Quote:April 1, 2026 / Joseph P. Farrell

There will be a certain type of individual out there that will cheer this article, so before you dye your hair pink, or green, or purple, and join "the revolution", let me note that normally I would share the initials of the individual who brought this article to my attention as a way of thanking them. In this case however, the individual who shared it is known by me to be a transgendered individual, who like me is as appalled by what is going on in this Canadian "law" as I am, and presumably many other traditionalists are.  I therefore do not today mention those initials in an effort to protect that individual's privacy and security. Here's the story:

Canada’s House of Commons passes ‘anti-Christian’ bill that would criminalize quoting Bible

Quote:Early Wednesday evening, MPs from the Liberal Party and the Bloc Québécois, in a 186–137 vote, passed Bill C-9, known as the “Combatting Hate Act.” Conservatives, NDP, and Green Party MPs voted against the bill in a rare form of unity among the usually opposing parties.
...

In comments sent to LifeSiteNews, Campaign Life Coalition (CLC) blasted the passage of Bill C-9 and called upon “Christians and pro-life advocates to prepare for increasing hostility.”

“With the passage of Bill C-9 in the House, Christians and pro-life advocates will almost certainly face an entirely new level of hostility, as the door swings open to actual persecution under a cloak of supposed legality,” said CLC’s Campaigns Manager David Cooke, who is also a Christian pastor.

Cooke said the Bill C-9 was framed as a law going after “hate,” but, in reality, it is a bill that religious leaders from various faith communities “say could lead to hate-related charges against believers – empowers ideologically-driven police officers and judges to target, for the first time, the very word of God on matters of life, family, and faith.
...
“The battle to defend religious freedom in Canada has now moved to the Senate, which, unfortunately, Justin Trudeau has spent the past decade stacking with anti-Christian bigots like Kristopher Wells, a radical LGBT activist who I suspect will relish the opportunity to criminalize parts of the Bible as ‘hate speech,’” he said.

Now, while I fully suspect that the radicalized LGBT movement may be one of the targeted groups the legislation is designed to secure to the Liberal party of former Prime Minister Justin Turdeau or current Prime Minister Mark Carnage, I suspect that there are other, much deeper backers to the measure, and that the real objective is much more long term, and that the "protected and privileged class" of people are not even enumerated in the LGBT alphabet soup that constitutes modern "inclusivity" and "diversity".  I suspect, in fact, that there are two privileged classes that are the real privileged targets, and therefore the real backers, of the bill. The first of these are what I will simply call the "libertine debauched and degenerate", or the LDD, "community".  You may remember them if you, like me, lived through the smoky haze of the Woodstock disaster during "the summer of love" in 1969. It was, to be blunt, a drug-hazed sex orgy with booze and rock music. No restraints.  None whatsoever. It was libertinism on parade. Had Martin Luther been alive at the time, he might have thought he had died and gone to Muenster.

The second class of people are - in my opinion - the Zionists in all their stripes and varieties. Recall that just in the past few weeks, we have see a Roman Catholic lady dismissed from Mr. Trump's "Religious Liberty" Commission simply for disagreeing with evangelozionism and for maintaining traditional Roman Catholic (and for that matter, traditional Christian) doctrine that the "third temple" is Christ's humanity itself, and hence, the Resurrection and the Church. It has nothing to do with modern political Israel, nor does that view mean one ipso facto hates Jews or is "anti-semitic". But not so according to the "Commission", which promptly forced the lady to resign.

This was followed by denunciations of media personalities Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, and others, for adhering to and advocating similar views and calls for them to be jailed or interred in camps for such views by - you guessed it - a Zionist who maintained that to advocate them was anti-semitic. In other words, the real long term objective here, in my opinion, has nothing to do with "hate speech" or transgenderism or homosexuality or whatever else one may think. The real objective here, the deep politics and deep objective,  is to target anyone maintaining that traditional Christian teaching on the Incarnation itself and its implications for "temples" and "blessings". Once that can be branded as hate speech and banished from the marketplace of ideas and the dispensationalist heresy securely enthroned in its place, then it is a free and open field for evangelozionism. One doctrine says that literally everyone is chosen of God because that human nature which Christ took on is common to all; the other denies that, and maintains that there are only the chosen race, and the lesser cattle. The one view built western civilization; the other view is building the rubble in Gaza.

See you on the flip side...

Quote:But false prophets also arose among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you, who will secretly bring in destructive heresies, even denying the Master who bought them, bringing upon themselves swift destruction.

Quote:Do not be deceived: God is not mocked, for whatever one sows, that will he also reap.

(04-02-2026, 10:31 AM)BIAD Wrote: I'm wondering if King Charlie has had a phone call and advised that 'Defender Of The Faith(s)
has been altered slightly! This may put the Gideons out of work too!

Quote:In this case however, the individual who shared it is known by me to be a transgendered individual,

Quote:In comments sent to LifeSiteNews, Campaign Life Coalition (CLC)

Quote:Justin Trudeau has spent the past decade stacking with anti-Christian bigots like Kristopher Wells, a radical LGBT activist who I suspect will relish the opportunity to criminalize parts of the Bible as ‘hate speech,’” he said.

Quote:Now, while I fully suspect that the radicalized LGBT movement may be one of the targeted groups the legislation is designed to secure

Quote:I suspect that there are other, much deeper backers to the measure, and that the real objective is much more long term, and that the "protected and privileged class" of people are not even enumerated in the LGBT alphabet soup that constitutes modern "inclusivity" and "diversity".

Quote:You may remember them if you, like me, lived through the smoky haze of the Woodstock disaster during "the summer of love" in 1969. It was, to be blunt, a drug-hazed sex orgy with booze and rock music. No restraints.  None whatsoever.

(04-03-2026, 01:40 AM)p358 Wrote: Come on everyone ... obviously an April Fools joke.

Lol

P

(04-03-2026, 01:40 AM)p358 Wrote: Come on everyone ... obviously an April Fools joke.

Lol

P

(04-02-2026, 10:37 PM)Michigan Swamp Buck Wrote: I found some anti-gay stuff in the New Testament, so it's not just the Old Testament as I thought.

Romans 1:26-27, Jude 1:7, and 1Timothy 1:8-11, are examples. Still, the apostles don't instruct Christians to do violence to anyone, and Christ certainly never did. If any religious book should be silenced because of its hate speech, it's the Quran. That is the part that gets to me most, Islam, the most hateful religion on Earth, getting a pass.

Maybe the law addresses the Islamic issue, but the article never mentioned it. I doubt they mention Islam or the Quran directly, or even Jewish beliefs, while they specifically point out Christianity and the Bible.

(04-03-2026, 07:29 PM)Ninurta Wrote:

(04-02-2026, 10:37 PM)Michigan Swamp Buck Wrote: I found some anti-gay stuff in the New Testament, so it's not just the Old Testament as I thought.

Romans 1:26-27, Jude 1:7, and 1Timothy 1:8-11, are examples. Still, the apostles don't instruct Christians to do violence to anyone, and Christ certainly never did. If any religious book should be silenced because of its hate speech, it's the Quran. That is the part that gets to me most, Islam, the most hateful religion on Earth, getting a pass.

Maybe the law addresses the Islamic issue, but the article never mentioned it. I doubt they mention Islam or the Quran directly, or even Jewish beliefs, while they specifically point out Christianity and the Bible.

Are we forgetting that time that he knotted up a rope into a cat-o-nine-tails and wore out a bunch of money
changers in the temple?

.

(04-03-2026, 10:13 PM)Michigan Swamp Buck Wrote: What? 
It ain't a sin to beat up a banker or revenuer. Why, that's the opposite of sinning. You hill folk should know that, after all, it's the Gospel truth.

Next thing you'll be telling me is that tar and feathering a Yankee carpet bagger and sending him outta town on a rail ain't right either.

(04-05-2026, 11:51 AM)YesItsMe Wrote: Typical Canada.
They really are a lost cause up there.
I bet they don't do the same with the Qu'ran.
Gunna' hug on the Muslims while persecuting the Christians.