28th August 2023, almost two days after the inicdent.
Every so often, a puzzle is presented in the media due to a couple of things that aren't entirely to do with
the actual subject matter of a report. Usually, it's poor informative facts delivered -not for their accuracy,
but for their 'effective' impact on drawing the correct amount of intrigue to hopefully demand the viewer
or reader to tarry a little longer on their TV channel/website/newspaper.
Take this little tragic riddle.
"Liverpool flood deaths: Two dead after driving car into floodwater" -The BBC.
"Man and woman dead after becoming trapped in car in flooded Liverpool road" -ITVX.
"Man and woman die after Mercedes car driven into flooded area in Mossley Hill, Merseyside" -Sky News.
The titles should say it all, due to 'flooding' -a favoured noun by most left-wing mediums to hint at their Climate Change
agenda, and the outcome of two people dying in the ensuing waters from such a flood. The typical Hollywood reflection
of Britain is it's a rainy country, where everyone carries an umbrella and the residents of this waterlogged Isle have
somehow just offered an upper-lip to the constant inclement weather.
Liverpool is an English city where the average person may automatically assume this tragedy occurred in or around a
large volume of water. Liverpool is on the west coast and again, one might take it the Mercedes car became involved
with tidal issues effected by a large downpour. However, both assumptions would be wrong.
Here's the BBC's version:
The rest of the article is Monday-morning Quarter-backing and blame, the story itself merely offers a puzzling set
of so-called facts solely based on the notion that the mainstream media are not allowed to lie. A fallacy that is
ingrained into the public's psyche by the very people who deliver the daily 'news'.
(BIAD mentions quarterbacking and then performs it himself!!)
So let's take a look at the site where the 'drowning' -which one would accept via the sparce certitudes offered
by the MSM. Here's a Google image of the location of the incident. There are two bridges, one is a 'fly-over'
style where Briardale Road passes over Queens Drive and another bridge that carries four railway racks.
![[Image: attachment.php?aid=1233]](https://rogue-nation.com/mybb/attachment.php?aid=1233)
Here's four images of the exact spot where the incident occurred.
![[Image: attachment.php?aid=1234]](https://rogue-nation.com/mybb/attachment.php?aid=1234)
The reports indicate bystanders, Police, Ambulance and Fire Services were on the scene fairly quickly and
yet, fifteen feet of water was allegedly allowed to congregate beneath the the bridges? Look at the gradient
of Queens Road on either side of the incident.
How much run-off had there to be from the railway and road bridges to have the upmost point of this trapped
-water reach fifteen feet? The BBC article says: "Met Office data shows heavy rainfall at over 32mm (1.25 inches)
an hour"... that's per hour and we're talking about a vehicle that somehow -stalled beneath the bridges and the
occupants sat inside the Mercedes until it led to their deaths or drove at such an alarming speed into a wide
drain-jammed expanse of floodwater that it was only when their car was totally submerged, did the situation
become life-threatening.
From the ITVX article:
"...Eyewitness Rebecca Wilson, 27, passed the area in a taxi and said the water was around 15ft deep.
She believes the flooding may have been caused by a burst pipe. She said: “It looked like a waterfall
coming down from the side of the bridge.
"As I looked back out of the window I turned to my mates and told them I thought I had just seen red lights
under the water and I thought maybe someone had become stuck. "I rang the police just to be safe."..."
Passed the area? Dusk was officially at 20.36 in the UK on the 26th August. One presumes the streetlighting
was working beneath the pair of bridges, but unless Miss Wilson's taxi was actually on Queens Drive before
9.00pm, she wouldn't have seen the submerged car. There are no junctions close to the scene where Miss
Wilson's taxi could have 'passed by' and observed the massive expanse of water! If she was Briardale Road,
the Mercedes would be beneath the taxi and unable to be seen!
Even if Rebecca Wilson's response was accurate, had nobody else driven by, arrived at the edge of water and
seen the submerged Mercedes' lights?!! Remember, the Police say 'they were called to to Queens Drive in the
Mossley Hill area at 21:00 BST' and that 'Passers-by fought to help the man and woman who were stuck inside
a black Mercedes'.
This means for an undisclosed time, no other vehicles used that road, a wide stretch of water accumulated
and was allowed to accumulate, people on foot could somehow get to the underwater site (look at the BBC
photo, look at the steepness of the road going under the bridges) and never at any time is their an interview
with the 'passers-by' who must have swam down to reach the trapped vehicle beneath the fifteen-feet of
water.
................................
A poor piece of grammar, but still: "...Emergency workers took them to hospital, but they were pronounced dead."
I don't expect an immediate report on how they perished as the incident only HAPPENED FREAKIN' TWO DAYS AGO!
I dunno, this stinks to high-heaven to me.
The weather for that date from Weather25.com:
![[Image: attachment.php?aid=1235]](https://rogue-nation.com/mybb/attachment.php?aid=1235)
Every so often, a puzzle is presented in the media due to a couple of things that aren't entirely to do with
the actual subject matter of a report. Usually, it's poor informative facts delivered -not for their accuracy,
but for their 'effective' impact on drawing the correct amount of intrigue to hopefully demand the viewer
or reader to tarry a little longer on their TV channel/website/newspaper.
Take this little tragic riddle.
"Liverpool flood deaths: Two dead after driving car into floodwater" -The BBC.
"Man and woman dead after becoming trapped in car in flooded Liverpool road" -ITVX.
"Man and woman die after Mercedes car driven into flooded area in Mossley Hill, Merseyside" -Sky News.
The titles should say it all, due to 'flooding' -a favoured noun by most left-wing mediums to hint at their Climate Change
agenda, and the outcome of two people dying in the ensuing waters from such a flood. The typical Hollywood reflection
of Britain is it's a rainy country, where everyone carries an umbrella and the residents of this waterlogged Isle have
somehow just offered an upper-lip to the constant inclement weather.
Liverpool is an English city where the average person may automatically assume this tragedy occurred in or around a
large volume of water. Liverpool is on the west coast and again, one might take it the Mercedes car became involved
with tidal issues effected by a large downpour. However, both assumptions would be wrong.
Here's the BBC's version:
Quote:'Two people have died after becoming trapped in their car in a flooded road in Liverpool. Police said they were
called to Queens Drive in the Mossley Hill area at 21:00 BST on Saturday night. Passers-by fought to help the
man and woman who were stuck inside a black Mercedes in deep floodwater. Emergency workers took them
to hospital, but they were pronounced dead.
Amateur footage filmed in the area appears to show water gushing onto the road - which dips under a bridge.
Met Office data shows heavy rainfall at over 32mm (1.25 inches) an hour near where the incident happened.
Flood alerts and warnings remain in place for areas of Merseyside due to the heavy rainfall...'
The rest of the article is Monday-morning Quarter-backing and blame, the story itself merely offers a puzzling set
of so-called facts solely based on the notion that the mainstream media are not allowed to lie. A fallacy that is
ingrained into the public's psyche by the very people who deliver the daily 'news'.
(BIAD mentions quarterbacking and then performs it himself!!)
So let's take a look at the site where the 'drowning' -which one would accept via the sparce certitudes offered
by the MSM. Here's a Google image of the location of the incident. There are two bridges, one is a 'fly-over'
style where Briardale Road passes over Queens Drive and another bridge that carries four railway racks.
Here's four images of the exact spot where the incident occurred.
The reports indicate bystanders, Police, Ambulance and Fire Services were on the scene fairly quickly and
yet, fifteen feet of water was allegedly allowed to congregate beneath the the bridges? Look at the gradient
of Queens Road on either side of the incident.
How much run-off had there to be from the railway and road bridges to have the upmost point of this trapped
-water reach fifteen feet? The BBC article says: "Met Office data shows heavy rainfall at over 32mm (1.25 inches)
an hour"... that's per hour and we're talking about a vehicle that somehow -stalled beneath the bridges and the
occupants sat inside the Mercedes until it led to their deaths or drove at such an alarming speed into a wide
drain-jammed expanse of floodwater that it was only when their car was totally submerged, did the situation
become life-threatening.
From the ITVX article:
"...Eyewitness Rebecca Wilson, 27, passed the area in a taxi and said the water was around 15ft deep.
She believes the flooding may have been caused by a burst pipe. She said: “It looked like a waterfall
coming down from the side of the bridge.
"As I looked back out of the window I turned to my mates and told them I thought I had just seen red lights
under the water and I thought maybe someone had become stuck. "I rang the police just to be safe."..."
Passed the area? Dusk was officially at 20.36 in the UK on the 26th August. One presumes the streetlighting
was working beneath the pair of bridges, but unless Miss Wilson's taxi was actually on Queens Drive before
9.00pm, she wouldn't have seen the submerged car. There are no junctions close to the scene where Miss
Wilson's taxi could have 'passed by' and observed the massive expanse of water! If she was Briardale Road,
the Mercedes would be beneath the taxi and unable to be seen!
Even if Rebecca Wilson's response was accurate, had nobody else driven by, arrived at the edge of water and
seen the submerged Mercedes' lights?!! Remember, the Police say 'they were called to to Queens Drive in the
Mossley Hill area at 21:00 BST' and that 'Passers-by fought to help the man and woman who were stuck inside
a black Mercedes'.
This means for an undisclosed time, no other vehicles used that road, a wide stretch of water accumulated
and was allowed to accumulate, people on foot could somehow get to the underwater site (look at the BBC
photo, look at the steepness of the road going under the bridges) and never at any time is their an interview
with the 'passers-by' who must have swam down to reach the trapped vehicle beneath the fifteen-feet of
water.
................................
A poor piece of grammar, but still: "...Emergency workers took them to hospital, but they were pronounced dead."
I don't expect an immediate report on how they perished as the incident only HAPPENED FREAKIN' TWO DAYS AGO!
I dunno, this stinks to high-heaven to me.
The weather for that date from Weather25.com:
Read The TV Guide, yer' don't need a TV.
