EndtheMadnessNow's comment about a plan to mount cannons on the moon reminded me of the movie Iron Sky -

https://tubitv.com/movies/451666/iron-sky

Iron Sky 2 was also quite good! -

https://tubitv.com/movies/653732/iron-sk...oming-race

Another strange story debunked by the Why Files

I'm sure some of you know the main points of the Bob Lazar story. For those that don't I will provide a few videos for you to get up to speed.

First up is 'The Bob Lazar tape' produced by Bob and his friend Gene Huff in the early 90's which outlines the main points of his work with Flying Saucers at Area 51. -



Next up is a tape made at an outdoor UFO conference held in 1993 at the Lil Ale Inn in Rachel Nevada.

Several well known speakers on the UFO Circuit were scheduled to appear and I couldn't resist the chance to return to Area 51.
This event was billed as 'The Ultimate UFO Seminar'.

There were a few hundred people in attendance and after the first few speakers it was lunch time. People lined up to go inside The Inn and get their lunch.

I heard a commotion going on with a large excited conversation passing through the crowd and as I looked to where it was coming from lo and behold John Lear and Bob Lazar had showed up! Neither was scheduled to speak but it was cool to see them there!

Bob got in line for lunch and I left my place to go stand near him in line. After getting our plates of lunch I followed him to go sit on the steps of thew patio deck and eat. I didn't want to bother him while eating so I just kept my comment short like "Good crowd today huh?" and small talk like that once in a while.

However Bob became surrounded  by the crowd and was constantly being asked questions by one person after another and so was having a hard time eating his lunch. 

Finally after done eating, the crowd continued to press closer in on him with questions and sort of herded him up to the podium with microphone so everyone could hear the answers.
   
This tape starts with my first question of the afternoon regarding if he could tell us any more details contained in the Government Bible as he called it in the Lazar Tape.

You will see he calmly answers any and all questions put to him including Professors he went to school under etc.

  

Continued next post --->

Quote:Knowledge Ecology International

Below are links to copies of the contracts entered into by the US government for technologies to combat the COVID-19 pandemic. KEI is updating this page as we gain access to more contracts, and less redacted versions. Agreements related to the Medical CBRN Defense Consortium (MCDC) whose agreements are executed by Advanced Technology International (ATI) are noted with “(via ATI)”.

KEI has also created a US COVID-19 contract spreadsheet to track metadata of the agreements, as well as to compare the terms contained therein for intellectual property rights, data, and other topics. (Note: At this time, this spreadsheet is being continually updated.)

KEI maintains a separate page of US government contracts concerning needle and syringe production related to the COVID-19 response.

The list below contains COVID-19-related contracts obtained via Freedom of Information Act requests, Securities & Exchange Commission filings, and HHS reading room files. The bulk of KEI’s database of contracts, however, was obtained via FOIA requests and lawsuits filed by KEI. Linked herein is a comprehensive list of all US government COVID-19-related contracts obtained by KEI via FOIA.

I Am Legend - Cautionary Tale: The Science of I Am Legend - Exploring the History and Current Status of Life-Threatening Viral Infections.

Starring:
* Nathan Wolfe
* Anthony Fauci
* Julie Gerberding
* CJ Peters
* Don Burke
* Laurie Garrett




Legend is not the only pandemic movie where Nathan Wolfe weighed in:



Contagion Network

US bombed Nord Stream gas pipelines, claims investigative journalist Seymour Hersh


Excerpts from Seymour's essay:

Quote:Last June, the Navy divers, operating under the cover of a widely publicized mid-summer NATO exercise known as BALTOPS 22, planted the remotely triggered explosives that, three months later, destroyed three of the four Nord Stream pipelines, according to a source with direct knowledge of the operational planning.
....
What became clear to participants, according to the source with direct knowledge of the process, is that Sullivan intended for the group to come up with a plan for the destruction of the two Nord Stream pipelines—and that he was delivering on the desires of the President.

Quote:There was a vital bureaucratic reason for relying on the graduates of the center’s hardcore diving school in Panama City. The divers were Navy only, and not members of America’s Special Operations Command, whose covert operations must be reported to Congress and briefed in advance to the Senate and House leadership—the so-called Gang of Eight. The Biden Administration was doing everything possible to avoid leaks as the planning took place late in 2021 and into the first months of 2022.

Quote:Over the next several meetings, the participants debated options for an attack. The Navy proposed using a newly commissioned submarine to assault the pipeline directly. The Air Force discussed dropping bombs with delayed fuses that could be set off remotely. The CIA argued that whatever was done, it would have to be covert. Everyone involved understood the stakes. “This is not kiddie stuff,” the source said. If the attack were traceable to the United States, “It’s an act of war.”

Quote:The days were counting down. “The clock was ticking, and we were nearing mission accomplished,” the source said.

And then: Washington had second thoughts. The bombs would still be planted during BALTOPS, but the White House worried that a two-day window for their detonation would be too close to the end of the exercise, and it would be obvious that America had been involved.

Instead, the White House had a new request: “Can the guys in the field come up with some way to blow the pipelines later on command?”

Some members of the planning team were angered and frustrated by the President’s seeming indecision. The Panama City divers had repeatedly practiced planting the C4 on pipelines, as they would during BALTOPS, but now the team in Norway had to come up with a way to give Biden what he wanted—the ability to issue a successful execution order at a time of his choosing.

How America Took Out The Nord Stream Pipeline

The very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common – they don’t change their views to fit the facts; they try to change the facts to fit their views. Stupid people are actually more dangerous and destructive to an environment and a civilization than even evil people. You can try to teach and educate them but no one can fix stupid.

As long as life is confined to one planet that life's existence and extermination have days that are already numbered.

By the 4th generation of those who chose to settle Mars and start terraforming the 63% less gravity of the Martian planet the “Chicken Leg Syndrome” made it impossible for them to ever return and live on Earth . Even rolling around in a motorized wheel chair was just to much of a heavy burden to bare back on Earth's one “G” gravity well.

For those who were birthed and raised on Mars the adversity gave their science a strong desire to get off the planet; but where to go ?

The Martians put all their efforts into building a habitat in orbit around Mars where they could control the weather, gravity, and environment so that they could slowly increase the bone density and muscle mass of future generations.

That had been the plan until the Third generation of Martians were born on the habitat; then things changed.

“Why would anyone want to live on a planet,” was the general consensus of the new race that called themselves Spacers . They could grow and manufacture anything they needed without contending with Earth/Mars quakes, dust storms, bugs, animals, and bacteria that wanted to infect and kill you so why live on a planet that seemed to always have problems for life ?

Those who disagreed were offered a one way ride back to Mars or Earth; their choice....

The Spacer's habitat grew until there were over eight million 7th generation Spacers living and working in the habitat they had created just for themselves.

One year they decided to leave the inner Sol solar system completely as the sun had just expelled a huge CME that would probably send Earth back into the stone age (if they were lucky) and there were doubts that the Mars underground cities would fair much better.. There were cries of, “Come save us from both planets,” but those cries fell upon deaf ears as it was to late for Earth and would soon be to late for the Martians as the huge relentless CME/ micro nova approached.

The habitat was moved to the outer reaches of the solar system where there was plenty of water and other resources their habitat could use to sustain the growing Spacer population . The Space council of 9 were already having discussions about adding another one or two habitation rings once they got into the resource rich environment in what was once called the Ort cloud.

After a few years those left alive on Earth after the CME found out that it is hard to be a hunter gatherer if there is nothing to hunt or gather as even much of the fish and ocean life had died during the relentless heat and radiation from the sun.

You can't fix stupid .

The End

https://lists.youmaker.com/links/hNgAMi1.../qXlJoGRex

Quote:More Than 217,000 Americans Killed by the COVID Jab: Survey Estimate
Health Viewpoints

Joseph Mercola
Feb 7 2023
biggersmaller

(Numstocker/Shutterstock)
You’ll never guess how many have been killed or seriously injured in just the first year. Yet, the FDA and CDC keep pushing the shots, despite their own trial data showing they have no benefit in terms of reducing your risk of hospitalization or death.

• According to a December 2021 survey of 2,840 Americans, between 217,330 and 332,608 people died from the COVID jabs in 2021.
  
• Survey results also show that people who got the jab were more likely to know someone who experienced a health problem from COVID-19 infection, whereas those who knew someone who experienced a health problem after getting the jab were less likely to be jabbed.
  
• Of the respondents, 34 percent knew one or more people who had experienced a significant health problem due to the COVID-19 illness, and 22 percent knew one or more people who had been injured by the shot.
  
• Fifty-one percent of the survey respondents had been jabbed. Of those, 13 percent reported experiencing a “serious” health problem post-jab. Compare that to Pfizer’s six-month safety analysis, which claimed only 1.2 percent of trial participants experienced a serious adverse event.
  
• In December 2022, Rasmussen Reports polled 1,000 Americans. In this poll, 34 percent reported experiencing minor side effects from the jab and seven percent reported major side effects.
  

While it’s clear that the experimental COVID shots have killed a considerable number of people, the total death toll remains elusive, thanks to U.S. health agencies obfuscating, hiding, and manipulating data.
That said, the most recent survey1,2—published in the peer-reviewed journal BMC Infectious Diseases—puts the death toll from the COVID jabs somewhere between 217,330 and 332,608 in 2021 alone. As noted by Steve Kirsch:3

Quote:“[We’ve] killed at least 217,000 Americans and seriously injured 33 million … in just the first year, and the CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] and FDA [U.S. Food and Drug Administration] want to give you more shots … Since deaths from the vaccine were higher in 2022, most experts would estimate the all-cause mortality death toll from the COVID vaccines to be in the range of 500K to 600K.

Quote:“So the global cost of life from these vaccines is on the order of 10 to 12 million people … These [data] are consistent with the numbers I’ve been saying for a long time. It’s not a coincidence.”

Survey: Why People Did or Did Not Get the Jab
Now, the slant of this paper is kind of interesting. The primary aim of it was to “identify the factors associated by American citizens with the decision to be vaccinated against COVID-19.”
The author was curious about why 31 percent of the U.S. population had declined the jab or not completed the primary series by November 2022, nearly two years into a massively advertised “vaccination” campaign.
Calculating the proportion of fatal events from the jab was secondary. As explained by the author, Mark Skidmore,4 Ph.D., an economics professor at Michigan State University:5

Quote:“A largely unexplored factor is the degree to which serious health problems arising from the COVID-19 illness or the COVID-19 vaccines among family and friends influences the decision to be vaccinated.

Quote:“Serious illness due to COVID-19 would make vaccination more likely; the perceived benefits of avoiding COVID-19 through inoculation would be higher.

Quote:“On the other hand, observing major health issues following COVID-19 inoculation within one’s social network would heighten the perceived risks of vaccination. Previous studies have not evaluated the degree to which experiences with the disease and vaccine injury influence vaccine status.

Quote:“The main aim of this online survey of COVID-19 health experiences is to investigate the degree to which the COVID-19 disease and COVID-19 vaccine adverse events among friends and family, whether perceived or real, influenced inoculation decisions. The second aim of this work is to estimate the total number of COVID-19 vaccine-induced fatalities nationwide from the survey.”

Here’s an excerpt describing the methodology:6

Quote:“An online survey of COVID-19 health experiences was conducted. Information was collected regarding reasons for and against COVID-19 inoculations, experiences with COVID-19 illness, and COVID-19 inoculations by survey respondents and their social circles. Logit regression analyses were carried out to identify factors influencing the likelihood of being vaccinated.”

Survey Findings
A total of 2,840 people completed the survey between Dec. 18 and Dec. 23, 2021. The mean age was 47, and the gender ratio was 51 percent women, 49 percent men. Just over half, 51 percent, had received one or more COVID jabs.
As Skidmore suspected, results showed that people who got the jab were more likely to know someone who experienced a health problem from COVID-19 infection, whereas those who knew someone who experienced a health problem after getting the jab were less likely to be jabbed.
Of the respondents, 34 percent knew one or more people who had experienced a significant health problem due to the COVID-19 illness, and 22 percent knew one or more people who had been injured by the shot. So, as noted by to the author:7

Quote:“Knowing someone who reported serious health issues either from COVID-19 or from COVID-19 vaccination are important factors for the decision to get vaccinated.”

As for the types of side effects experienced by people within the respondents’ social circles, they included (but were not limited to) the “usual suspects,” such as:

• Heart and cardiovascular problems.
  
• Severe COVID infection or other respiratory illness.
  
• Feeling generally unwell, weak, fatigued, and out of breath for weeks.
  
• Blood clots and stroke.
  
• Death.
  

Hundreds of Thousands Killed for No Reason
Based on these survey data, Skidmore estimates:

Quote:“… the total number of fatalities due to COVID-19 inoculation may be as high as 278,000 (95 percent CI 217,330-332,608) when fatalities that may have occurred regardless of inoculation are removed.”

Were COVID-19 an infection with an extremely high mortality rate, perhaps high rates of death from a vaccine would be acceptable. But COVID-19 has an exceptionally low mortality rate, on par with or lower than influenza, hence the risk associated with the COVID jabs ought to be equally low.
The global cost of life from these vaccines is on the order of 10 to 12 million people.
— Steve Kirsch

As it stands, the risks of the shots are very high, while Pfizer’s own trial data, with more than 40,000 participants, show they offer no benefit in terms of your risk of hospitalization and/or death. The absolute risk reduction is so minute as to be inconsequential.8
High Rates of Side Effects
The death toll from the jabs isn’t the only disturbing part of this paper, though. Skidmore’s findings also suggest side effects from the jab may be more common than previously suspected.
As mentioned, 51 percent of the respondents had been jabbed. Of those, 15 percent reported experiencing a new health problem post-jab and 13 percent deemed it “serious.” Compare that to Pfizer’s six-month safety analysis,9 which claimed only 1.2 percent of trial participants reported a serious adverse event.
Now, as suggested by Kirsch,10 “we need to discount that by a factor of two because people report less severe adverse events as adverse events.” Still, that means serious adverse events from the jab are five times higher than what Pfizer reported.

Quote:“This is why the FDA never does after-market surveys on the drugs it approves. Because reality hurts,” Kirsch writes.11 “It is the FDA that should have discovered this before Mark Skidmore. The FDA is asleep at the wheel and they just believe everything the drug companies tell them, hook, line, and sinker. This is a major miss. Why aren’t they doing surveys like this to see if the reality matches the study?”

More Side Effect Rate Comparisons
For additional comparison, here are the findings of several other investigations:

• Rasmussen Reports12: In December 2022, Rasmussen Reports polled 1,000 Americans. In this poll—taken one year after Skidmore’s survey—34 percent reported experiencing minor side effects from the jab and seven percent reported major side effects.
  
• CDC’s V-Safe data13: In October 2022, ICAN [Informed Consent Action Network] obtained the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s V-Safe data. This is a voluntary program to monitor adverse vaccine reactions. Of the 10.1 million COVID jab recipients who used the app, 7.7 percent had to seek medical care post-jab.
  
• Kirsch-funded survey14: A June 2022 U.S. survey by the market research company Pollfish found that 16.3 percent of COVID jabbed respondents experienced an injury, and 9.7 percent required medical care.
  

The graphic below, which visually compares Skidmore’s findings to the findings of the Rasmussen, V-Safe, and Pollfish surveys, was created by InfoGame on Substack.15 As noted by InfoGame:

Quote:“Skidmore’s article serves as another sign that the rate of COVID-19 side effects is extremely high and that the COVID-19 vaccines are an unprecedently risky medical product.”

(InfoGame)
Menstrual Irregularities Are Common Post-Jab
While we’re on the topic of reported side effects, several surveys have also focused on the frequency of abnormal menses in women who got the jab, which could be indicative of reproductive harm. For example:

• A British survey published in early December 2021 found 20 percent of women experienced menstrual disturbances following their jab.16
  
• A study published in Science Advances in mid-July 2022 found 66 percent of “fully vaccinated” postmenopausal women experienced abnormal breakthrough bleeding. In total, 42.1 percent reported heavier menstrual flow post-jab (this included women of all ages, as well as transgenders on hormone treatments).17
  
• An Italian peer-reviewed study published in March 2022 found that “50-60 percent of reproductive-age women who received the first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine reported menstrual cycle irregularities, regardless of the type of administered vaccine.” After the second dose, abnormal menses were reported by 60 percent to 70 percent.18
  

People in High Places Seek Retraction
Not surprisingly, people in high places are already trying to force a retraction of the paper. A special notice from the editor, dated just two days post-publication, states:
“Readers are alerted that the conclusions of this paper are subject to criticisms that are being considered by editors. Specifically, that the claims are unsubstantiated and that there are questions about the quality of the peer review.”
As noted by Kirsch:19

Quote:“They are actively trying to get the paper retracted because it destroys the narrative. I’m certain they will succeed because journals are under intense pressure to censor any anti-narrative paper. The problem is that Mark’s survey was entirely consistent with my surveys.

Quote:“If they want to have the paper retracted they need to show us THEIR surveys. But of course, they don’t have any surveys because they are too afraid of the results.

Quote:“So they will use hand-waving arguments like “I don’t like the methodology” or some nonsense like that instead of gathering their own data. They will NEVER show us survey data that supports their narrative because it isn’t there.

Quote:“That’s why there are no success anecdotes. NOBODY can give me the name of a U.S. geriatric practice where all-cause deaths plummeted after the vaccines rolled out. In every case, they went the wrong way. The narrative is unraveling at an accelerated pace but the medical community is still fighting the truth.”

Originally published Feb. 07, 2023, on Mercola.com

Better than most from that time period

Which Cabinet member will be the designated survivor tonight, watching the State of the Union address at an undisclosed location outside of Washington, DC, in the company of the Secret Service, a White House doctor, and a military aide carrying the backup Presidential Emergency Satchel (Football)?

Last year it was Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo. A few guesses are Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona, Secretary of Veterans Affairs Denis McDonough, and Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack. Secretary of Energy Jennifer Granholm is disqualified; she was born in Canada.




In 2016, former Member of Congress and Secretary of Agriculture Dan Glickman, and former Secretary of the Interior Gale Norton described what it was like to be the designated survivors during the State of the Union address in 1997 and 2002, respectively:



Fun Fact: Tom Vilsack was the designated survivor in 2012, when he also served as secretary of agriculture during the Obama administration.

According to the National Constitution Center, the tradition of a designated survivor during the State of the Union speech began in the 1950s as a result of fears of a nuclear attack during the Cold War. But the federal government did not publicly name the designated survivor until 1981, when President Ronald Reagan’s Education Secretary Terrel Bell assumed the designation for an address to a joint session of Congress.

The presidential line of succession is outlined in the Presidential Succession Act of 1792, which was updated during the Truman administration in the Presidential Succession Act of 1947. The updated line of succession was spurred by President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s death in 1945, which led to Harry Truman’s assumption to the Oval Office.

Current order of succession

The secretaries of Interior and Agriculture tie for the most frequent designated survivor appointments, with seven designations each.

Feb 5, 2019: Secretary of Energy Rick Perry was the Designated Survivor.
Feb 4, 2020: Secretary of the Interior David Bernhardt was the Designated Survivor.

We still don’t know whom, if anyone, the Trump White House assigned as the "Designated Survivor" for Joe Biden’s inauguration on January 20, 2021.