I’m the one who started this by not inviting my brother to the wedding. After all, he’s a grown man, while my daughter is young and just starting out.

– Angry in Philadelphia

[b]Dear Angry:[/b] Let’s recap: Your delicate daughter is too frightened to be near a conservative voter to allow her uncle “Dave” to attend her wedding.

She then asks you to do her dirty work for her, and (of course) you do!

Fine – so far, we have only a bride’s prerogative to create her own guest list, and her mother’s choice to protect her from any consequences, which is your prerogative.

You then rub the excluded guest’s nose in this wedding by sending him photos of the event to which he has pointedly not been invited.

But it’s your second “problem” which I believe will enter the Bridezilla Hall of Infamy.

In short: Brides who are too afraid of family members to invite them to a family wedding don’t then get the pleasure of receiving their money.

You seem almost as afraid of your daughter as she is of your brother, but I hope you’ll find a way to courageously tell her that the Bank of Uncle Dave is closed, at least to your branch of the family.

So far, your silent brother is the only family member who is behaving appropriately. He’s steering clear, which is exactly what you have asked him to do.

I know most folks here don't use Twitter and could careless, but this is a dumb move by Howard Hughes 2.0.

Quote:Elon Musk Places 'Temporary Limits' on Unverified Twitter Accounts

Musk—whose purchase of the social media company last year has come under significant scrutiny amid an increase in outages, widespread layoffs and concerns about content moderation—tweeted Saturday afternoon that he is taking new action to combat "extreme levels of data scraping & system manipulation." The platform will temporarily restrict the amount of tweets users can view per day.

Unverified accounts will be limited to viewing 800 posts each day, while new accounts that have not been verified will be limited to only 400 posts per day, Musk wrote.

Even those who have purchased the premium Twitter Blue will be limited in how many tweets they can view. These users alongside those who are verified will be able to see 8,000 posts per day, according to Musk.

Musk has not responded to the backlash, instead tweeting, "Rate limited due to reading all the posts about rate limits."



Musk initially announced the limitations as being lower before amending those numbers. He first said that unverified accounts would be limited to 600, new unverified accounts to 300 and verified users to 6,000 tweets per day.

Newsweek reached out to Musk via SpaceX and Tesla's press emails. After purchasing the social media platform, Musk disbanded the company's public relations team, so no press contact for Twitter could be reached.

The limitations are the latest controversy since Musk's Twitter takeover. Musk announced earlier this year that he would dismantle Twitter's "legacy" verification program, which allowed prominent individuals to be verified to differentiate themselves from parodies or impersonators. Instead, verification now comes from a Twitter Blue account. Meanwhile, Twitter has also seen an uptick in hate speech amid his pledge to prioritize free speech on the platform.

Internal revenue documents reported by The New York Times last month found that advertising revenue dropped 59 percent in the five weeks between April 1 and the first week of May amid these controversies.

I still predict these crooked people are going to stack the supreme court. If you want abortion, or affirmative action against Federal non-discrimination laws there is an easy way to do it.... pass a damn bill through congress. But that is not the play here, the play is to stack the court so that they can 'Really" legislate from the bench as they have been doing in these lower courts which are actually intervening in legally passed bills and laws.


https://www.channel4.com/news/supreme-co...-committee

Caroline Fredrickson is a visiting professor at Georgetown University Law Centre, and a member of President Biden’s expert commission on reforming the Supreme Court. 


Democrats Hound Biden To Pack The Supreme Court, Establish Term Limits After More Decisions They Don’t Like

https://dailycallernewsfoundation.org/20...dont-like/

Quote:“People don’t have to live under constant fear of the Supreme Court. We can’t sit on our hands while these justices carry out the bidding of right wing organizations,” Democratic Minnesota Sen. Tina Smith said via Twitter on Friday. “Expand the court.”
In 2021, Biden established a commission to review possible reforms to the Supreme Court in an executive order, including looking into changes to its “membership and size,” according to a White House press release. Critics of the move pointed to C-SPAN footage from 1983, where Biden said that packing the court “was a bonehead idea.”

Organizations have also been jumping into the controversy. Planned Parenthood, in a press release, said, “The courts have been used as a vehicle to advance a dangerous agenda against abortion rights — federal court reform is essential for the fight for reproductive freedom,” calling for an expansion of both the number of judges on the federal district courts and the Supreme Court as well as imposing term limits on justices.

Robert Reich, former Secretary of Labor under Clinton and liberal activist, said on Twitter that the Supreme Court is “off the rails,” suggesting term limits, rotating, justices, and expanding the court. “One thing is for certain: we can’t allow the extremists and Big Money interests who have hijacked the Court to go unchecked,” he said.

In not so surprising news, as we approach the 2024 election, Facebook has hired a 20 year CIA veteran who was in the "censorship" branch previously to run their elections policies?

Yeah..... 


https://thefreethoughtproject.com/be-the...n-policies

Quote: Meta recently appointed Aaron Berman, an ex-CIA agent, to take charge of its Elections Policies. Berman, who previously led the misinformation team at the company during the 2020 elections, now occupies a prominent position with extensive oversight over elections-related content across the globe.


The move is part of the revolving door between the intelligence community and social media platforms.
Aaron Berman boasts a career that spans nearly two decades with the CIA, from March 2002 to July 2019, Breitbart reported. During his tenure, he wielded significant influence, assuming various roles including editing and writing for the President’s Daily Brief – a high-profile classified document prepared every morning for the President of the United States by the intelligence community. Besides this, he supervised numerous analysts and managed multimillion-dollar budgets. His wide-ranging duties also encompassed providing briefings to members of Congress and the National Security Council.

Meta recently appointed Aaron Berman, an ex-CIA agent, to take charge of its Elections Policies. Berman, who previously led the misinformation team at the company during the 2020 elections, now occupies a prominent position with extensive oversight over elections-related content across the globe.

The forest wildfires in North America , it has big potential to cause short or longer term health problems . There is probably something else than trees burning too if people smell the chemicals in air .


I think with all current information, it would be wise to have preventive treatment , to maximise changes not to get sick. Here`s some remedys to consider .

-NAC   ( N-acetyl cysteine )  great remedy to take every day for lung/respiratory system clean up . Also assist body to make glutathione. There is also new option called GlyNAC  which have also glycine with NAC , this would probably be better than just NAC alone, thought i never personally used it.

- Selenium , reacts with heavy metals like mercury and help against toxicity

-alpha lipoic acid    assist body to make glutathine and chelates heay metals ( short half life, needs to be taken every 4 hours to keep it there )

- Silymarin Complex   Assist liver

- Vitamin C 

-Magnesium  .  

- Raw garlic or kyolic aged garlic supplement ( has many sulphur compounds , chelates heavy metals )

- Potassium Iodide  or other iodine forms ( needs allways taken with selenium in larger iodine doses )



If money is no issue , liposomal glutathione .  econugenics PectaClear .


Dr.Sircus mentions also bicarbonate/ baking soda , hydrogen and high-quality hemp oil .

Mercury/Radiation Pollution From Forest Fires Emergency Alert to Canadians and Americans

Chlorella algae also help , problem is the low quality Chlorella that has contaminations, like Chinese Chlorella.


In case of cyanide inhalation scenario , B-12 as hydroxocobalamin as antidote .

And obiously a lot filtered clean water daily.


I might forget something ..