Quote:Net Zero advocates propose ticks to induce red meat allergy as climate solution sparking backlash

Two ethics professors at Western Michigan University’s Homer Stryker MD School of Medicine, Parker Crutchfield and Blake Hereth, have ignited outrage with a peer-reviewed paper proposing the deliberate promotion of ticks to trigger alpha-gal syndrome (AGS)—a red-meat allergy—to reduce meat consumption and combat climate change. Published in Bioethics, their “Beneficial Bloodsucking” argument frames AGS as a “moral bioenhancer,” asserting that inducing allergies to cattle, pigs and lambs could ethically “prioritize planetary health over personal choice.” The controversial stance has drawn sharp criticism, with opponents calling it a dangerous confluence of pseudo-science and ideological overreach.

(8 hours ago)Michigan Swamp Buck Wrote: These are the end times when good is evil and evil is good.

First, these are "ethics professors" publishing their ideas in a rag called "Bioethics" under the subject of medical ethics. Does anyone remember the Hippocratic oath? Oh, wait, I don't think any professor takes any kind of oath (except to Lucifer, maybe), and they probably don't consider Hippocrates ethical to begin with.

This term they used in the article, "moral bioenhancer". It is as if a disease carried by a tick has some moral characteristics. I fail to see the morality of encouraging or enhancing a disabling disease with the intention of infecting an entire human population. This anti-morality is entirely Satanic, and these demon-possessed professors can't understand the cognitive dissonance.