They are in danger of overusing "extreme right-wing radical" and right-wing terrorism" and the like just like they overused "racist" and "racism" so much a few years ago that the terms lost all meaning.
The problem is that they apply their pejorative of the day to any and all situations, including most tellingly situation where they have no logical application. Such overuse and misapplication has the net effect of depriving their pejoratives of all meaning, and thus any "power" at all.
15 or 16 years ago, everything that did not agree with the Globalist/ Progressive agenda was labeled "racist", regardless of whether or not race, or even people, were involved. I don't know how many times I was labeled as a "racist" back then, but eventually I took to wearing the term as a badge of honor - it only meant that I had gotten under some Globalist/ progressive skin, and nothing more.
It got even more amusing by the time they started claiming that "race does not exist" - well, if race does not exist, then how in the hell can anyone at all be "racist"? Yet they would use both terms as if they were both true, when one or the other, and possibly both, could not possibly be true, since they were in 180 degree opposition.
Flash forward a few years, and "right wing (fill in the blank)" is now the pejorative of the day, and is being vastly overused and misused. "Right wing", by definition, is every bit as Socialist as Left-wing. The association is with "nazism" and "fascism", both of which are just as socialist as communism - they are all "authoritarian collectivist" philosophies, and collectivism is the defining trait of socialist systems.
They are seeking only to tar people by demonizing them with the "nazi" or "fascist" brush. Not because they are actually nazis or fascists, which most of them are not, but because most folks can agree that nazism and fascism are evil things, making people targeted by such labels "evil" by synthetic, manufactured association... and thereby dehumanizing them so that they can be "legitimately" targeted by the collectivist masses.
However, in the attempt, they are over-using and mis-using all of those terms, usually in situations where they do not and can not apply, and will eventually reach a point where the terms have no meaning, just like they did with "racism".
.
The problem is that they apply their pejorative of the day to any and all situations, including most tellingly situation where they have no logical application. Such overuse and misapplication has the net effect of depriving their pejoratives of all meaning, and thus any "power" at all.
15 or 16 years ago, everything that did not agree with the Globalist/ Progressive agenda was labeled "racist", regardless of whether or not race, or even people, were involved. I don't know how many times I was labeled as a "racist" back then, but eventually I took to wearing the term as a badge of honor - it only meant that I had gotten under some Globalist/ progressive skin, and nothing more.
It got even more amusing by the time they started claiming that "race does not exist" - well, if race does not exist, then how in the hell can anyone at all be "racist"? Yet they would use both terms as if they were both true, when one or the other, and possibly both, could not possibly be true, since they were in 180 degree opposition.
Flash forward a few years, and "right wing (fill in the blank)" is now the pejorative of the day, and is being vastly overused and misused. "Right wing", by definition, is every bit as Socialist as Left-wing. The association is with "nazism" and "fascism", both of which are just as socialist as communism - they are all "authoritarian collectivist" philosophies, and collectivism is the defining trait of socialist systems.
They are seeking only to tar people by demonizing them with the "nazi" or "fascist" brush. Not because they are actually nazis or fascists, which most of them are not, but because most folks can agree that nazism and fascism are evil things, making people targeted by such labels "evil" by synthetic, manufactured association... and thereby dehumanizing them so that they can be "legitimately" targeted by the collectivist masses.
However, in the attempt, they are over-using and mis-using all of those terms, usually in situations where they do not and can not apply, and will eventually reach a point where the terms have no meaning, just like they did with "racism".
.
“Trouble rather the tiger in his lair than the sage among his books. For to you kingdoms and their armies are things mighty and enduring, but to him they are but toys of the moment, to be overturned with the flick of a finger.”
― Gordon R. Dickson, Tactics of Mistake
― Gordon R. Dickson, Tactics of Mistake