CORRUPT Biden DOJ To ARREST JOURNALIST Over J6, Civil War Fears Grow

[Infolurker]

3 years plus later they are now coming after real Journalist.....

Now we know why.

[CoyoteAngel]

3 years plus later they are now coming after real Journalist.....

Now we know why.

Like she said at the end... we all are being subliminally prepped that something g big is coming in 2024 bc election. So we will accept what the have planned to stay in power.  

We are indeed a banana republic with this move.  Its already over!

[Michigan Swamp Buck]

Keep your eyes to the ground, your mouth shut, and obey without question and the feds may not drag you into another false flag like they are saying could happen by November 2024. Don't give them the opportunity to say you were inciting the public and using them like a "tool". Funny how they accuse everyone else of exactly what they do for a living.

There was the reference to the States becoming another "banana republic", a claim that I hear often. A socialist dictatorship for sure, but one I'd rather call a "pineapple republic" because they are using a pineapple when they bend you over.

[SomeJackleg]

although i don't doubt what their saying about the DOJ. the impression i got from mcginnis during the rittenhouse trial and interviews i saw of him on tv and on youtube. he the just didn't report the news, he in was all but inserting himself into the stories. so close that he could almost become part of it.

one of the new commando style reporters. it's not hard to see how a prosecutor might think the same.

[Ninurta]

"Government crushes dissenters"

It was reading headlines like that in the 1970's and 1980's that prompted me to go into the line of work that I did... but those headlines, in those days, were all about overseas situations. Now it has come here.

Stalin, Mao, Lenin, Castro, and Pol Pot would all be proud of their proteges.

I don't go to political rallies, and I don't go to protests. This sort of thing is exactly why. I saw this coming a long time ago. Even in 2019 and 2020, when the Second Amendment was under threat in VA, I didn't go to the protests. There was a big march in Richmond folks tried to get me to go to, and I said not just no, but HELL no. Well why not? Dontcha want to protest for your rights? Nope. I already have my rights. Their problem is going to be taking them away, and they can't do that with any speech or any legislation. They've got to show up HERE, and point guns at me. I'm not about to go traipsing off into the wild and give them an excuse on a silver platter... I'm gonna make 'em work for it.

I don't even care about protests or rallies. No one listens anyhow. All they do is take down names to come after you later. The protest itself is not going to change a goddamned thing, because no one is going to listen, no one is going to pay any attention to what you say unless they can use it to trip you up later with. It's pointless, an exercise in futility.

Now what do you suppose is going to happen when a whole lot of folks realize that? What's the next box to stand on when the soap box isn't working for you because your government isn't listening? When the ballot box is being stuffed by budding totalitarians? When the jury box is being used against you by a malicious government bent on destroying your rights?

Folks, there ain't but one box left to rely on. It's going to get serious when a critical mass of folks realize that.

Ugly ain't even the beginning of it - it's gonna get YOO-gly.

That's why I'm not excited about that "Civil War" movie coming out. From what I've seen, it's pure propaganda and prepping the masses for some truly ugly shit they would not otherwise put up with. I mean, seriously - Texas and California forming an alliance against the Feds? Texas and CALIFORNIA on the same side? Whose fevered mind spawned that load of horse shit? A three-term president? That's been illegal for a long time now. After FDR's 4th term, folks said "sheesh, give it a damn break man! "and passed a law outlawing it. Now WHO do you suppose that 3 term president is supposed to represent? You know, WHO is it we are being massaged to think of as a criminal in office? WHO is it being dragged through court constantly to try to keep from running?

And then THAT prez, the three-term criminal dude, starts bombing US citizens in the movie.

Really?

We are being conditioned. Provocations are rampant, with more coming. Some one, some where, is gonna break, and that's all the excuse they'll need. Don't let that some one be YOU. Prep up, but don't go looking for trouble - trouble will come to you, and soon enough. Pick your battlefield and make them fight on your terms... don't go looking for a fight on theirs.

.

[Snarl]

Funny how they accuse everyone else of exactly what they do for a living.

Yup. In this way ... it is only they ... who are allowed to speak on their narrative line. Still a classic tactic, of driving an opponent who is getting the better of you in debate, off of a website.

There was the reference to the States becoming another "banana republic", a claim that I hear often. A socialist dictatorship for sure, but one I'd rather call a "pineapple republic" because they are using a pineapple when they bend you over.

I've no doubt we're going to see exactly that: A socialist dicktater.

A dictatorship historically follows a failed democracy. Our Republic failed when the people who crave power were allowed to (got away with) calling it a Democracy. People hear things enough and they DO start to believe them.

Eventually ... the dictatorship will be overthrown and either a King will emerge or a new Constitution will be written. I won't be around for that. But ... if ... a new Constitution is written, it is my hope that a scholar will describe the way the United States was undermined and destroyed before quill is placed to parchment.

The new Constitution needs to describe how Government entities and powerful Interests will be immediately charged for any perceived effort to undermine the _individual_ citizens' rights. That in such case a trial will be held within a week of indictment ... and punishment will be carried out in the light of day and open to viewing (and hopefully participation) of the general public.

---

I don't go to political rallies, and I don't go to protests.

And well you shouldn't. Nobody should. Probably ought'a add 'make donations' to those rules too. Nobody's $50 donation is gonna compare to the Koch's financial sway. It WILL get your name indelibly etched onto a list though.

That event in Richmond almost turned out the way it should've, but there were just the right amount of influencers shouting down the gung-ho and calling them Feds (even when they obviously weren't).

There were ten frikkin' divisions of kitted-out light infantry at that rally. They could've slaughtered every paid employee of the Virginia Government and marched on (and taken out) Washington D.C. (including the Pentagon).  No one could've stopped 'em.

Sounds horrible, but in a month no one would give a fuck.

What's the next box to stand on when the soap box isn't working for you because your government isn't listening? When the ballot box is being stuffed by budding totalitarians? When the jury box is being used against you by a malicious government bent on destroying your rights?

Well ... that would be the box magazine. 

Ugly ain't even the beginning of it - it's gonna get YOO-gly.

We both know it. What you're not taking into consideration is that the gooberment WILL go there. Just take one look at recent history ... and the lawlessness (not to mention corruption) of damn near every elected federal official.

YOO-gly indeed. Only way that's not happening if today's jack-booted nazis don't form skirmish lines. And, I'm sure we both know their intent is to collect their paychecks.

Personally, I think there won't be a better time to make something happen than the day they de-dollarize the United States. Too bad the one guy we probably could've gleaned some good information about that didn't stick around here and chat with us.

Don't let that some one be YOU. Prep up, but don't go looking for trouble - trouble will come to you, and soon enough. Pick your battlefield and make them fight on your terms... don't go looking for a fight on theirs.

I'm ready. I'm not gonna wait 'til they come for me though. First Leader who emerges I'm going to rally behind. The BAD is coming for all of us. Some will do the guerrilla warfare thing and they'll ultimately win. But, there needs to be guys like me that bloody their fucking noses and let 'em know they've got a bad fight on their hands ... and that prices will be paid on BOTH sides of the line.

[Ninurta]

Ugly ain't even the beginning of it - it's gonna get YOO-gly.

We both know it. What you're not taking into consideration is that the gooberment WILL go there. Just take one look at recent history ... and the lawlessness (not to mention corruption) of damn near every elected federal official.

YOO-gly indeed. Only way that's not happening if today's jack-booted nazis don't form skirmish lines. And, I'm sure we both know their intent is to collect their paychecks.

Personally, I think there won't be a better time to make something happen than the day they de-dollarize the United States. Too bad the one guy we probably could've gleaned some good information about that didn't stick around here and chat with us.

Nah, I took the government moving on the citizenry into consideration. There is no doubt they will - they always have, going all the way back to the Whiskey Rebellion under George Washington. Lots of folks talk about how the Army would NEVER fire on the citizens, but that ain't the way it's worked out, ever. They're given orders, they carry 'em out. During the Battle of Blair Mountain, just north of here, they actually DID drop bombs on us.

It's not a theoretical question, and it's nothing new. Some folks just don't want to see what's right in front of their face is all, so they deny it. No doubt there will be some deserters who refuse the orders to fire on their own, but the rest are gonna collect that paycheck, by hook or by crook. It's coming.

I just don't think it would be the T-man doing it. I could definitely see BidenHarris doing it, being as how he's already threatened the citizenry with nukes and F-15's. But Texas and California teaming up against anything at all, much less the feds? Nope. I don't see that happening, ever. They'd both be trying to watch their backs from their "ally", too busy to put any serious hurt on anyone.

What it looks to me like at the moment is we are being prepped to just accept whatever the gummint does, by dividing us against one another, painting any opposition at all as "the enemy" so that no one bats an eye when they toss some grenades at that "enemy"... and, right now, the folks being painted by the gummint as "the enemy" are anyone on the Right, or for that matter just anyone not toeing the Party Line. I can't help but notice how no one on the Left can manage to say "Republican" without adding a "MAGA" in front of that for propaganda effect... as if making America great again would be some kind of sin.

Well, to them I reckon it is.

It's been my observation over the years that when you start messin' with someone's money, that's when shit gets REAL. You can steal their wife or kick their dog, but screw with their money and it's ON!

.

[CoyoteAngel]

Funny how they accuse everyone else of exactly what they do for a living.

Yup. In this way ... it is only they ... who are allowed to speak on their narrative line. Still a classic tactic, of driving an opponent who is getting the better of you in debate, off of a website.

There was the reference to the States becoming another "banana republic", a claim that I hear often. A socialist dictatorship for sure, but one I'd rather call a "pineapple republic" because they are using a pineapple when they bend you over.

I've no doubt we're going to see exactly that: A socialist dicktater.

A dictatorship historically follows a failed democracy. Our Republic failed when the people who crave power were allowed to (got away with) calling it a Democracy. People hear things enough and they DO start to believe them.

Eventually ... the dictatorship will be overthrown and either a King will emerge or a new Constitution will be written. I won't be around for that. But ... if ... a new Constitution is written, it is my hope that a scholar will describe the way the United States was undermined and destroyed before quill is placed to parchment.

The new Constitution needs to describe how Government entities and powerful Interests will be immediately charged for any perceived effort to undermine the _individual_ citizens' rights. That in such case a trial will be held within a week of indictment ... and punishment will be carried out in the light of day and open to viewing (and hopefully participation) of the general public.

---

I don't go to political rallies, and I don't go to protests.

And well you shouldn't. Nobody should. Probably ought'a add 'make donations' to those rules too. Nobody's $50 donation is gonna compare to the Koch's financial sway. It WILL get your name indelibly etched onto a list though.

That event in Richmond almost turned out the way it should've, but there were just the right amount of influencers shouting down the gung-ho and calling them Feds (even when they obviously weren't).

There were ten frikkin' divisions of kitted-out light infantry at that rally. They could've slaughtered every paid employee of the Virginia Government and marched on (and taken out) Washington D.C. (including the Pentagon).  No one could've stopped 'em.

Sounds horrible, but in a month no one would give a fuck.

What's the next box to stand on when the soap box isn't working for you because your government isn't listening? When the ballot box is being stuffed by budding totalitarians? When the jury box is being used against you by a malicious government bent on destroying your rights?

Well ... that would be the box magazine. 

Ugly ain't even the beginning of it - it's gonna get YOO-gly.

We both know it. What you're not taking into consideration is that the gooberment WILL go there. Just take one look at recent history ... and the lawlessness (not to mention corruption) of damn near every elected federal official.

YOO-gly indeed. Only way that's not happening if today's jack-booted nazis don't form skirmish lines. And, I'm sure we both know their intent is to collect their paychecks.

Personally, I think there won't be a better time to make something happen than the day they de-dollarize the United States. Too bad the one guy we probably could've gleaned some good information about that didn't stick around here and chat with us.

Don't let that some one be YOU. Prep up, but don't go looking for trouble - trouble will come to you, and soon enough. Pick your battlefield and make them fight on your terms... don't go looking for a fight on theirs.

I'm ready. I'm not gonna wait 'til they come for me though. First Leader who emerges I'm going to rally behind. The BAD is coming for all of us. Some will do the guerrilla warfare thing and they'll ultimately win. But, there needs to be guys like me that bloody their fucking noses and let 'em know they've got a bad fight on their hands ... and that prices will be paid on BOTH sides of the line.

When the Imposter said you can't fight govt nukes, he should have been promptly educated about HOLDING territory.  You cannot easily accomplish that when the population is as heavily armed as the US is.  You would have to reduce everything to rubble.  And what good is that?

[Ninurta]

When the Imposter said you can't fight govt nukes, he should have been promptly educated about HOLDING territory.  You cannot easily accomplish that when the population is as heavily armed as the US is.  You would have to reduce everything to rubble.  And what good is that?

Funny thing about using nukes - if you use them to deny territory to your opponent, you also deny that same territory to yourself, for the same duration. No one gets to hold any of that territory. Nukes work in an area denial campaign, but it denies the area to EVERYONE. Not so good to hold territory, though.

Personally, I think he was just puffing out his chest, and wouldn't really nuke US areas at all, for the above reason. He was running a bluff, and a bad one, just to try and shake folks up and put 'em off balance.

F-15's on the other hand, I could see him using them... but, luckily, they have far more effective countermeasures than are available with nukes.

"Holding territory" is the gummint's end of a guerrilla conflict. The gummint has to hold turf to deny it to the guerrillas while showing themselves able to make use of it, but the guerillas don't have to hold any turf - holding turf is counterproductive for them, not their goal at all.

The guerrilla's game plan, especially in the beginning, is H+I - Harassment and Interdiction - of gummint personnel, supplies, and equipment... then they jump back into the shadows and move on to the next "holding" target, without trying to hold territory of their own. That way, they are not a sitting duck target, while gummint folks have to be.

So, the guerrillas overrun a gummint base or flash a supply convoy, take what they can use and burn the rest down (to deny it to their opponents), and move on.

While the US did not invent guerrilla warfare, they HAVE perfected it in certain military groups... and some of those folks have moved onward from the military, without leaving what they've learned behind. Those folks can present a real thorn in the sides of TPTB when they try to run their end game.

.

[CoyoteAngel]

When the Imposter said you can't fight govt nukes, he should have been promptly educated about HOLDING territory.  You cannot easily accomplish that when the population is as heavily armed as the US is.  You would have to reduce everything to rubble.  And what good is that?

Funny thing about using nukes - if you use them to deny territory to your opponent, you also deny that same territory to yourself, for the same duration. No one gets to hold any of that territory. Nukes work in an area denial campaign, but it denies the area to EVERYONE. Not so good to hold territory, though.

Personally, I think he was just puffing out his chest, and wouldn't really nuke US areas at all, for the above reason. He was running a bluff, and a bad one, just to try and shake folks up and put 'em off balance.

F-15's on the other hand, I could see him using them... but, luckily, they have far more effective countermeasures than are available with nukes.

"Holding territory" is the gummint's end of a guerrilla conflict. The gummint has to hold turf to deny it to the guerrillas while showing themselves able to make use of it, but the guerillas don't have to hold any turf - holding turf is counterproductive for them, not their goal at all.

The guerrilla's game plan, especially in the beginning, is H+I - Harassment and Interdiction - of gummint personnel, supplies, and equipment... then they jump back into the shadows and move on to the next "holding" target, without trying to hold territory of their own. That way, they are not a sitting duck target, while gummint folks have to be.

So, the guerrillas overrun a gummint base or flash a supply convoy, take what they can use and burn the rest down (to deny it to their opponents), and move on.

While the US did not invent guerrilla warfare, they HAVE perfected it in certain military groups... and some of those folks have moved onward from the military, without leaving what they've learned behind. Those folks can present a real thorn in the sides of TPTB when they try to run their end game.

.

I guerrillas with handguns, shotguns, high power rifles and 'assault weapons' are far more effective than without.  Huge force multiplier and they know it even when they say stupid chit.

[727Sky]

The best way to stop that kind of shit is to cut the head of the snake off; problem is the snake is not a snake but a many headed Hydra so some serious planning would be needed...as there is always a new despot to deal with until the foundation of the group think is destroyed.

If we ever went to war with China; during the CCP annual meeting of the delegates and party members, collapse the building on the 1500+ members... Many conventional explosive devices would do the trick so no nuke is needed. The problem is getting the weapon there unless a missile is used or the new B-21 Raider is as good as the propaganda says it is.

HISTORY..........Dictators and despots can kill many but they will never kill the one who will replace them.