Biden Punishes Drillers With 15-Fold Increase In Permitting Costs, Plans To Block Arc

[Infolurker]

Just shut up and buy a battery powered car you will not be allowed to charge.

Biden Punishes Drillers With 15-Fold Increase In Permitting Costs, Plans To Block Arctic Oil Extraction

https://news.bloomberglaw.com/environmen...deral-land

Oil industry groups are already threatening to litigate because they argue the costs will drive oil companies away from federal land.



The rule is part of the Biden administration’s climate agenda to cut greenhouse gas emissions and conserve land and wildlife habitat while requiring oil and gas producers to pay fees that more accurately reflect the environmental impact of producing oil and gas on federal land.


“These are the most significant reforms to the federal oil and gas leasing program in decades, and they will cut wasteful speculation, increase returns for the public, and protect taxpayers from being saddled with the costs of environmental cleanups,” Interior Secretary Deb Haaland said in a statement.


“This rule will help protect critical wildlife habitat, cultural resources, and recreational values, and it will ensure a fair return for American taxpayers,” BLM Director Tracy Stone-Manning said in a statement.

The bonding amounts are “excessive” considering there are only a handful of orphaned wells on federal land, said Kathleen Sgamma, president of the Western Energy Alliance.


“The BLM rules will drive small producers off public lands and we will have to litigate,” she said.
Pollution from oil and gas is a primary cause of climate change, but the American Petroleum Institute said oil and gas are essential for energy security, and the rule threatens that.


“Overly burdensome land management regulations will put this critical energy supply at risk,” Holly Hopkins, API vice president for upstream policy, said in a statement.


Environmental groups hailed the rules as a win for wildlife.

https://www.allsides.com/news/2024-04-12...lans-block

One week after the Biden administration slapped new regulations on key power grid components, the Washington Post reports that US oil and gas companies will face a 15-fold increase in costs to drill on federal land, under a new rule released on Friday.


Under it, the Interior Department's Bureau of Land Management will require drillers to pay $150,000 per lease on federal lands, up from $10,000 - the first comprehensive update to the federal oil and gas leasing program in over three decades.


Fossil fuel companies will also be required to pay higher royalties to the government on oil and gas extracted from federal lands - jumping from 12.5% of revenue to 16.67%.
That's not all...


The rule comes as the Biden administration readies a sweeping plan to limit future oil drilling across roughly 13 million acres of Alaska's North Slope, which the US set aside a century ago as an emergency supply.
[/url]
That initiative, set to be finalized in the coming days per [url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-04-11/biden-plans-sweeping-effort-to-block-arctic-oil-drilling?sref=6uww027M]Bloomberg, comes as both oil executives and Alaska lawmakers have sounded the alarm over the plan - saying that it could thwart oil and gas development throughout the reserve, even on existing leases.


The Interior Department said in a preamble the regulation wouldn’t affect existing leases. But the proposed rule text doesn’t offer similar, explicit assurance. Instead, it proposes to give the government broad authority to limit or bar access to existing leases, “regardless of any existing authorization.” Oil leasing and infrastructure development would be presumed not to be permitted unless specific information clearly demonstrates the work can be done with “no or minimal adverse effects” on the habitat.


"This would be bad for America’s energy security," Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) said on X, adding "It would openly defy federal law while ignoring rising energy prices and growing global volatility. "
"It would yet again sanction Alaska instead of nations like Russia, Iran, and Venezuela," she added.
This would be bad for America’s energy security. It would disrespect Alaska Natives on the North Slope, who were ignored in a sham public process. It would openly defy federal law while ignoring rising energy prices and growing global volatility. It would yet again sanction…


— Sen. Lisa Murkowski (@lisamurkowski) April 12, 2024
The Biden administration has argued that the changes are necessary to protect 'sensitive landscapes' that provide habitat for polar bears, migratory birds and caribou.


"We must do everything within our control to meet the highest standards of care to protect this fragile ecosystem," said Interior Secretary Deb Haaland said in announcing the measure last year, Bloomberg continues.
How very inflationary...

[xuenchen]

Do electric cars really produce fewer carbon emissions than petrol or diesel vehicles?


So if they keep manufacturing EVs, the carbon cycle never ends, in fact it's worse!!

Who's the joke on again?

[Ninurta]

I don't understand quite why they don't just kill and eat the polar bears, caribou, and migratory birds. There's poor folks around who would love to have some of that protein! If they did that, they could then free up oil fields to, you know, extract oil from!

I mean, they did it with the buffalo to free up land for farming (except they generally didn't eat them - they just skinned them and took the tongues), so why not with the polar bears, caribou, and migratory birds, too?

Nobody needs polar bears. They're nasty, huge, and brutish, more dangerous than a grizzly. I'd bet dollars against donuts that there are plenty of caribou on non-oil lands, so we wouldn't miss those eaten off the oil lands. And migratory birds - if they're migrating to the North Banks of Alaska, how smart or even useful could they be? Certainly no smarter or useful than dodos and puffins, so eat them, too.

Problem solved. Two problems, actually - oil and feeding an over-populated planet with quality proteins rather than poisonous bugs.

.