Trump Takes Orders From Netanyahu

[kwaka]

Marco Rubio admits Israel dragged to USA into war

[LightAngel]

MTG claims that the Iran attack is to distract from the Epstein files. Longer term, this conflict will be used by Trump to consolidate his power and disrupt the mid term elections.

I think many of us from this forum already know many of the things she say.

But I think the video is AI.

[Ninurta]

MTG claims that the Iran attack is to distract from the Epstein files. Longer term, this conflict will be used by Trump to consolidate his power and disrupt the mid term elections.

I think many of us from this forum already know many of the things she say.

But I think the video is AI.

Yes, the video is AI. Watch the eye blinks in the AI Greene, and then compare that against a known video of a live person. AI adds in many extra eye blinks to try to make the subject appear more "real".

There are also a number of motion "glitches" as if a couple up to a few frames were just dropped out, without the audio suffering the same glitches. It reminds me of a more subdued version of Max Headroom.

I believe the script was also written by AI, because of the unnecessary superlatives - "I posted a message that shook the political world";  "Now HERE is where it gets truly dangerous..."; "but what it actually does...";  "asked the question everyone was thinking..."; Now, I need you to do something right now..."... the voice is pure MTG, but the phrasing is not. It's out of character, and designed to "funnel" the viewer's thinking into a single narrow lane.

Pure AI.



.

[EndtheMadnessNow]

I hate to admit it, but for once I agree with this idiot. Maybe they are finally driving me insane too.


https://x.com/ChrisVanHollen/status/2028998993166905494

In the meantime I'll keep telling myself it'll all work out in the end. Not yet sure what that "end" is going to entail. As the world turns.

[gortex]

The British government knew some weeks ago a strike on Iran was "likely" to happen as conversations our man in Tel Aviv , Ambassador Simon Walters was having with officials signalled that , he relayed the information to the government yet our failed PM and team of incompetents did nothing , the only thing they're adept at it seems.

Mr Kotecha said the government's limited response to the crisis in part pointed to a lack of preparedness by the UK for war following decades of defence cuts.

The former diplomat praised Simon Walters, the British ambassador in Tel Aviv, who he said is "excellent" and "very well plugged into the Israeli system".

"He was following Israeli intentions vis-a-vis Iran for weeks, and it was highly likely that the Israelis and the Americans were going to strike Iran," Mr Kotecha said in an interview.

"He was aware of that. He was having those conversations. He was reporting those conversations back to London, as is his job and as you would expect, for weeks before the first missiles, the first American strikes, I should say, happened."

https://news.sky.com/story/foreign-offic...o-13516200

Our failure to send HMS Dragon to protect Cyprus and have the EU send their ships is nothing short of a National embarrassment.


 On yer bike Chuckles !!!

[Kenzo1]

I hate to admit it, but for once I agree with this idiot. Maybe they are finally driving me insane too.


https://x.com/ChrisVanHollen/status/2028998993166905494

In the meantime I'll keep telling myself it'll all work out in the end. Not yet sure what that "end" is going to entail. As the world turns.

A U.S. intelligence report  just told the Washington Post that a large-scale war is unlikely to remove Iran's regime.

Their OWN analysts are saying it won't work

Intel report warns large-scale war ‘unlikely’ to oust Iran’s regime

[Moon68]

Article is paywalled but it raises a question with me.

How the F did a rag publication get a classified report of ongoing assessments?

Who gave it to them if it's real?

Smells fishy to me.

[SomeJackleg]

Article is paywalled but it raises a question with me.

How the F did a rag publication get a classified report of ongoing assessments?

Who gave it to them if it's real?

Smells fishy to me.

here it is with no paywall,

Intel report warns large-scale war 'unlikely' to oust Iran’s regime

here is a interesting part, 

It does not appear that the intelligence report examined other possible scenarios, including sending U.S. ground troops into Iran or arming the country’s ethnic Kurds to foment a rebellion. It could not be determined whether the large-scale campaign that the classified document examined is identical to the operations now underway.

[Kenzo1]

Article is paywalled but it raises a question with me.

How the F did a rag publication get a classified report of ongoing assessments?

Who gave it to them if it's real?

Smells fishy to me.

I did not pay anything and it let me read it all.  

It is in some other news sites also .

Intel report warned large-scale strikes ‘unlikely’ to topple Iran’s regime before Trump launched war

No idea how they have sources.

[Moon68]

Looks like the summary of findings of the report was based on the Council of Clerics and leadership structure remaining intact.

I'd say day 1 made the report moot with the first strikes.

[Ninurta]

Looks like the summary of findings of the report was based on the Council of Clerics and leadership structure remaining intact.

I'd say day 1 made the report moot with the first strikes.

Not only that, but it also came from the same fine folks who said Iraq had WMD's.

Because of that, I'm not sure that I'd trust them any farther now than we should have then.

The fact is, whatever viewpoint on the war one wants to take, they will find someone out there on the internet more than willing to fuel their particular fire, and who has no scruples about accurately reporting the fuel for those claims.

Flat out lies burn hotter and brighter, actually.

All one has to do is look around a bit, and he will shortly find "support" for whatever viewpoint or stance he wants to take. Finding actual objective reporting is quite a bit harder, and requires a deeper scour of the "sources".

.

[Ninurta]

Looks like the summary of findings of the report was based on the Council of Clerics and leadership structure remaining intact.

I'd say day 1 made the report moot with the first strikes.

Not only that, but it also came from the same fine folks who said Iraq had WMD's, and that Hunter's laptop was a Russian "disinformation" plant.

Because of that, I'm not sure that I'd trust them any farther now than we should have then.

The fact is, whatever viewpoint on the war one wants to take, they will find someone out there on the internet more than willing to fuel their particular fire, and who has no scruples about accurately reporting the fuel for those claims.

Flat out lies burn hotter and brighter, actually.

All one has to do is look around a bit, and he will shortly find "support" for whatever viewpoint or stance he wants to take. Finding actual objective reporting is quite a bit harder, and requires a deeper scour of the "sources".

.