Net Zero advocates propose ticks to induce red meat allergy as climate solution

[Michigan Swamp Buck]

What is wrong with people these days, esp. the academics? And why the hell is this coming from my home state of Michigan?

Net Zero advocates propose ticks to induce red meat allergy as climate solution sparking backlash

Two ethics professors at Western Michigan University’s Homer Stryker MD School of Medicine, Parker Crutchfield and Blake Hereth, have ignited outrage with a peer-reviewed paper proposing the deliberate promotion of ticks to trigger alpha-gal syndrome (AGS)—a red-meat allergy—to reduce meat consumption and combat climate change. Published in Bioethics, their “Beneficial Bloodsucking” argument frames AGS as a “moral bioenhancer,” asserting that inducing allergies to cattle, pigs and lambs could ethically “prioritize planetary health over personal choice.” The controversial stance has drawn sharp criticism, with opponents calling it a dangerous confluence of pseudo-science and ideological overreach.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2025-08-14-c...lergy.html


Isn't this considered biological warfare against the citizens of your own country, state, city, town, or neighborhood? Isn't this conspiratorial plans about a terrorist bio attack on the United States of America? This is a threat of terror to force people to stop consuming meat, and an actual act of terror if carried out. These are executable offenses they are suggesting, making such plans are high crimes.

[Kenzo1]

Academics have  gone crazy long time ago IMO  

And this meat allergy , it`s caused by something else than ticks , vaccines being prime suspect , the gelatin compound in vaccines.


Alpha-Gal Syndrome and Ticks: A False Trail?



Dont get me wrong, ticks are dangerous because they spread lyme , Babesia , Bartonella .......but this meat allergy is not caused by ticks  IMO .

[Michigan Swamp Buck]

These are the end times when good is evil and evil is good.

First, these are "ethics professors" publishing their ideas in a rag called "Bioethics" under the subject of medical ethics. Does anyone remember the Hippocratic oath? Oh, wait, I don't think any professor takes any kind of oath (except to Lucifer, maybe), and they probably don't consider Hippocrates ethical to begin with.

This term they used in the article, "moral bioenhancer". It is as if a disease carried by a tick has some moral characteristics. I fail to see the morality of encouraging or enhancing a disabling disease with the intention of infecting the entire human population. This anti-morality is entirely Satanic, and these demon-possessed professors can't understand the cognitive dissonance.

The thing is, they have already proven on many occasions they believe that encouraging or enhancing a disabling disease with the intention of infecting the entire human population is moral, even necessary.

[Kenzo1]

These are the end times when good is evil and evil is good.

First, these are "ethics professors" publishing their ideas in a rag called "Bioethics" under the subject of medical ethics. Does anyone remember the Hippocratic oath? Oh, wait, I don't think any professor takes any kind of oath (except to Lucifer, maybe), and they probably don't consider Hippocrates ethical to begin with.

This term they used in the article, "moral bioenhancer". It is as if a disease carried by a tick has some moral characteristics. I fail to see the morality of encouraging or enhancing a disabling disease with the intention of infecting an entire human population. This anti-morality is entirely Satanic, and these demon-possessed professors can't understand the cognitive dissonance.

World has gone full crazy , on many ways , locations ....

I wonder sometimes what Terence McKenna sayed :

"I think it's just going to get weirder and weirder and weirder and finally it's going to be so weird that people are going to have to talk about how weird it is. People are gonna say what the hell is going on. It's just too nuts"