I thought this was April Fools...
![[Image: 6chzD1yW_o.jpg]](https://images2.imgbox.com/9f/08/6chzD1yW_o.jpg)
Quote:April 1, 2026 / Joseph P. Farrell
There will be a certain type of individual out there that will cheer this article, so before you dye your hair pink, or green, or purple, and join "the revolution", let me note that normally I would share the initials of the individual who brought this article to my attention as a way of thanking them. In this case however, the individual who shared it is known by me to be a transgendered individual, who like me is as appalled by what is going on in this Canadian "law" as I am, and presumably many other traditionalists are. I therefore do not today mention those initials in an effort to protect that individual's privacy and security. Here's the story:
Canada’s House of Commons passes ‘anti-Christian’ bill that would criminalize quoting Bible
Quote:Early Wednesday evening, MPs from the Liberal Party and the Bloc Québécois, in a 186–137 vote, passed Bill C-9, known as the “Combatting Hate Act.” Conservatives, NDP, and Green Party MPs voted against the bill in a rare form of unity among the usually opposing parties.
...
In comments sent to LifeSiteNews, Campaign Life Coalition (CLC) blasted the passage of Bill C-9 and called upon “Christians and pro-life advocates to prepare for increasing hostility.”
“With the passage of Bill C-9 in the House, Christians and pro-life advocates will almost certainly face an entirely new level of hostility, as the door swings open to actual persecution under a cloak of supposed legality,” said CLC’s Campaigns Manager David Cooke, who is also a Christian pastor.
Cooke said the Bill C-9 was framed as a law going after “hate,” but, in reality, it is a bill that religious leaders from various faith communities “say could lead to hate-related charges against believers – empowers ideologically-driven police officers and judges to target, for the first time, the very word of God on matters of life, family, and faith.
...
“The battle to defend religious freedom in Canada has now moved to the Senate, which, unfortunately, Justin Trudeau has spent the past decade stacking with anti-Christian bigots like Kristopher Wells, a radical LGBT activist who I suspect will relish the opportunity to criminalize parts of the Bible as ‘hate speech,’” he said.
Now, while I fully suspect that the radicalized LGBT movement may be one of the targeted groups the legislation is designed to secure to the Liberal party of former Prime Minister Justin Turdeau or current Prime Minister Mark Carnage, I suspect that there are other, much deeper backers to the measure, and that the real objective is much more long term, and that the "protected and privileged class" of people are not even enumerated in the LGBT alphabet soup that constitutes modern "inclusivity" and "diversity". I suspect, in fact, that there are two privileged classes that are the real privileged targets, and therefore the real backers, of the bill. The first of these are what I will simply call the "libertine debauched and degenerate", or the LDD, "community". You may remember them if you, like me, lived through the smoky haze of the Woodstock disaster during "the summer of love" in 1969. It was, to be blunt, a drug-hazed sex orgy with booze and rock music. No restraints. None whatsoever. It was libertinism on parade. Had Martin Luther been alive at the time, he might have thought he had died and gone to Muenster.
The second class of people are - in my opinion - the Zionists in all their stripes and varieties. Recall that just in the past few weeks, we have see a Roman Catholic lady dismissed from Mr. Trump's "Religious Liberty" Commission simply for disagreeing with evangelozionism and for maintaining traditional Roman Catholic (and for that matter, traditional Christian) doctrine that the "third temple" is Christ's humanity itself, and hence, the Resurrection and the Church. It has nothing to do with modern political Israel, nor does that view mean one ipso facto hates Jews or is "anti-semitic". But not so according to the "Commission", which promptly forced the lady to resign.
This was followed by denunciations of media personalities Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, and others, for adhering to and advocating similar views and calls for them to be jailed or interred in camps for such views by - you guessed it - a Zionist who maintained that to advocate them was anti-semitic. In other words, the real long term objective here, in my opinion, has nothing to do with "hate speech" or transgenderism or homosexuality or whatever else one may think. The real objective here, the deep politics and deep objective, is to target anyone maintaining that traditional Christian teaching on the Incarnation itself and its implications for "temples" and "blessings". Once that can be branded as hate speech and banished from the marketplace of ideas and the dispensationalist heresy securely enthroned in its place, then it is a free and open field for evangelozionism. One doctrine says that literally everyone is chosen of God because that human nature which Christ took on is common to all; the other denies that, and maintains that there are only the chosen race, and the lesser cattle. The one view built western civilization; the other view is building the rubble in Gaza.
See you on the flip side...
"It is hard to imagine a more stupid or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people who pay no price for being wrong." – Thomas Sowell
