For those who have heard about the genetic bottle neck humans experienced long ago where as a species we almost went extinct here is some more studies about the subject. Ice age and a very low number of breeding pairs world wide.

Quote:Today there are over 8 billion humans living on our planet. However, if we had looked at the world between 800,000 and 900,000 years ago, the picture would have been shockingly different. New scientific findings shed new light on our ancestors, and point to an important human speciation event. Indeed, Scientists are only now shedding light on a previously unknown period in human evolutionary history. According to a new study, early humans known as 'Homo erectus' nearly went extinct less than 1 million years ago, likely due to extreme ice age conditions. According to genetic evidence, between 813,000 and 930,000 years ago, modern humans' ancestors experienced a severe bottleneck losing approximately 98.7% of their breeding population. Remarkably, our forefathers faced extinction due to a severe population bottleneck that lasted for a heck of a bloody long time. In fact, our ancestors' estimated population size was so small, they would almost certainly have gone extinct if not for shear determination and dumb luck. A study, titled 'Genomic inference of a severe human bottleneck during the Early to Middle Pleistocene transition', demonstrates this fact. The evidence shows that The human population remaining very small, but stable for more than 100,000 years, also fueled the divergence of modern humans, Neanderthals and the so-called Denisovans.

Remember this story from Chilean UNICEF 8 years ago depicting "Marciano" the "ET boy"...?

Quote:UNICEF Video urging children to accept Extraterrestrials

A video released in Chile by UNICEF (United Nations Children Fund) shows an alien child being integrated into a classroom with human children.

At first the alien child was mocked, but after showing his advanced psychic skills he was accepted by the human children.

You have to know that UNICEF has an agreement with an organization of the Vatican called Scholas Occurrentes” initiative.

This organization founded by Pope Francis is sponsoring UNICEF in an attempt to change the way children are educated.

This UNICEF alien video is not only evidence that there is a direct link between UNICEF and the Vatican but it suggests that behind the scenes the Vatican is part of the United Nations secretly initiative to prepare the human race to accept alien visitors with the ultimate goal to integrate these alien visitors into the human society, reports exopolitics.org.

The text in the description box below the video released on the Facebook page of UNICEF Chile is clear: “Knowing someone else is a great opportunity to live valuable experiences. Say yes to integration!”

If true this is some sick stuff. There have been others who have said this stuff was going on but seldom is there any repercussions . How far can a society go before it implodes ? Actually when the Vietnam refugees were sent to sponsor homes some of the stories way back when were worse than sad as the sponsors abused and treated them like slaves in more than one instance.

Quote:The united states is the largest trafficker of children in the world. Children that are illegally kidnapped and brought across the US Mexico border are then sold off to wealthy Americans… used as sex slaves and worse… if you can imagine anything worse… it’s happening and the corporate media is too scared to touch the story. A Whistleblower who worked at one of these facilities has come forward to expose all of this… Carlos Arellano Former US immigration contractor and he joins us now.

The strength of the quake has been reported to be around a Magnitude 7 and as expected the damage is severe. Hopefully rescue teams can get the survivors out of the ruble before it is to late.

Quote:A powerful earthquake has killed at least 632 people in Morocco. There’s significant damage being reported, and the number of casualties is expected to rise. The U-S geological survey says the magnitude SEVEN quake struck some 70 kilometers south of Marrakesh.

Quote:More than 800 people were killed and hundreds more injured after a powerful 6.8 earthquake rocked the African nation of Morocco Friday night, destroying buildings and leaving scenes of chaos.

Another JFK whodunit book recently released, for free.


Motive, Means, and Opportunity: JFK Assassination Mystery Solved!

University of Macau | Google Scholar

The Book of Revelation in the New Testament has the title, the "Apocalypse of John." Apocalypse has come to be used popularly as a synonym for catastrophe, but the word means revelation. That which is uncovered. It comes from the Greek word which literally means to pull the lid off something. Why did Albert Pike refer to Saint John the Baptist as the favorite apostle? What is the esoteric significance of the Book of Revelation? The Holy of Holies is a Biblical term referring to the inner sanctuary of the Tabernacle where God's presence appeared and where the Ark of the Covenant was held. In this video, he explains its esoteric significance. Short vid (17 min) but info packed.

Well Clyde, looks like they really did violate The First Amendment.

The courts are saying so (so far), until The NWO Democrats get the payoffs right.

All that Social Media Censoring "Requests" were illegal, but gee willikers, who and what enforces the "penalties" ??

Any bets TOS is neck deep in the "redacted" parts ?? ROFLULz 


ziLINK--> Appeals Court Finds Biden Admin Violated First Amendment By Encouraging Censorship 

Quote:A federal appeals court partially affirmed a lower court’s finding on Friday that Biden administration officials violated the First Amendment by coercing social media companies to censor speech.


The Fifth Circuit affirmed a lower court’s judgement that the White House, Surgeon General, CDC and FBI violated the First Amendment while finding that “the district court erred in finding that the NIAID Officials, CISA Officials, and State Department Officials likely violated Plaintiffs’ First Amendment rights.” Yet it found the injunction, issued by District of Louisiana Judge Terry A. Doughty in July, was “vague and broader than necessary.”

“Ultimately, we find the district court did not err in determining that several officials—namely the White House, the Surgeon General, the CDC, and the FBI—likely coerced or significantly encouraged social-media, platforms to moderate content, rendering those decisions state actions,” the court wrote. “In doing so, the officials likely violated the First Amendment.”

Historically the Earth has been several degrees warmer with no ice caps at the poles and colder (IE snow ball Earth)... it is called planetary climate cycles. Welcome to the solar system and living on a planet called Earth.

Recently, a scientist came out and admitted he manipulated climate data in order to have his paper published
and his prestige maintained. Of course, such a revelation needs to be attacked by the MSM and was quickly
jumped upon. But still, it does seem like Morpheus was correct when he stated: "you've been living in a dream
world, Neo"


Climate Wire announced yesterday (09/07/2023):

Quote:'A climate scientist ignited controversy Tuesday when he claimed that he withheld key details of his wildfire
research to fit “preapproved narratives” on climate risks in order to be published in one of the world’s most
esteemed science publications.


Patrick Brown, he said what should never be said.

The researcher, Patrick Brown, said he omitted “the full truth” about nonclimate causes of wildfire, such as
insufficient forest management, from a peer-reviewed study that showed how rising temperatures are increasing
the risk of wildfire, because he suspected editors of the journal Nature would have rejected his research if it failed
to exclusively blame human-caused greenhouse gases for intensifying blazes. Nature said his claims were untrue.

“I knew not to try to quantify key aspects other than climate change in my research because it would dilute the story
that prestigious journals like Nature and its rival, Science, want to tell,” Brown wrote in an opinion piece published
by the Free Press. Brown was hailed as a whistleblower by some conservative media outlets that sometimes promote
falsehoods around climate change.

His accusations were covered by FoxNews.com and the New York Post with headlines that indicated Brown’s claims
were evidence of corruption in climate science. But the editor-in-chief of Nature, Magdalena Skipper, said Brown’s
assertions were demonstrably false.

Before the paper was published, peer reviewers of Brown’s research pointed out that he excluded important variables
other than climate change that also affect wildfires, Skipper said. Brown argued against including those other variables,
she said.

“The only thing in Patrick Brown’s statements about the editorial processes in scholarly journals that we agree on is that
science should not work through the efforts by which he published this article,” Skipper said in a statement to E&E News.
“We are now carefully considering the implications of his stated actions; certainly, they reflect poor research practices
and are not in line with the standards we set for our journal.”

Skipper cited three pieces published in Nature in the last month that she said disprove Brown’s claims, because they
questioned or downplayed the role of climate change in ecological disasters. They include research on marine heat
waves, increased carbon emissions in the Amazon and the role of human activity in driving wildfires.

Brown, who did not respond to a request for comment, has a doctoral degree in earth and climate science from Duke
University. He is the co-director of the climate and energy team at the Breakthrough Institute, which has sometimes
been critical of climate claims in the media as well as climate policy. His Nature research was published last week.

“To put it bluntly, climate science has become less about understanding the complexities of the world and more about
serving as a kind of Cassandra, urgently warning the public about the dangers of climate change,” Brown wrote in the
Op-Ed. “However understandable this instinct may be, it distorts a great deal of climate science research, misinforms
the public, and most importantly, makes practical solutions more difficult to achieve.”

Brown’s claims were amplified by conservative media outlets.
The New York Post republished his op-ed with the headline “As a scientist, I’m not allowed to tell the full truth about
climate change.”

Fox News also reran the piece with the headline “Climate scientist admits editing paper to fit ‘preapproved narratives.’”
The right-wing Daily Mail wrote, “Top scientist Patrick Brown says he deliberately OMITTED key fact in climate change
piece he’s just had published in prestigious journal to ensure woke editors ran it.”

Marissa Streit, the CEO of PragerU, a far-right advocacy group that aims to bring climate denial videos into schools,
wrote on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, that Brown was “another example” of a scientist who’s brave enough
to speak out against their colleagues. “We’ve been attacked for giving a voice to scientists that have been bullied and
marginalized for not towing the elites’ climate change catastrophe narrative,” she wrote. “We will continue to give them
a voice.”

That firestorm of attention and distorted claims threaten to blow back on Brown’s seven co-authors, scientists said.
It’s not clear if any of his co-authors knew about Brown’s plans. They include recent graduates and early-career scientists.
None of them responded to requests for comment Wednesday. Brown’s actions are “monumentally unethical,” said Gavin
Schmidt, director of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies.

Over decades of research in the field, he said he could not remember another author treating publication as a “game.”
Brown’s actions won’t hurt his own job prospects since he is no longer an academic, but the controversy could follow
his colleagues throughout their careers, Schmidt said.

He added that Brown censored himself, rather than actually being told his paper wouldn’t be published if he broadened
his research. “He’s whistleblowing on himself — he did all of this,” Schmidt said. “Nobody did anything to him.”...'

Attached Files

Thumbnail(s)