The authors are attempting to hide a core of authoritarianism behind a thin veil of projected "morality". There is no morality in attempting to be overlords over others, and trying to force their lifestyles into one's own mold. That is not "morality", nor is it "ethical" - it is nothing more than power projection over those deemed to be inferior to one's self.
In this case, it appears the authors are conspiring to commit terroristic acts on their "inferiors", or what THEY see to be inferiors. Conspiracy is a felony, as is terrorism. I don't know why they are still allowed to walk among polite society, or why they are not, this very moment, being housed in Gitmo for their crimes against humanity.
They are neither moral nor ethical. They are authoritarian and terroristic instead. We used to handle such people roughly. Now, it appears, we sit idly by and allow them to write papers spewing their volatile hatred amongst humankind, normal people, people not like them.
.
In this case, it appears the authors are conspiring to commit terroristic acts on their "inferiors", or what THEY see to be inferiors. Conspiracy is a felony, as is terrorism. I don't know why they are still allowed to walk among polite society, or why they are not, this very moment, being housed in Gitmo for their crimes against humanity.
They are neither moral nor ethical. They are authoritarian and terroristic instead. We used to handle such people roughly. Now, it appears, we sit idly by and allow them to write papers spewing their volatile hatred amongst humankind, normal people, people not like them.
.
“Trouble rather the tiger in his lair than the sage among his books. For to you kingdoms and their armies are things mighty and enduring, but to him they are but toys of the moment, to be overturned with the flick of a finger.”
― Gordon R. Dickson, Tactics of Mistake
― Gordon R. Dickson, Tactics of Mistake