Well Clyde, looks like they really did violate The First Amendment.

The courts are saying so (so far), until The NWO Democrats get the payoffs right.

All that Social Media Censoring "Requests" were illegal, but gee willikers, who and what enforces the "penalties" ??

Any bets TOS is neck deep in the "redacted" parts ?? ROFLULz 


ziLINK--> Appeals Court Finds Biden Admin Violated First Amendment By Encouraging Censorship 

Quote:A federal appeals court partially affirmed a lower court’s finding on Friday that Biden administration officials violated the First Amendment by coercing social media companies to censor speech.


The Fifth Circuit affirmed a lower court’s judgement that the White House, Surgeon General, CDC and FBI violated the First Amendment while finding that “the district court erred in finding that the NIAID Officials, CISA Officials, and State Department Officials likely violated Plaintiffs’ First Amendment rights.” Yet it found the injunction, issued by District of Louisiana Judge Terry A. Doughty in July, was “vague and broader than necessary.”

“Ultimately, we find the district court did not err in determining that several officials—namely the White House, the Surgeon General, the CDC, and the FBI—likely coerced or significantly encouraged social-media, platforms to moderate content, rendering those decisions state actions,” the court wrote. “In doing so, the officials likely violated the First Amendment.”

Historically the Earth has been several degrees warmer with no ice caps at the poles and colder (IE snow ball Earth)... it is called planetary climate cycles. Welcome to the solar system and living on a planet called Earth.

Recently, a scientist came out and admitted he manipulated climate data in order to have his paper published
and his prestige maintained. Of course, such a revelation needs to be attacked by the MSM and was quickly
jumped upon. But still, it does seem like Morpheus was correct when he stated: "you've been living in a dream
world, Neo"


Climate Wire announced yesterday (09/07/2023):

Quote:'A climate scientist ignited controversy Tuesday when he claimed that he withheld key details of his wildfire
research to fit “preapproved narratives” on climate risks in order to be published in one of the world’s most
esteemed science publications.


Patrick Brown, he said what should never be said.

The researcher, Patrick Brown, said he omitted “the full truth” about nonclimate causes of wildfire, such as
insufficient forest management, from a peer-reviewed study that showed how rising temperatures are increasing
the risk of wildfire, because he suspected editors of the journal Nature would have rejected his research if it failed
to exclusively blame human-caused greenhouse gases for intensifying blazes. Nature said his claims were untrue.

“I knew not to try to quantify key aspects other than climate change in my research because it would dilute the story
that prestigious journals like Nature and its rival, Science, want to tell,” Brown wrote in an opinion piece published
by the Free Press. Brown was hailed as a whistleblower by some conservative media outlets that sometimes promote
falsehoods around climate change.

His accusations were covered by FoxNews.com and the New York Post with headlines that indicated Brown’s claims
were evidence of corruption in climate science. But the editor-in-chief of Nature, Magdalena Skipper, said Brown’s
assertions were demonstrably false.

Before the paper was published, peer reviewers of Brown’s research pointed out that he excluded important variables
other than climate change that also affect wildfires, Skipper said. Brown argued against including those other variables,
she said.

“The only thing in Patrick Brown’s statements about the editorial processes in scholarly journals that we agree on is that
science should not work through the efforts by which he published this article,” Skipper said in a statement to E&E News.
“We are now carefully considering the implications of his stated actions; certainly, they reflect poor research practices
and are not in line with the standards we set for our journal.”

Skipper cited three pieces published in Nature in the last month that she said disprove Brown’s claims, because they
questioned or downplayed the role of climate change in ecological disasters. They include research on marine heat
waves, increased carbon emissions in the Amazon and the role of human activity in driving wildfires.

Brown, who did not respond to a request for comment, has a doctoral degree in earth and climate science from Duke
University. He is the co-director of the climate and energy team at the Breakthrough Institute, which has sometimes
been critical of climate claims in the media as well as climate policy. His Nature research was published last week.

“To put it bluntly, climate science has become less about understanding the complexities of the world and more about
serving as a kind of Cassandra, urgently warning the public about the dangers of climate change,” Brown wrote in the
Op-Ed. “However understandable this instinct may be, it distorts a great deal of climate science research, misinforms
the public, and most importantly, makes practical solutions more difficult to achieve.”

Brown’s claims were amplified by conservative media outlets.
The New York Post republished his op-ed with the headline “As a scientist, I’m not allowed to tell the full truth about
climate change.”

Fox News also reran the piece with the headline “Climate scientist admits editing paper to fit ‘preapproved narratives.’”
The right-wing Daily Mail wrote, “Top scientist Patrick Brown says he deliberately OMITTED key fact in climate change
piece he’s just had published in prestigious journal to ensure woke editors ran it.”

Marissa Streit, the CEO of PragerU, a far-right advocacy group that aims to bring climate denial videos into schools,
wrote on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, that Brown was “another example” of a scientist who’s brave enough
to speak out against their colleagues. “We’ve been attacked for giving a voice to scientists that have been bullied and
marginalized for not towing the elites’ climate change catastrophe narrative,” she wrote. “We will continue to give them
a voice.”

That firestorm of attention and distorted claims threaten to blow back on Brown’s seven co-authors, scientists said.
It’s not clear if any of his co-authors knew about Brown’s plans. They include recent graduates and early-career scientists.
None of them responded to requests for comment Wednesday. Brown’s actions are “monumentally unethical,” said Gavin
Schmidt, director of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies.

Over decades of research in the field, he said he could not remember another author treating publication as a “game.”
Brown’s actions won’t hurt his own job prospects since he is no longer an academic, but the controversy could follow
his colleagues throughout their careers, Schmidt said.

He added that Brown censored himself, rather than actually being told his paper wouldn’t be published if he broadened
his research. “He’s whistleblowing on himself — he did all of this,” Schmidt said. “Nobody did anything to him.”...'

Attached Files

Thumbnail(s)
   

I had relatives in the Pacific War so with skin in the game I have always studied this war in great detail.

I finally found the best reference ever with detailed info you cannot find anywhere else on how this war was to be prosecuted with inside info from both sides straight from the horses mouth.

A fascinating read for Pacific War buffs -

https://history.army.mil/books/wwii/MacA...1/ch01.htm

VP Kamala was asked an obviously staged question while oddly enough, in Jakarta, Indonesia at an event that J.Biden "decided" to skip !!

Strange coincidences happening with J.Biden.

Jill gets COVID again !!

H.Biden ready to get indicted for that gun charge.

J.Biden skips out suddenly after giving a Vet The CMOH leaving the guy just standing there !!

Now Kamala gives the fake "surprise" look after that question.

I say J.Biden quits soon !!!

Democrats need a "stable (no horse pun intended)" Candidate to run in the Primaries and in the 2024 Election. 

J.Biden too shaky.

She's getting "GR-O_oooo-MED" for takeover any time now !!!!

I can't wait for the word salad speech she will be giving at her "swearing in" (not swearing at).



Kamala Harris: Every VP Understands They ‘May Have to Take Over’ Role of President If Necessary

Quote:Vice President Kamala Harris said she would be ready to take over the role of president if necessary.


“Joe Biden is going to be fine, so that is not going to come to fruition,” Harris told the Associated Press in Jakarta, Indonesia, replying to an interviwer’s question. “But let us also understand that every vice president — every vice president — understands that when they take the oath they must be very clear about the responsibility they may have to take over the job of being president.”

“I’m no different,” she added.

Harris claimed that Biden, 82, is “smart” and able to understand “complex” issues. He is able to deliver, she added, noting the administration’s record.

“I see him every day,” Harris said about Biden. “A substantial amount of time we spend together is in the Oval Office, where I see how his ability to understand issues and weave through complex issues in a way that no one else can to make smart and important decisions on behalf of the American people have played out.”

“And so I will say to you that I think the American people ultimately want to know that their president delivers. And Joe Biden delivers,” she said.

Another prominent Russian propagandist makes yet another threat to start a nuclear war with the United States over Ukraine and the world barely notices and shrugs (because it’s absurd).

40 years ago, Russia and nuclear threats were taken much more seriously.

Quote:A Kremlin propagandist has issued the latest nuclear threat against the West regarding the war in Ukraine, warning that the U.S. could be in danger of a Russian missile attack.

Igor Korotchenko, editor of the newspaper National Defense and a regular guest on the Russia 1 channel where guests have repeatedly called for strikes against Ukraine's allies, took exception to criticism of Russian conduct in the war.

"Russia is being warned and threatened that if we misbehave, or if in [NATO senior member for logistics] Ben Hodges' opinion, we exceed what he considers to be the necessary permissible lines for the use of all types of Russian weapons, he threatens us with more than just strikes on the Crimean bridge," Korotchenko said.

Hodges has repeatedly called for Ukraine to be provided with all the weapons it needs to retake Crimea, such as ATACMS, (Army Tactical Missile Systems), which would allow long-range precision strikes on the peninsula Moscow annexed in 2014.

Korotchenko said that Hodges believed the U.S. might consider strikes on the bases of Russia's Black Sea Fleet and troops in Crimea, as well as strike Russian naval bases in Tartus, Syria.

Korotchenko believed these were "not just statements of a retired hawk" but also a concerted information campaign "designed to influence both us and a Western audience."

While the U.S. is the biggest provider of military aid to Ukraine, it has taken pains to avoid direct confrontation with Russia and has made no threats of attacking the targets that Korotchenko referred to.

But Korotchenko said there should be a discussion about what will determine "the use and permissibility of tactical nuclear weapons what goals and what tactics we will use."



"The most important message we should send to the Americans is that we will not wage war with you in Europe," he said in a clip subsequently posted on X (formerly Twitter) by Ukrainian internal affairs adviser Anton Gerashchenko.

"In response to your attacks on Russian military or civilian facilities, the first strike will be a preventative limited strike against targets on the territory of the United States of America, " he told the anchor of 60 Minutes, Yevgeny Popov. Last week, Russia announced that its Sarmat strategic missile system, which can reach the U.S., had been put on combat duty.

"Attention, United States!," wrote Geraschchenko next to the video. "Russian propagandists threaten with nuclear strikes on U.S. territory."

In response to Korotchenko's comments, Hodges told Newsweek that the U.S. administration was "finally realizing that the likelihood of Russia using a nuclear weapon is extremely small."

"Russia has been threatening nuclear strikes since the beginning. I take them seriously because Russia has thousands of nuclear weapons and because they clearly don't care how many innocent people may die," he said.

"But I think they realize that their nukes are actually most effective when they don't use them. They see how we self-deter."

"Crimea is the decisive terrain of this war," said Hodges of the peninsula, which has seen a stepping up of attacks believed to be carried out by Kyiv—including the Kerch Bridge that links the occupied territory with the Russian mainland.

"Once Ukraine liberates Crimea, it is over. Ukraine knows they cannot ever be safe or secure or rebuild their economy as long as Russia occupies Crimea," Hodges added.

Russian State TV Threatens Nuclear Strike on US

They are in a patent war. Look at who is on the battlefield as our heroes. David E. Martin - Patent/IP analyst. Bret and Eric weinstein (sons of Les Weinstein). And Ramaswamy, son of a patent attorney. I'm sure there are many more. Robert Malone wants to be known by his patents.


Wiki



Genevant Sciences


Vivek Ramaswamy is a board member of Arbutus Biopharma, the Founder of Roivant Sciences and a Co-Founder and the Founder of Strive Asset Management. Vivek was the Founder of Genevant. He attended Yale Law School and Harvard University. He was also CEO at Sio Gene Therapies.

So, this is coming from someone who's company is suing Moderna, (who is suing Pfizer) for patent infringement, he could get $billions and you don't do mega $deals without powerful handlers.

Like many others in the Bio-tech world, I believe they are over selling confidence in what they can and cannot do. They need people to be confident in the capabilities of 2020s medicine, so that continued research (including gain-of-function) and genetic data mining can continue.

Apparently, this is what they have planned for all of us. Vaccines for everything. Heart disease, cancer, diabetes, every illness you can think of. Plotkin says we're going to receive many more vaccines than we already do. Imagine thinking any of us will comply after what these lunatics did during COVID. Ha, nvm, many will. I'll retreat to the woods and live off deer and squirrels before I let anyone inject me.

Afraid of needles? No problem. They got a solution:

Needle-free vaccine patches deliver jabs through the skin in seconds - "Australian company Vaxxas successfully manufactured needle-free painless vaccines after a decade of research."


This is the perfect business model that they've spent decades planning. First poison the environment and feed people toxic awful food that gives them cancer/heart disease/diabetes, and then sell them the solution that isn't actually a solution, but a means to finish you off while milking you and the governments you pay taxes to for every dime they have. Regardless if the intentional environmental/food poisoning is true or not does not matter. Stuff (chemicals) that has been known to cause cancer along with endocrine disruptors has been known for decades, yet why in past couple years are we carpet bombed with ads, infomercials, talking heads on such dangerous toxins spreading fear & anxiety and oh btw don't breathe the air either. But, don't worry about it we have many solutions (vaxxes) for that, currently undergoing many human trials as we speak.

Clip from vaccinologist & immunologist Stanley Plotkin (born May 12, 1932) deposition Under Oath:



Q: Have you ever used babies of mothers in prison to study an experimental vaccine?

Plotkin: Yes

Q: Have you ever used individuals under colonial rule to study an experimental vaccine?

Plotkin: Yes

Q: Did you do so in the Belgian Congo?

Plotkin: Yes

Q: Did that experiment involve over a million people?

Plotkin: Well....well alright y-yes.

The full version (9 hrs):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFTsd042M3o

Did you know Stanley Plotkin and another vaccinologist named Hilary Koprowski worked with the Belgian colonial authorities in the Congo to get a million African child "volunteers" to do multiple trials for vaccines?

These trials were deemed too risky in the US, so what was their solution? Head to Africa and experiment on poor black children with parents that didn't know how they were risking their children's health. Some died of course in the interest of progress, but it wasn't attributed to the vaccines, per usual.

Guessing this is why Bill Gates is so heavily involved in Africa on numerous fronts. Not only vaccines, but GMO food like rice, modified mosquitos, and even secret anti-fertility agent in vaccines to test ways to reduce global birthing rates. It's his playground for obscene medical experiments that they intend on possibly bringing to the US and other first world countries.

Where is Stanley Plotkin now?

Still working as an advisor to places like Moderna, Pfizer, and every other vaccine company.

He was heavily involved in consulting for the mRNA vaccines, and has been saying in recent interviews that we'll have vaccines for everything soon. Heart disease, cancer, diabetes, etc, and that children will get even more shots than they do now.

HCG Found in WHO Tetanus Vaccine in Kenya Raises Concern in the Developing World

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation: Our story


Pediatrician and vaccinologist, Dr. Stanley Plotkin, shares his thoughts on the future of vaccines. 3.5 min clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ex6i9cHH8E  (restricted to Youtube site)

"And then the way of administering vaccines, certainly one of the fields that I think is extremely promising, is the use of the skin to vaccinate, that is, applying vaccines to the skin without injecting them.

There are now several different ways in which vaccination can be done by application of a vaccine to the skin so that we don't have to use needles and syringes, which, aside from frightening some people, pose problems of reuse of vaccines, etc.

So, I think technology is going to improve vaccination.

I think there will be many more targets.

I think adolescents and adults are going to receive more vaccines than they ever have before, and that should have a generally beneficial effect on health throughout life, not simply in the pediatric age group."

Now this looks promising. It appears these things are about 15 Times better than Lithium Ion Batteries, Safer, and built with common materials that we don't have to go beg China for. I don't see "automobiles" on their website but they do have "Residential" listed as coming soon. I would love to see "Safer" battery tech and hopefully cheaper as well. 



[b][b]EnerVenue Opening Gigafactory in Shelby County, Kentucky to Scale Production of its Differentiated Energy Storage Solutions[/b][/b]



https://enervenue.com/enervenue-opening-...solutions/

Quote:FREMONT, Calif., and SHELBY COUNTY, Ky., March 28, 2023 – EnerVenue, the first company to bring metal-hydrogen batteries capable of more than 30,000 cycles to the clean energy revolution, today announced it will open a one-million-square-foot gigafactory in Shelby County, Kentucky. The 73-acre site will become the company’s state-of-the-art manufacturing plant for its Energy Storage Vessels. All aspects of design and process validation, manufacturing and testing will be performed onsite. The first phase of the project will encompass one gigawatt hour of annual production. EnerVenue expects to invest in excess of $1 billion to expand to more than 20 gigawatt hours per year across its domestic manufacturing sites in subsequent phases.



“Locating EnerVenue’s gigafactory in Kentucky is a win for the commonwealth,” said Governor Andy Beshear. “Our leadership has prioritized bringing high-quality jobs to the region and this is yet another example of those efforts paying dividends.”
The new gigafactory, located in the heart of Kentucky’s manufacturing region, is expected to create 450 full-time jobs during the initial opening and first phase of the production ramp. Shelby County offered EnerVenue a generous long-term incentive package comprising property and wage tax rebates totaling $20 million over a 25-year period, which is commensurate with the company’s significant local investment. The state of Kentucky also offered EnerVenue more than $10.3 million in tax incentives for the first phase of the company’s ramp. The tax rebates will help support growth in the county and incentivize future development as the gigafactory expands and adds additional jobs.


“We are excited to welcome EnerVenue to Shelby County and look forward to the positive impact its gigafactory will have on our local economy,” said Dan Ison, Shelby County Judge Executive. “With this facility, county residents will be afforded new, lucrative career opportunities.”


EnerVenue continues to see accelerating demand for its unique solution for safe, durable, and versatile clean energy storage. The company has more than 7 GWh of customer commitments, including from Pine Gate Renewables, Nicon Industries’ Green Energy Renewable Solutions, and Sonnell Power Solutions, among others.


“As customer interest in EnerVenue’s storage technology soars, we’re excited to significantly scale battery production with our new state-of-the-art gigafactory in Shelby County,” said Jorg Heinemann, CEO, EnerVenue. “Following a nationwide vetting process, Kentucky emerged as the ideal fit to build our new facility. The state and county governments were committed to bringing manufacturing and clean energy jobs to the region, and we look forward to working with them as we build out operations.”


The gigafactory also continues to grow EnerVenue’s national footprint. The company recently expanded its operations in Fremont, California and secured long-term materials and equipment supply agreements with Precision Process and Precious Plate in Niagara Falls, New York.


EnerVenue recently launched the second generation of its large-format battery technology—Energy Storage Vessels™—that enable more scalable and customizable configurations. The company also backs its vessels with Capacity Assurance™, offering customers a straightforward 20-year/20,000-cycle warranty extension at 88%+ capacity.
The gigafactory is expected to begin production by the end of the year.

Quote:Durable

Lifetime of 30,000 cycles (3 per day without rest for 30 years)

Safe


Batteries with no thermal runaway risk, no risk of fire propagation and no fire suppression needed.

[b][b]Versatile[/b][/b]

Superior operation in any climate with almost no maintenance required.
[b][b]
Superior[/b][/b]

An alternative that outperforms de-facto standard lithium-ion chemistries.

Transferring over another one before it gets wiped. The basic premise of the data shows a form of ADE with too many vaccinations. Acquiring the virus becomes easier and easier.

IgG4 Antibodies After Repeated SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccination


A year ago, we had a post that I cannot find about EU regulators warning of overuse of covid boosters damaging the immune system and causing a form of ADE with coronaviruses. It appears we may have that problem and more.

A recent study concludes mRNA doses raise IgG4 and they do not know why. Luckily this does not seem to be the case with viral-vector vaccines and is a problem with the mRNA delivery system.

I myself refused the mRNA, mainly because all mRNA vaccine trials for SARS 1 & MERS were failures, usually resulting in ADE or other major problems. Let's put it this way, they went through a lot of rodents.

IgG4-related disease: why is it so important?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6102618/

Quote:IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a newly classified, immunological condition. It involves potentially multi-organ inflammation and fibrosis, characterized (in most cases) by elevated serum IgG4 levels and presenting as tissue edema with fibrosis and marked inflammatory infiltration of IgG4-positive plasma cells. IgG4-RD constitutes a number of conditions previously classified separately according to the organ affected, therefore, it occurs in various forms: autoimmune pancreatitis type 1 (AIP1), Mikulicz’s disease (MD), dacryoadenitis, sclerosing cholangitis, lymphadenopathy, and – less commonly – retroperitoneal fibrosis, Riedel’s thyroiditis, sclerosing sialadenitis (Kuttner’s tumor), and interstitial lung or kidney disease.

Quote:By now, you have probably heard about the Science Immunology paper showing that people who have received mRNA Covid vaccines produce more of an unusual antibody called IgG4 over time. A number of mRNA skeptics, including me, wrote about it last week.


But the reasons why the paper is so troubling may still not be clear. So here’s a (with luck) digestible explanation, starting with what is probably the most important question: what’s the worst-case scenario?

1: What’s the worst-case scenario?

Glad you asked.

The worst-case scenario: the mRNA shots lead to a doom loop, robbing vaccinated people of a crucial immune system tool against the coronavirus in a way that worsens with each new infection.

Thus, over time, the average severity of Covid infections will increase. People will take longer to get better once they’re infected. Hospitalizations and deaths will rise. The health-care system will come under worsening strain.

Oh, and some people may suffer nasty autoimmune side effects too, including pancreatitis, kidney disease, and even aneurysms.

Quote:Shortly after the initial two mRNA vaccine doses, the IgG response mainly consists of the pro-inflammatory subclasses IgG1 and IgG3.


Here, we report that several months after the second vaccination, SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies were increasingly composed of non-inflammatory IgG4, which were further boosted by a third mRNA vaccination and/or SARS-CoV-2 variant breakthrough infections. IgG4 antibodies among all spike-specific IgG antibodies rose on average from 0.04% shortly after the second vaccination to 19.27% late after the third vaccination.

This induction of IgG4 antibodies was not observed after homologous or heterologous SARS-CoV-2 vaccination with adenoviral vectors.


We found an mRNA vaccine-driven expansion of memory B cells expressing IgG4. We detected spike-specific IgG4 antibodies in about half of the serum samples collected five to seven months after the second immunization, all of which did not show any IgG4 at earlier time points. For all other IgG subclasses, a decline was seen in the same period. Moreover, after the third immunization, IgG4 levels sharply increased and became detectable in almost all vaccinees.

In summary, our study demonstrates an mRNA vaccine-induced antiviral IgG4 antibody response appearing late after secondary immunization. Further investigations are needed to clarify the precise immunological mechanisms driving this response and to evaluate whether an IgG4-driven antibody response affects subsequent viral infections and booster vaccinations. This is not only relevant for potential future vaccine campaigns against SARS-CoV-2, but also for new mRNA-based vaccine developments against other pathogens.

Quote:In summary, we characterized the comprehensive effects of extended immunization with RBD booster vaccines in a balb/c mouse model. Our findings revealed that repeated dosing after the establishment of vaccine response might not further improve the antigen-specific reactivity; instead, it could cause systematic tolerance and inability to generate effective humoral and cellular immune responses to current SARS-CoV-2 variants. Our study provides timely information for the prevention of COVID-19. It puts an extended immunization course with two or more RBD-based vaccine boosters at debate, and warns for the future applications of vaccine enhancers without proper evaluation of serum antibody titers and T cell functions.

Quote:An item of note is the above sentence, “It is possible that the mRNA may be integrated or re-transcribed in some cells”. The so-called reverse transcription, that is, vaccine mRNA becoming part of the human DNA genome in some affected cells, was originally dismissed without evidence by the so-called ‘Covid science’, until it was demonstrated in in-vitro experiment

To be sure that their finding is not spurious, they included a control group of people who never received the Covid vaccines.

Quote:

The study group, from southern Italy, was 40 subjects, 20 were vaccinated with the full cycle of mRNA vaccine as of April 2022, being part of the health sector, and 20 were unvaccinated with negativity for COVID-19 to nasopharyngeal test and with no titre of any antibodies. Other 20 unvaccinated persons were added that were positive for COVID-19.

The three groups were looked at.

It turns out that [i]only the people in the vaccinated subgroup were found to carry vaccine-derived spike protein[/i]. What is worse, vaccine spike protein was found as late as six months after the last dose.

Quote:

The specific PP-Spike fragment was found in 50% of the biological sample analysed. This presence was independent of the SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody titre. The antibody titres had a geometric mean of 629.86BAU/mL. The minimum time PP-Spike was detected was 69 days after vaccination, while the maximum time was 187 days. All controls (samples from unvaccinated individuals) were negative. The control group (20 unvaccinated people) was also tested after contracting COVID-19 and was negative for PP-spike.

Nowhere does the study state that spike protein production ends after 187 days – the upper limit on time after vaccination was an artefact of the study design.

I am going out on a limb here. I can't prove anything I am going to post. But I can't help but wonder why they made the immediate jump to, " the child was born sick", without asking the question, "Why are so many children sick"?

Especially coming from a scientific society that believes so strongly in evolution, why would they not see such obvious changes in behavior in so many children, and not make the same jump in thought that I did. Could there be changes in our atmosphere, water, or food supply that may be the reason for these behavioral changes?

Anyway, watching this video got the gears turning in my brain in 50 directions at once.

The last thing these children needed were more chemicals being thrown at them, as they experimented to find out what would stick. 

I have seen and heard of families that have had good luck with strict dietary control of their children and making sure they avoided GMO foods, and only feed them fresh organically grown and harvested foods.

Maybe more emphasis should be on what not to give children instead of what medications to feed them.

"The Medicated Child"