+- Rogue-Nation Discussion Board (https://rogue-nation.com/mybb)
+-- Forum: Rogue Politics (https://rogue-nation.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=47)
+--- Forum: Political news and more (https://rogue-nation.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=50)
+--- Thread: Don't like Uncontrolled Migration then you could be a Terrorist (/showthread.php?tid=2839)
Don't like Uncontrolled Migration then you could be a Terrorist - gortex - 06-07-2025
That's the opinion of "Prevent" an organisation set up by the last Labour government in 2005 , Prevent are an organisation that "deradicalizes" potential terrorists who are sent to them although some of our terror attacks were committed by "deradicalized" terrorists.
In guidance to local authorities , hospitals and police "Prevent" set their definition of what is or could be Extreme Right-Wing Terrorism , judge for yourself.
Quote:https://www.protectuk.police.uk/threat-risk/threat-analysis/threat-extreme-right-wing-terrorism
- Cultural Nationalism is a belief that ‘Western Culture’ is under threat from mass migration into Europe and from a lack of integration by certain ethnic and cultural groups. The ideology tends to focus on the rejection of cultural practices such as the wearing of the burqa, or the perceived rise of the use of sharia law. In the UK this has been closely associated with anti-Islam groups.
- White Nationalism is a belief that mass migration from the ‘non-white’ world, and demographic change, poses an existential threat to the ‘White Race’ and ‘Western Culture’. Advocates for some sort of ‘White’ homeland, either through partition of already existing countries, or by the repatriation of ethnic minorities, by way of force if necessary.
Soooo , half the UK then.
RE: Don't like Uncontrolled Migration then you could be a Terrorist - Ninurta - 06-07-2025
They are in danger of overusing "extreme right-wing radical" and right-wing terrorism" and the like just like they overused "racist" and "racism" so much a few years ago that the terms lost all meaning.
The problem is that they apply their pejorative of the day to any and all situations, including most tellingly situation where they have no logical application. Such overuse and misapplication has the net effect of depriving their pejoratives of all meaning, and thus any "power" at all.
15 or 16 years ago, everything that did not agree with the Globalist/ Progressive agenda was labeled "racist", regardless of whether or not race, or even people, were involved. I don't know how many times I was labeled as a "racist" back then, but eventually I took to wearing the term as a badge of honor - it only meant that I had gotten under some Globalist/ progressive skin, and nothing more.
It got even more amusing by the time they started claiming that "race does not exist" - well, if race does not exist, then how in the hell can anyone at all be "racist"? Yet they would use both terms as if they were both true, when one or the other, and possibly both, could not possibly be true, since they were in 180 degree opposition.
Flash forward a few years, and "right wing (fill in the blank)" is now the pejorative of the day, and is being vastly overused and misused. "Right wing", by definition, is every bit as Socialist as Left-wing. The association is with "nazism" and "fascism", both of which are just as socialist as communism - they are all "authoritarian collectivist" philosophies, and collectivism is the defining trait of socialist systems.
They are seeking only to tar people by demonizing them with the "nazi" or "fascist" brush. Not because they are actually nazis or fascists, which most of them are not, but because most folks can agree that nazism and fascism are evil things, making people targeted by such labels "evil" by synthetic, manufactured association... and thereby dehumanizing them so that they can be "legitimately" targeted by the collectivist masses.
However, in the attempt, they are over-using and mis-using all of those terms, usually in situations where they do not and can not apply, and will eventually reach a point where the terms have no meaning, just like they did with "racism".
.