(06-02-2024, 12:15 PM)FlickerOfLight Wrote:(06-02-2024, 11:45 AM)Bally002 Wrote:(06-02-2024, 10:01 AM)FlickerOfLight Wrote:My thoughts are, why haven't Trumps Attorney's raised this and/or looked into it if that law is legit. Raising it and asking questions would require people like Stormy, who claims to have received hush money some years ago to either declare that money to the IRS or have to admit in light of the circumstances that this allegation was not so.(06-02-2024, 09:56 AM)Bally002 Wrote:(06-02-2024, 08:51 AM)FlickerOfLight Wrote: From what I know, you are correct. And this would in fact criminalize just about our entire government.
But, they get to play by a different set of rules. Rules they change to shift the lines of what is a criminal offense, and what wins elections. Not to mention the other things that go on behind the curtains that would be considered a criminal offense if anyone of us did these things.
This whole display (trial) just shows us how the justice system is corrupt and weaponized. Fact is, it has been this way for a very long time. Ask anyone who has gotten wrapped up in that "system" we call "justice."
To be clear, from what I know, yes, there would be a lot of people go down for "tax evasion" if the IRS were to go after that in particular. The problem is, the IRS is in "their" pockets and is weaponized for their own devices.
Good point to the OP. But sadly, it doesn't matter. It's not something the IRS would ever go after. But Lord forbid if one of us received a lil something something on the side, and didn't declare it. They'd take everything we had....and more.
Yeah thanks for the clarification. I was thinking more along the lines of people like 'Stormy Daniels unless she has the IRS in her 'pocket'.
Kind regards,
Bally
Oh, in her case, if she received "hush money" and did not declare it to the IRS they could nail her butt to the wall of the prison. If they wanted to.
I am sure to save her butt she would prefer a charge of tax evasion for that sum rather than perjury. That would lead to the truth of that matter in circumspect.
To exploit that fact, a good defence team would raise it. This way Stormy would have to face public scrutiny and I would be sure she would raise all hell for any others not included being politicians, judges, jurors or AG's.
It's a nagging thing for me but I'm not across USA law. I am with Westminster and codified laws and statutes here. I sincerely hope that this may be looked into by Trumps team.
My thoughts,
Bally)
The knowledge of the law I have comes mostly from having a cop as a dad. He taught me the law. As well as taught me how the justice system actually wrecks the law. This is why lawyers are seen as the most evil people on earth (in the eyes of a lot of people. If any lawyers are reading this I don't mean you. I'm sure you're a nice person who has done nothing but good).
Really truly you probably are completely right. All of that could of possibly worked.
But if the system is corrupt then they can make whatever outcome they want. This shows us, even regardless of money or position if they want you they can get you.
The system, as it looks from the ground floor where I stand, it has always been known as two different systems. One for the ones who have money. The system works just fine for them. And then for Those who have do not have money, the system bends them over....literally.
This is a major flex because it breaks that mold. This shows the world that no one is immune to defying their new system their about to deploy (NWO).
That's the way I see it anyways.
I've been through the system. I've seen its inner workings. If I had money, I wouldn't truly know that system.
If that helps.
Yeah, cheers mate. I was a cop for many years in a couple of state and territory jurisdictions I saw fairness and unfairness in court. Some decisions at which I scratched my head so I learnt to be very thorough with my arrest briefs and statements. Eventually taught all aspects at the police college.
Bally)