Quote:A lot has happened in 2025. Yet, arguably the most substantial event(s) is something you've never heard of. And something that media outlets are scarcely covering. It's one of the most substantial heists in human history. And even though it took place in the United States, it will have ripple effects across the globe.

And it starts with a secretive company named Palantir.

Quote:July 1, 2025 / Joseph P. Farrell

Well it has finally happened, and I knew it would when I took my doctoral diploma from Oxford off the wall, and hid it in my closet because of the depraved depths to which it had sunk. What event has "finally happened". Oxford and Cambridge have both become C.S. Lewis's fictional Edgestow, and sold its old quadrangles for the pottage of his equally fictional, and quite prophetic scientism of the National Institute of Coordinated Experiments (N.I.C.E.).  I'm referring to the following story shared by W.G. (with our gratitude):

Controversy Erupts As Scientists Start Work To Create Artificial Human DNAThe Synthetic Human Genome Project is being funded by the Wellcome Trust, which has donated Rs 117 crore (10 million pounds).

Yes, you read that correctly: scientismists want to create synthetic human DNA, and they don't mean just tinkering with a few genes here or there, they want to synthesize all of it:

Quote:Scientists have begun work on a controversial project that aims to create human DNA from scratch. World's largest medical charity, the Wellcome Trust, has donated Rs 117 crore (10 million pounds) to start the project, which involves scientists from universities including Oxford, Cambridge and Imperial College.

Regarded as the building blocks of human life, DNA is made up of repeating units called nucleotides, which contain all the genetic information that physically makes us who we are. Scientists involved in the Synthetic Human Genome Project are now attempting to create a fully synthetic human chromosome, making up about two per cent of human DNA, as proof of concept. The ultimate aim is to maybe one day, create all of it from scratch. (Emphasis added)

And of course, the usual marketing gimmick accompanies this scientism: it is all about promoting human health and - here it comes - longevity:

Quote:"The sky is the limit. We are looking at therapies that will improve people's lives as they age, that will lead to healthier ageing with less disease as they get older," Dr Julian Sale, of the MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Cambridge, who is part of the project, told the BBC.

"We are looking to use this approach to generate disease-resistant cells we can use to repopulate damaged organs, for example, in the liver and the heart, even the immune system," he said.

As per Professor Matthew Hurles, director of the Wellcome Sanger Insititute, studying how genes and DNA regulate our bodies could help us pinpoint when they go wrong and ultimately develop better treatments.


"Building DNA from scratch allows us to test out how DNA really works and test out new theories, because currently we can only really do that by tweaking DNA in DNA that already exists in living systems," said Mr Hurles.

Do we really need to rehearse the dangers inherent in this whole project and its goal? They are trying to create the "perfect human", one devoid of "genetic imperfections" - with all their tendencies to various diseases and ailments and dismorphisms and frailties  - that afflict us all. That's the marketing and advertising for the scheme. But the ideas of "perfection" are going to be left up to the technocrats in charge of the project. Suppose they are successful in creating "the perfect man" - which they won't be, but just suppose they create something they believe to be "perfect" - will that "perfection" be able to avoid the typical human tendency to "look down upon" perceived inferiors (and by the way, those perceived inferiors are the rest of us)?  The answer to that question is provided by human history itself, with example after example of the "new man" slaughtering his "inferiors" at an industrial scale.


And this is the second problem with their scientism: not all of humanity's flaws are genetic. Indeed, most of them are not material flaws at all, and if you were paying attention in Sunday school those material flaws were somehow the material result - the effect - of deeper immaterial causes. Do we really want to bring longevity to the one-man horror shows and the long-train of abusers (to paraphrase the Declaration of Independence) that were Mao, Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot and so on?

We know what else will happen: already the scientismists have pointed the way by creating chimeras: growing human ears on pig embryos and putting human brain cells into mice. What's to stop the process in reverse? What if the "ideal of the perfect man" includes scorpion stingers, wings and feathers, prehensil tails? Why not create special chimerical "humanimals" or "manimals" to perform specific tasks? (Who needs robots, after all? We know the answer to that as well: whichever is cheaper and easier to control.)

Of course, no one will listen to those of us trying to sound the alarm about all of this,  because the scientismists will do it simply because they can, and because they've already convinced themselves that they are of sufficient wisdom to control it all, that they, indeed, did not fall, but that the rest of man did, and that they are here to help. Nevertheless, it needs to be said anyway: this is the path to to a  very inhuman hell.  Someday, perhaps even soon, everyone will be faced with a choice: either take the technological and technocratic immortality and hell of Lewis' National Institute of Coordinated Experiments (N.I.C.E.), or take another one that is entirely gratis.

See you on the flip side...

Quote:Like carbon for money



UPDATE 24MAR25: As if on cue, more revelations about the deep, deep fraud that is the NGO circuit actually running the world, and if you’re American, you’ve been paying for almost all of it. Stick with Radio Far Side and be ahead of the news.

OK, I think I’ve figured at least part of the global hide-the-sausage game we are all unwillingly or unwittingly playing.

Care to take a little trip to Low-Earth Orbit (LEO)? For this trip, I’ve adjusted the orbit to give us a bit higher apogee, so we can appreciate a little more of the Big Picture than usual.

As long-time readers know, a great part of my time is spent writing and editing high-level documents for NGOs and QGOs (quasi-governmental organisations). While the BRICS are trying to create a global trading currency based on a basket of national currencies, the Bumbledicks are trying to create a global currency based on electricity. Hear me out.

As best as I can piece all this together, the world has been operating with something called the PetroDollar (PD) since roughly the Nixon administration. While the US controls the PD, it is not the Federal Reserve Note (FRN), much less the Constitutional dollar most of us think of when we hear the word “dollar”.

The word "dollar" originates from the German word "Thaler," short for Joachimsthaler, which referred to silver coins minted in Joachimsthal (now in the Czech Republic) in the early 16th century. The term "Thaler" was widely used for large silver coins across Europe and evolved into various forms in different languages.

We are generations removed from that concept.

What seems to be going on is that NGOs will replace national and regional governments. These entities will act as local legislative, judicial and executive branches of a global UberCorp. Nation-states will vanish, with NGOs playing cops, judges, enforcers (executive), and legislators. They will take orders directly from UberCorp.

Keep in mind, this is “their” apparent concept. I’m just amalgamating what I read (and edit). Whatever UberCorp is, it is centered in the EU, and the EU is trying to create other EUs all over the planet.

If you’re wondering why the EU is in such a huff over Trumpism, this is why.

The global currency will be a kind of cryptocurrency based on generation, storage and use of electricity. The PetroDollar was based on petroleum, obviously, but the new currency is based on any fuel or device used to generate, transport, transform, or consume electricity. Hydrocarbons will only be a small part of this mix.

Carbon, the most ubiquitous element on the planet, will form the “small change” part of the new currency. Let’s call it Globobux for convenience, signified by REC. The flow of money, called “velocity” in our current markets, will be measures by electrons, or “physical electricity”. Capturing, storing and trading carbon will be the new Fort Knox to back Globobux.

Why RECs, I hear you ask. Good question. Gold star for you.

A REC (Renewable Energy Certificate) is a market-based instrument that represents proof that one megawatt-hour (MWh) of electricity was generated from a renewable energy source and fed into the power grid. Keep in mind that petroleum is a renewable resource created by electro-chemical processes — whether in the ground or in the lab.

It is essentially the “proof of work” (PoW) we discussed a week ago in “A Blockhead on Blockchain”. In other words, a REC is defined by the date the electrons entered the grid, plus data about the way those electrons were “created,” plus the time, place, fuel, and generator that created them. Sound familiar? Add SHA-256 encryption using a nonce and you have a block on the blockchain, very similar to Bitcoin.

The entire Climate Change/Global Warming/Energy Transition farce is all fabricated in order to: 1) create the REC system, 2) get you and me to buy into it, and 3) terrorize us with doomsday climate narradigms so we don’t back out.

The world has been divided into Regions (continents basically). The Regions are divided into Trade Zones (EU, NA, ECOWAS, ASEAN, MERCOSUR, etc.). The NGOs will eventually replace national governments. I don’t yet know what name these entities will have, but Local Issuers will become county/city/precinct subdivisions.

Essentially, I’m looking at a national government, replaced by corporate entities, with a global overlord running the show.

At the moment, the primary focus is on creating Global Standards (ISO, WTO, WHO, IFRS and the like), which are being “harmonized” at the Trade Zone level as we sit here.

The way is works is the global standards organizations create the rules, the QGOs generate synthesis at the regional level, and the NGOs install and operate the local functions.

The NGOs are the foot soldiers running around bribing and cajoling individual de jure governments to pass implementing legislation and regulations, so that all the pieces snap together like a giant puzzle.

This is not a “conspiracy theory”. I’m reading and editing the policy papers, and watching the organizations at work. There’s a huge amount of detail behind all this, and I encourage the dear reader to select any term I’ve used here and do a little research. The only thing I am adding to it is my guess as to how it all fits together.

The Big Question is, what is UberCorp. There is obviously “something” planning and directing all this, but what it is is anyone’s guess at the moment. BlackRock, Vanguard and their cousins are at the Vice President level, but they aren’t the UberCorp.

Larry Fink is clever, but he’s not that smart. The term “idiot savant” comes to mind.

I spend a couple of pages in my book discussing all the academic theory, philosophy and reasoning behind the need for a global government, but I have yet to find a suitable candidate for it.

We are looking at a maelstrom of power and wealth flowing into a central vortex, but its exact nature and location are obscured by sea spray, rain, and clouds. It’s by design, of course. It doesn’t want to be seen until it’s too late to change course.

If you want to see the new economy coming online, look up RECs, TIGRs, RE markets, and the various mechanisms for monetizing and controlling the most basic forces in the Universe. Most of the news cycle is designed to keep you from doing exactly this, so it’s a radical act to educate yourself.
Let’s try to summarize the existing system in “their” own words:

Quote:“Voluntary international MRV frameworks like GHGP, RE100, and SBTi, are the most adopted systems for corporate electricity buyers. In addition, the market is currently witnessing the emergence of a new paradigm of regional and international compliance MRV systems that may use RECs and similar market-based instruments to substantiate compliance-level clean electricity claims. Notable examples include the EU’s CBAM, and the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB)’s International Financial Reporting Standards 1 and 2 (IFRS S1 and IFRS S2).”

Essentially, there’s a verification hierarchy, driven by the EU, in which units of energy in the form of electricity can be traced with precision back to the point and fuel of origin. In other words, a blockchain on which an energy-based currency can be traded and taxed.

Quote:“These systems respectively focus on addressing emissions associated with the trade of physical goods, as well as corporate disclosure of environmental performance.”

Here we see carbon, the most plentiful element on the planet and basis for all life, being monetized as the foundation for a currency. This functions in much the same way as the ancient “gold standard”.

Finally, we see this:

Quote:“Each EAC [Ed. - Energy Attribute Certificate] must have a unique tracking number and should only reside in one account at a time to prevent double counting. Clear procedures should be established to resolve disputes over the validity and enforceability of claims, particularly in complex markets with multiple instruments.”

This essentially defines every bank note and cryptocoin in use. Thus, we are seeing the creation of an energy-based currency using blockchain technology intended minimally for cross-border transactions. The second sentence is just another way of saying “all debts public and private” and “full faith and credit”. It’s judicial authority to enforce contracts, which is a governmental function vested here in a private entity.

Note that I withheld the citation because the work is not yet published. However, the information can be found from multiple public sources. Every link is to a primary “legitimate” source. No tin-foil hats and wild-eyed ravings. The real thing.

As we’ve noted before, “they” are building the pyramid from the top down. There is a clear effort to rearrange the world into economic, rather than political entities. The UN forms the legislative branch, the QGOs and NGOs are the executive branch, and a gaggle of corporate entities known for now as trade zones form the judicial branch.

Money, once based on the element gold, then on hydrocarbons, and now on electrons, is being recreated as we speak. Sections of the world are already trading the RECs, and more are coming online.

The social credit system, the neo-economic system being forced down our throats, is being installed at the corporate level. We commonly refer to it as the ESG/DEI system.

Since humas have resisted this system, it is being installed in our “jobs”. Since we rely on “jobs” for revenue, and the “jobs” are almost all from corporate entities, the social credit system is simply installed at the level where most of us maintain survival.

If you want to eat, buy clothes, pay for shelter, have transportation, then you will comply with “job” requirements. If you don’t comply, you are let go and eventually become unhireable. If you can’t get a “job,” then you become reliant on government “safety nets,” where you once again face compliance issues to maintain welfare, health care, unemployment benefits, and/or retirement income.

If you can no longer buy food, pay for shelter, or get clothes without using e-funds, then eventually you will comply or be forced to live in the literal wilderness. If the only e-funds available to use for all your needs are based on gold, or oil, or carbon and electrons, then that is what you will use, or get used to fighting raccoons for nuts and berries.

In summary, the social credit/compliance system is being installed from the top down. We are being surrounded by it and eventually the switch will be thrown and no other system will exist. This is not a “conspiracy theory”. Once you know what to look for, it’s everywhere.

Once upon a time, salt and square nails were forms of currency, based on scarcity and need as a preservative for food, or fastener for construction. Those days have come and gone, replaced by other things. The one constant is that everyone uses a currency, or they starve in the cold, dark wilderness.

Today, the one thing everyone needs is electricity, and as long as “they” control the generation and transmission of it, “they” can make us dance on their strings.

Doulas Adams wrote about a civilization who used leaves for money, but there were so may leaves that inflation soon reared its ugly head. Their solution? Burn all the trees.

=====

Today’s cultural enrichment is selected both for its relevance, and because most folks here probably haven’t see it. The film is called The Platform (2019), a Spanish film about economic disparity and social capitulation. I think you’ll like this one. It’s got a “Cube” vibe to it.

Quote:We have been expecting the United Nations to fully empower itself from an international cooperative body to an international governing body (world government) for some time. The globalists have dreamed of this, and constitutionalists have feared it for 80 years -- even before the nation rejected the League of Nations after World War I.



They have themselves ever pushed toward that end, making name changes over time that only partially revealed their intent: internationalists, world government, the establishment, New World Order, World Order, and now globalism -- even the Great Reset movement. This is nothing new. It was accomplished Sept. 22-23, 2024, with no Biden Administration, Democrat, RINO, or Deep State media pushback and no vote of the people. It's no longer coming. World Government is here.


It is also not new that the Biden Administration should advance the United Nations government over all nations, ending the sovereignty of nations, especially our own, as preserved in our constitution. Biden was always a prominent globalist, even publishing his loyalty to it in 1992 ("How I Learned to Love The New World Order," by Senator Joe Biden, June 16, 2021, LibertyUnderFire.org ). Today, virtually all globalists in America are Democrats or RINOS.


World globalists have always viewed a nation's sovereignty as their enemy and wanted the World Health Organization Treaty to give them power over nations, but it was defeated. The vehicle they use to destroy national sovereignty is the World Health Organization (WHO), and the issue used is fear of a pandemic. The word used is emergency. What can't be portrayed as an emergency? This time, they took their request for more power to the UN General Assembly on Sept. 22-23. The United Nations adopted a 66-page document called "The Pact for the Future." It was passed through a new procedure called the "Silence Procedure.''


This procedure made it a pact. If no one objected enough to argue against it, it was on the record as automatically adopted. Apparently, 193 countries, including the United States, expressed no objection. The problem is that without defining an emergency, the UN gets to decide what an emergency is, which gives it unlimited power. National sovereignty is destroyed. A world government, with the only limitations being those it imposes on itself, rules.


Congressional warning of the United Nations' intent to unilaterally end national sovereignty came only from Republicans. They gathered on the grounds of the Capitol, hoping the national media (mostly controlled by the Deep State) would cover them. Party leaders intentionally did so on September 17, Constitution Day, the anniversary of our signing of the U.S. Constitution in 1787, which brought freedom from excessive government to us and those nations modeling it. Our constitution governs this nation and is a gift from God that cannot be trumped by government. Unless resisted -- and Biden/Harris did not -- what happened at the UN is a fatal blow to freedom and our constitution.


Some remarks regarding this mostly secret UN empowerment follow: Congressman Bob Good of Virginia reminded those on the grounds of the Capitol that President Trump had pulled us out of the WHO because it was working for world government, which Joe Biden reinstated and today fully supports. Good quoted from a chapter in the 66-page document "Summit for the Future's" website "called 'On transforming global governance ascending beyond the powers being sought by a subordinate agency,' the WHO, the UN is seeking even broader and more powerful authority," adding "they seek to facilitate the evolution of the UN from an international cooperative body to an international governing body." He said, "The American people didn't vote for this, and they don't support this."


Congressman Ralph Norman, South Carolina, "called on Donald Trump to 'draw out' of Kamala Harris 'whether or not she supports world government, and if she doesn't, for her to disavow what the Biden administration is doing right now to try to bring it about.'"
An unnamed congressman said, "They want to cede our sovereignty over to the United Nations and, in particular, the World Health Organization." He spoke of our annual assessments of $850 million to the WHO "to become enslaved to them." We need out.

 Why? "Because the World Health Organization has become captured by 'our international adversary, China.'" And, "We can't give up any more of our sovereignty."


Congressman Ronnie Jackson voiced what everyone probably felt: "With regard to the United Nations, I said it before, and I'll say it again. I think the best thing we can do for the United Nations is to go to New York and push the entire thing off into the East River."


Yet another unnamed Congresswoman said, "They are going to approve a platform, an emergency platform that will operationalize automatically. What does it mean to operationalize automatically? It means that once they have passed it through the United Nations, they don't have to ask other countries to approve it. They will just go forward with their protocols."


Another unnamed congressman identified likely emergencies to follow: "Pandemics, high impact events involving a biological agent, disruptions to global flows of goods, people or finance, disruptive activity in cyberspace, or disruption to global digital connectivity, major events in outer space, or black swan events." This leads to their getting "involved pretty much whenever and wherever they want to" (House Republicans Rally Against --The UN & World Health Organization to protect American Sovereignty, live press conference on Capitol grounds, Sept. 17, 2024). Countries, as ruling governments, will become virtually obsolete.


Welcome to the Deep State's New World Order. Everyone on Earth is controlled. Sounds like Lucifer's plan that made him a dark angel -- an enemy of God and man.


Harold W. Pease, Ph.D., is an expert on the United States Constitution and a syndicated columnist. He has dedicated his career to studying the writings of the Founding Fathers and applying that knowledge to current events. He taught history and political science from this perspective for over 30 years. To read more of his weekly columns, visit LibertyUnderFire.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.

Quote:The nation’s ruling class holds deeply authoritarian opinions widely divorced from the rest of the American electorate, finds a survey out this week. It found nearly 60 percent of American “elites” think there is too much individual freedom in America. Meanwhile, nearly 60 percent of registered voters have the exact opposite opinion, reporting the United States has too much top-down control, limiting liberty. 

The study, titled “Them Vs. U.S,” defined the American “elite” as “having a postgraduate degree, a household income of more than $150,000 annually, and living in a zip code with more than 10,000 people per square mile.” Such people account for about 1 percent of Americans. The study also examined a sub-sample of the 1 percent who graduated from Ivy League schools or other name-brand institutions such as Northwestern, Duke, Stanford, and the University of Chicago.

The study from the Committee to Unleash Prosperity found ruling class opinions on climate policies were particularly harsh and despotic. More than two-thirds of the 1 percent support rationing vital energy and food sources in an attempt to control the globe’s weather. That number jumped to nearly 90 percent among the Ivy Leaguers. Around two-thirds of normal registered voters, however, oppose rationing vital resources.
Limiting food and water consumption is a serious proposition to global leaders. For example, the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group, an environmentalist organization of city leaders across the globe, has proposed annihilating meat and dairy consumption by 2030. 
“An astonishing 72% of the Elites – including 81% of the Elites who graduated from the top universities – favor banning gas cars,” the study authors continued. “And majorities of elites would ban gas stoves, non-essential air travel, SUVs, and private air conditioning.”
Elites’ view of other elites is very different from regular registered voters’ view of elites. On the education front, “Two-thirds (67%) [of the 1 percent] say teachers and other educational professionals should decide what children are taught rather than letting parents decide.” Only 38 percent of registered voters felt the same. 

“About six of ten elites have a favorable opinion of the so-called talking professions—lawyers, lobbyists, politicians, and journalists,” wrote the study authors. Additionally, “In stark contrast to the rest of America, 70% of the Elites trust the government to ‘do the right thing most of the time.’”
Unsurprisingly, “about three-quarters of these cultural elites are Biden supporters.” While only 20 percent of Americans say they are better off financially under Biden, nearly three-quarters of the elites say they are better off under Biden.
The study comes as global leaders meet in Davos, Switzerland for the World Economic Forum’s annual meeting to discuss draconian climate policies and crackdowns on freedom of speech and therefore freedom of thought. So far at the conference, elites have discussed establishing a “new world order,” lobbied for censorship in the name of “disinformation and misinformation,” and labeled farming and fishing “ecocide.” 
The WEF policy proposals and the results of this survey reveal what the Committee to Unleash Prosperity describes as a “Grand Canyon-sized chasm” between regular citizens and those who largely claim the expertise and power to rule over others with or without their consent. 

“These results confirm what people have long suspected,” wrote the study authors: “Today, there are two Americas. One is wealthier, more highly educated, and attended the best schools. They put much more trust in big government ‘to do the right thing’ and, by their own admission, benefit from more expansive government policies. They have also been hurt far less by the high inflation of the Biden presidency than those who live from paycheck to paycheck and are in the lower and middle classes.”

Quote:World Economic Forum Chairman Klaus Schwab envisioned a future without elections, predicting that voting will no longer be needed as artificial intelligence will be able to predict who voters would want in power.



Schwab spoke to Google co-founder Sergey Brin on stage at the WEF gathering and discussed the predicting powers of AI technology.


"Digital technologies mainly have an analytical power; now we go into a predictive power, and we have seen the first examples, and your company very much evolved into it," he told the Google founder. "The next step could be to go into a prescriptive mode, which means you do not even have to have elections any more because you can already predict."


Next, with the audience eerily silent, Schwab then asked if elections would even be necessary given that the outcomes would already be predicted.

"Afterwards you can say 'why do we need elections?' because we know what the result will be."

Brin then pontificated about eliminating world leaders — replaced by an AI decision-making apparatus — and praised Schwab for his "profound" thoughts.

Schwab later explained that a "crucial issue" that needs to be tackled would be how humanity is viewed.


"We need new concepts to define what humanity is and what's the purpose of our lives is," 

Quote: Let’s stop the wishful thinking and face the stark reality: There is a clear path to dictatorship in the United States, and it is getting shorter every day. In 13 weeks, Donald Trump will have locked up the Republican nomination. In the RealClearPolitics poll average (for the period from Nov. 9 to 20), Trump leads his nearest competitor by 47 points and leads the rest of the field combined by 27 points. The idea that he is unelectable in the general election is nonsense — he is tied or ahead of President Biden in all the latest polls — stripping other Republican challengers of their own stated reasons for existence.
[…] Are we going to do anything about it? To shift metaphors, if we thought there was a 50 percent chance of an asteroid crashing into North America a year from now, would we be content to hope that it wouldn’t? Or would we be taking every conceivable measure to try to stop it, including many things that might not work but that, given the magnitude of the crisis, must be tried anyway?
Will those who balked at resisting Trump when the risk was merely political oblivion suddenly discover their courage when the cost might be the ruin of oneself and one’s family? (more)