Worth a listen about the lies being spread

Bad Lip Reading of.... The US House Of Representatives.... (or they DO actually bug that building!!!)

A puzzler for those interested in current mysteries. A lady in the UK 'vanished' during a daily walk with her dog
beside a slow-moving river. The British media (London really!) are fascinated by this latest incident and are
chomping at the bit to the first in announcing a result.

Speculation is rampant since Covid and the Ukraine are no longer a ratings-grabber and questions must be
asked, but the word 'investigation' these days means simply means running with whatever the Police tell
the media.


Nicola Bulley.

Wikipedia:
'On 27 January 2023, 45-year-old Nicola Bulley disappeared near St. Michael's on Wyre in Lancashire,
United Kingdom, while walking her dog. Lancashire Police's hypothesis is that Bulley fell into the River
Wyre, but despite a search including police divers and helicopters, sniffer dogs and drones, she has not
been found.

On 27 January 2023, Bulley drove from her home in Inskip to the nearby village of St. Michael's on Wyre
where, after dropping her children off at school, she walked along the River Wyre with Willow. At 8:53 GMT,
Bulley sent an e-mail to her employer and joined a Microsoft Teams call at 9:01.

She was last seen at approximately 9:10 on the upper field, walking Willow off the lead. At 9:20, Bulley's
phone was believed to be at a bench in the lower field. At 9:30, the call ended. At 9:33, Bulley's mobile
phone—still connected to the internet—was found at the bench. Willow was found alone near the bench,
and showed no signs of having been in the river.
The dog's harness was found on the ground near the river...'
......................................................................

The Daily Mail asks:

Quote:'Why hasn't Nicola Bulley been found in the river and why was her dog's harness removed?
Fifteen vital questions about mother-of-two's disappearance that are leaving police and family baffled

1. Why hasn’t Ms Bulley been found in the river?

The River Wyre empties into the Irish Sea at Fleetwood, 13 miles downstream. It is tidal for several miles,
until the point where a weir is situated, close to where Ms Bulley disappeared. The water is slow-flowing,
so if Ms Bulley fell into the river, it is difficult to understand why she has not been found – or how she could
have got into trouble in the first place.

2. Could she swim?

Ms Bulley is described as a capable swimmer. She is familiar with the route, which she walks most mornings,
and was dressed appropriately for the cold.

3. Why was the dog’s harness removed?

A disturbing puzzle is why Willow’s harness was found on the ground. If Ms Bulley had wanted to let the dog
run free, she could have simply unclipped the lead. But for some reason, Willow’s harness had been removed.

4. Had the dog been in the water, and maybe Ms Bulley went in after her?

Willow appeared distressed but ‘bone dry’, according to the woman who found her. There was no sign of her
having gone in the river.

5. Why would she leave her phone on the bench?

Ms Bulley’s phone was found on the bench, still connected to a conference call. So whatever happened, there
was no time to end the call or to alert others on the call. But it is possible Ms Bulley deliberately chose not to
terminate the call because she believed she would be returning to it once she had dealt with whatever needed
her immediate attention. Detectives have examined the phone, but so far there is nothing to indicate anyone
but Ms Bulley placed it on the bench.

6. Why was she on mute with no video for her business meeting?

The conference call was a team meeting with colleagues from her firm Exclusively Mortgages.
It started at 9.01am and Ms Bulley dialled in from her phone. Ben Pociecha, the firm’s director, said: ‘It seems
as if she was muted and didn’t have her camera on. She was listening in while walking her dog. The police are
investigating the call.’

It was not unusual for Ms Bulley to attend meetings in this manner. The company is based in Keighley, West
Yorkshire, a 90-minute drive, and there was no need for Ms Bulley to attend in person or even take part beyond
listening.

7. Where was her partner while she was out walking their dog?

Paul Ansell, her partner of 12 years, works as an engineer and the couple often took it in turns to perform the school
run and dog-walking duties. The 44-year-old is believed to have been at the family home when the call came through
telling him Ms Bulley’s phone and dog had been found near the river.

8. Did anyone see her dropping off the children?

The car park next to the school is well used, although there are apparently no CCTV cameras. It was Ms Bulley’s
usual practice to drop off her daughters at 8.30am and then walk Willow to the river, leaving the car near the school.
They would have been visible to motorists as they walked along the pavement of the busy A-road, Blackpool Lane,
for about 200 yards, past the village church, before crossing the bridge over the river and turning on to the towpath.

9. Is the towpath isolated?

The towpath starts in the open before entering a copse at a bend in the river. At least four people appear to have seen
Ms Bulley along the path between 8.43am and 9.10am.

10. Why are there no physical signs along the riverbank?

Although locals have warned about the ‘slippery riverbank’, which is muddy and steep in places, Ms Bulley’s family
have questioned why there are no signs of anyone sliding into the river or desperately scrabbling to get out. But
Superintendent Sally Riley, from Lancashire Police, said ‘parts of the riverbank are treacherous’.

11. Could she have been kidnapped?

Ms Bulley’s father Ernest, 73, has wondered if she was snatched. He said: ‘There was no sign of a slip or falling in,
so our thought was, “Has somebody got her?”. He said he had asked a police sergeant, who had all but dismissed
the theory. But he said: ‘How can you know that? It’s such an isolated area, the only way that has happened is if it
was someone who knew her.’ Lancashire Constabulary have said they do not believe there was any third-party
involvement in her disappearance but are keeping an ‘open mind’.

12. Could she have staged a disappearance?

On the contrary, Ms Bulley was said to have been ‘very upbeat’ and loving her life and her job as a mortgage broker,
through which she had just won a new client. Only the night before, when she saw her parents, ‘her mind was great’,
her father said.

Her mother, Dot, 72, said Ms Bulley had recently bought tickets to watch her children in choir and gymnastics shows,
and had excitedly been planning a spa day treat with her younger sister Louise.

13. What about the ‘abandoned’ house?

An ‘abandoned house’ opposite the river bank where she disappeared was an intriguing early line of inquiry. But the
manor house turned out not to be abandoned, and the owner ‘had a quick look around and she wasn’t there’, searcher
Kev Camplin said.

14. Why is the search taking so long?

Police divers are performing an ‘arc search’, combing the riverbed by moving in a side-to-side motion from bank to bank
– described as a ‘thorough but long’ process. They have also deployed underwater drones, but visibility in the muddy
waters is poor.

15. What do the family think happened?

Ms Bulley’s sister, Louise Cunningham, said yesterday: ‘Somebody must know something.
People don’t just vanish into thin air. There has got to be somebody who knows something and all we are asking is,
no matter how small or big, if there is anything you remember that doesn’t seem right, then please reach out to the
police. Get in touch and get my sister back.’

I really enjoyed this series make by Speilburg. It covers mast all aspects of Ufology. 

This link contains all episodes in order -

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TnCxRzzJ...Lz1Su4AIVz

Quote:Researchers solve one of the Borderlands’ biggest water puzzles

Officially, the U.S. and Mexico share 11 groundwater basins. A new map bumps that figure up to a stunning 72.

The U.S. and Mexico share underground water basins that span more than 121,500 square miles of the Borderlands. But the two countries have no regulations for managing those common aquifers, in part, because historically very little was known about them.

That’s changing. On Dec. 28, researchers released the first complete map [PDF] of the groundwater basins that span the U.S.-Mexico boundary. It demarcates 72 shared aquifers — a striking contrast to the countries’ official count of 11. With water becoming an increasingly precious resource in the southwestern U.S. and northern Mexico, the researchers hope the new map will provide a basis for developing a binational legal framework to regulate the underground waters’ management.

“The lack of a legal framework that regulates the management of transboundary groundwater resources promotes the unsustainable use and exploitation of the resource,” wrote the authors, Rosario Sánchez, a scientist at the Texas Water Resources Institute, and Laura Rodríguez, a graduate student at Texas A&M University.

Their research, published in the book Transboundary Aquifers: Challenges and the Way Forward, builds on previous research that mapped segments of the Borderlands. It shows five shared aquifers between Baja California and California, 26 between Sonora and Arizona, and 33 between Texas and the Mexican states of Chihuahua, Coahuila, Nuevo León, and Tamaulipas. Of these, 45% are considered to be in “good to moderate” condition.

One of the key contributions of the new research was to standardize the way that aquifers are delineated. While identifying aquifers might seem like a straightforward task, the two countries, and even individual states, have different criteria for where they draw the lines.

The researchers started by using those different definitions. “We put together what each state and country was doing, like a puzzle,” said Sánchez. But they realized that the data didn’t line up. “Texas uses geological boundaries, California uses a combination of watershed and geological boundaries, and Mexico uses administrative boundaries — a combination of geological and state boundaries. We realized that we couldn’t follow anyone.”

Instead, they put together their own methodology from scratch, drawing on geologic data from a wide variety of sources including 19th century geological surveys. They determined the aquifer boundaries using geological formations and the type of rock present, as well as waterways, changes in elevation, and topography. “That’s why it took us 10 years,” said Sánchez. “It’s been hard.”


A map shows the 72 shared aquifers along the U.S.-Mexico border


Alfonso Rivera and Randy Hanson, the authors of a 2015 report identifying 11 transboundary aquifers along the U.S.-Mexico border, wrote that the compilation of this geologic data is “an important stepping stone to reconcile how groundwater resources will be shared, governed and managed” as demand for groundwater increases.

Sánchez and Rodríguez hope that, at a minimum, the new research will prompt Mexico and the U.S. to update the official count of the number of aquifers shared between the countries. It also has the potential to prompt border states and the U.S. and Mexico governments to agree on a common methodology for identifying aquifers, and beyond that, a legal framework for managing them.

Felicia Marcus of the Water Policy Group added that maps like the one Sánchez and Rodríguez produced “are helpful for transparency and allow for more engagement of the affected communities,” particularly in resolution of disputes.

Conflicts over groundwater are already here, with widespread drought affecting both Mexico and the southwestern U.S. Meanwhile, New Mexico and Texas are fighting each other in the Supreme Court over groundwater pumping, California is implementing sustainable groundwater regulations, and Arizona is voting on citizen-initiated groundwater management areas — all of which could impact the cross-border aquifers. A legal framework for dealing with the international implications of those conflicts can’t come fast enough.

Some surprises and some not so much IMO.. I will say just because you are seen with someone does not make you guilty too.

The military of the USA says there will be no shoot down of the Chinese balloon which is currently over the USA at an altitude of around 62,000 feet. They supposedly tracked the balloon from China across the Pacific and where it crossed into Alaska, Canada, and finally someplace over Montana, USA. You would think the USA would want to know what type of devices the balloon is carrying but "NO" I guess that might interrupt their woke gender classes or something ? At 62,000 ft they would have to send 4 or more balloons which would end up at different locations to do a complete lights out in the USA via an EMP... Which hopefully they are not that stupid as our ships at sea and submarines have a bite all their own,,,yet... there really are some terribly stupid people around the world in leadership positions.

This is another video producer I tend to watch when he post something new. This particular video has some good points and runs off the rail a few times IMO but the general gist is worth a listen IMO.


I did leave a comment which I very seldom ever do for any channel.

Quote:727sky
0 seconds ago
The president of Mexico needs to know, "“The only solution for bad and violent people are good people that are more skilled in violence.” —— Japanese samurai code Bushido. Much of the government is being paid to look the other way when it comes to the Cartels. Look the other way and get money or stand up and die. The problem is another cartel can offer more money per month to the military honcho and then the military kicks the old out for the new best friend. That happened in Matamoros Mexico (across from Brownsville, Tx) with the Zetas and the Gulf Cartel when Tony the terrible was captured . Several of his soldiers escaped back to Houston for they were duel citizens. That is how it was several years ago and now with the open borders no telling what else is going on ?

So many memories of the start-up and trials and tribulations of getting a web site for friends and like minded individuals that at times it hits me like a huge ocean wave.

I do have and idea or maybe a request for all our old and new members to consider especially BAID... Would it be possible to include Guohua's avatar at both top corners of future banners ? 

Guohua's Avatar banner banner banner banner banner banner banner Guohua's Avatar
banner banner banner banner banner banner banner banner banner banner banner banner banner banner banner banner banner banner banner banner banner banner
Etc Etc sure you get the idea..

Without her desire and many friends who are still here this whole idea for a web site would never have been born. So I never want to see her memory fade... Yep sentimental of me and who would have guessed I could be that way !! Call it the kinder gentler side of push a button and watch them disappear !! hahahah