It's always dem wiley jooz, ain't it? It must be, since I hear it everywhere on the internet... I dunno why they didn't just let Hilter kill off all dem jooz.... of course, if they HAD let him do it, then they'd have to find someone else to blame all the world's ill on in the modern age.
I find it highly amusing that most of the folks griping about "dem jooz" also gripe about white supremacists, who ALSO just plain hate "dem jooz". They look to me more like natural allies than folks who ought to be griping about one another, and by that I mean. those Leftists who hates "dem jooz" and those white supremacists who hates "dem jooz" too. Maybe they'll kiss and make up when they finally figure out there ain't a hair's-breadth of difference between 'em.
The short and the long of it is that I don't really care who told who to do what - The "Islamic Republic" should have been done 47 years ago, or in any year since then. The problem is, we never had anyone in the position before who had the testicular fortitude to take the Mad Mullahs out. Now we do, and all the internet wants to do is blame "dem jooz" for upsetting their favorite apple cart.
The Iranians are happy about it. I'm happy about it. the Arabs are getting happy about it since the IRGC started bombing them too just for shits and giggles. Even Al Quaeda associates (in Afghanistan, of all places!) have come out and strangely said "we support Israel for taking out the Iranian Islamic Republic" - because to them the Iranian Shi'a are just a bunch of takfirs, and they back anyone taking out takfir.
So, yeah, the rest of the world can either get on board, or get out of the way. What they aren't going to do is stop Trump from thumping on their pet Moslems by trying to blame the thumpin' on "dem jooz".
.
I find it highly amusing that most of the folks griping about "dem jooz" also gripe about white supremacists, who ALSO just plain hate "dem jooz". They look to me more like natural allies than folks who ought to be griping about one another, and by that I mean. those Leftists who hates "dem jooz" and those white supremacists who hates "dem jooz" too. Maybe they'll kiss and make up when they finally figure out there ain't a hair's-breadth of difference between 'em.
The short and the long of it is that I don't really care who told who to do what - The "Islamic Republic" should have been done 47 years ago, or in any year since then. The problem is, we never had anyone in the position before who had the testicular fortitude to take the Mad Mullahs out. Now we do, and all the internet wants to do is blame "dem jooz" for upsetting their favorite apple cart.
The Iranians are happy about it. I'm happy about it. the Arabs are getting happy about it since the IRGC started bombing them too just for shits and giggles. Even Al Quaeda associates (in Afghanistan, of all places!) have come out and strangely said "we support Israel for taking out the Iranian Islamic Republic" - because to them the Iranian Shi'a are just a bunch of takfirs, and they back anyone taking out takfir.
So, yeah, the rest of the world can either get on board, or get out of the way. What they aren't going to do is stop Trump from thumping on their pet Moslems by trying to blame the thumpin' on "dem jooz".
.
“Trouble rather the tiger in his lair than the sage among his books. For to you kingdoms and their armies are things mighty and enduring, but to him they are but toys of the moment, to be overturned with the flick of a finger.”
― Gordon R. Dickson, Tactics of Mistake
― Gordon R. Dickson, Tactics of Mistake