Just adding this on.
How close are we to nuclear war with Russia? Well, if the panic, hysteria and nuclear rhetoric on the interwebs, coupled with our insane globalist regimes are any indicator it sounds danger close.
What are the odds that any F-16s buzzing around over there are in fact piloted by American and/or other western pilots?
^^ If that is true then the British regime have lost their minds.
Briefly Noted: Russia's Nuclear Message
A tell-tale warning about what is perhaps really going on here...
Let that sink in for a minute as to how the Russian leadership are thinking concerning their escalation strategies. If the monster called NATO continues in their current form we are going to have these "wag the dog" scenarios. Like the Germans threatening to send cruise missiles to the Ukraine for carrying out strikes within Russia territory which according to the top article, David Cameron in the UK had already "green lit" for the crazy nuts in Kiev.
By degrading and allowing our own conventional forces to the extent they are now, especially with all the wokery doctrine being promoted within is telling in that the West has no means of escalation in a conventional sense.
We have no conventional weapons to escalate an intimidating response with and even if we did as Col Macgregor points out, we would lose. The logistics nightmare alone would kill us. Ukraine is learning this the hard knox WWI way.
The nuclear weapons the Ruskies are talking about deploying are tactical... small yield and perhaps "clean" weapons. Meaning the "fallout" is much more contained and not like the cold war nuke detonations in Nevada and elsewhere. Even so, with Russia using tactical nukes in Ukraine and with the prevailing winds would carry fallout onto Russian soil. So, either the Russian nukes of today's generation are much more cleaner and devoid of the massive amounts of fallout of the past and thereby (in the minds of madmen) make a nuclear war fightable and winnable. Now, that's a big problem. Note that most of America's strategic nuclear weapons are running on outdated and obsolete delivery systems. We (USA) have not updated our ICBMs (except for the nuclear core) since the Minuteman III, a project started under JFK. That's how old the missiles are. We do have updated airplane deliverable bombs and submarine launched missiles, but if the recent experience with the UK Royal Navy inability to carry out successful launches which are supplied by US Navy and American tech, then we are dealing with an old worn out nuclear deterrent. The Russians know this better than whatever is printed in the media.
Meanwhile, the Russians have continued to update & upgrade their nuclear arsenal. They have designer nukes or what is called dial-a-yield which makes them tactical and possibly much "cleaner". We (USA) have the same but how well do they work? Nobody has done a live test since early 90s.
The Medvedev threat is along the lines of we know where all your bunkers are located and aside from worrying about bombs dropping on your bunker command & control hideouts we also have "wet-work" teams on standby to decapitate your leadership. As the West (USSA, London, Paris, Berlin) & NATO escalate, the Russians will now escalate in kind. I'm expecting more escalated sabotage this summer.
Meanwhile, on the front lines...
I guess Blinken the other night singing "Rockin' in the Free World" in a Kiev bar was a mocking goodbye to Ukraine. I dunno, just not normal nor what is real anymore on the Geopolitical lines.
How close are we to nuclear war with Russia? Well, if the panic, hysteria and nuclear rhetoric on the interwebs, coupled with our insane globalist regimes are any indicator it sounds danger close.
What are the odds that any F-16s buzzing around over there are in fact piloted by American and/or other western pilots?
^^ If that is true then the British regime have lost their minds.
Briefly Noted: Russia's Nuclear Message
A tell-tale warning about what is perhaps really going on here...
Quote:Western leaders are ‘infantile morons’ – Medvedev
The US, the UK, France and other Western nations [Germany] should take a Russian nuclear drill as a reminder of where escalation of the Ukraine conflict could take them, former President Dmitry Medvedev has said.
On Monday, the Russian Defense Ministry announced an imminent exercise to test the capability to deploy non-strategic nuclear weapons. It said the training was ordered by President Vladimir Putin after “provocative statements and threats” by Western officials.
Medvedev, who serves as deputy head of the Russian Security Council, referred to debates in the West about possible deployment of NATO troops to Ukraine, as well as “active encouragement [of Kiev] to use [Western] missile weapons against the entire Russian territory” as grounds for the drill.
Russia “will have to respond” to the proposed deployment of Western soldiers, “and this response will not be” in Ukraine, the Russian official warned. In that case “there will be no hiding on Capitol Hill, in the Elysee Palace or at 10 Downing Street.”
The situation is comparable to the Cuban missile crisis of 1962, according to Medvedev. He said current Western elites were “infantile morons” who refuse to see the risk, unlike US President John F. Kennedy and Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev, who managed to walk back the escalation six decades ago.
Let that sink in for a minute as to how the Russian leadership are thinking concerning their escalation strategies. If the monster called NATO continues in their current form we are going to have these "wag the dog" scenarios. Like the Germans threatening to send cruise missiles to the Ukraine for carrying out strikes within Russia territory which according to the top article, David Cameron in the UK had already "green lit" for the crazy nuts in Kiev.
By degrading and allowing our own conventional forces to the extent they are now, especially with all the wokery doctrine being promoted within is telling in that the West has no means of escalation in a conventional sense.
We have no conventional weapons to escalate an intimidating response with and even if we did as Col Macgregor points out, we would lose. The logistics nightmare alone would kill us. Ukraine is learning this the hard knox WWI way.
The nuclear weapons the Ruskies are talking about deploying are tactical... small yield and perhaps "clean" weapons. Meaning the "fallout" is much more contained and not like the cold war nuke detonations in Nevada and elsewhere. Even so, with Russia using tactical nukes in Ukraine and with the prevailing winds would carry fallout onto Russian soil. So, either the Russian nukes of today's generation are much more cleaner and devoid of the massive amounts of fallout of the past and thereby (in the minds of madmen) make a nuclear war fightable and winnable. Now, that's a big problem. Note that most of America's strategic nuclear weapons are running on outdated and obsolete delivery systems. We (USA) have not updated our ICBMs (except for the nuclear core) since the Minuteman III, a project started under JFK. That's how old the missiles are. We do have updated airplane deliverable bombs and submarine launched missiles, but if the recent experience with the UK Royal Navy inability to carry out successful launches which are supplied by US Navy and American tech, then we are dealing with an old worn out nuclear deterrent. The Russians know this better than whatever is printed in the media.
Meanwhile, the Russians have continued to update & upgrade their nuclear arsenal. They have designer nukes or what is called dial-a-yield which makes them tactical and possibly much "cleaner". We (USA) have the same but how well do they work? Nobody has done a live test since early 90s.
The Medvedev threat is along the lines of we know where all your bunkers are located and aside from worrying about bombs dropping on your bunker command & control hideouts we also have "wet-work" teams on standby to decapitate your leadership. As the West (USSA, London, Paris, Berlin) & NATO escalate, the Russians will now escalate in kind. I'm expecting more escalated sabotage this summer.
Meanwhile, on the front lines...
Quote:Russia amasses over half a million troops at Ukrainian border (May 15, 2024)
In a significant escalation, Russia has deployed over 500,000 troops along the Ukrainian border, a move analysts describe as a direct attempt to overwhelm Ukrainian defenses. The dramatic increase in troop numbers places immense pressure on Ukraine, which relies heavily on Western support.
Dr Jack Watling of the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) emphasized the gravity of the situation, saying, "The Russian forces have now expanded to 510,000 troops. The outlook for Ukraine is bleak. Its allies must replenish stockpiles." This stark assessment underscores the urgent need for continued and enhanced support from Western allies to sustain Ukraine's resistance.
The intensification of Russian military presence has resulted in heightened activity in northern Ukraine, particularly threatening Kharkiv, Ukraine's second-largest city. Images from the region show significant military deployments and the aftermath of strikes, which continue to destabilize the area.
Amidst these developments, US secretary of state Antony Blinken visited Kyiv to reaffirm US commitment to Ukraine. "We know this is a challenging time. But US aid is going to make a real difference against the ongoing Russian aggression on the battlefield," Blinken asserted during his visit. His trip follows the recent approval of a $60 billion support package by Congress, aimed at bolstering Ukraine's defense capabilities against the ongoing Russian onslaught.
I guess Blinken the other night singing "Rockin' in the Free World" in a Kiev bar was a mocking goodbye to Ukraine. I dunno, just not normal nor what is real anymore on the Geopolitical lines.
"It is hard to imagine a more stupid or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people who pay no price for being wrong." – Thomas Sowell