Here's a thing. I trawl about in the internet and search for strange articles to put on our favourite website.
My penchant is crypto-style stuff that may hint at unusual accounts of things we generally believe cannot be or happen.
My opinion on whether something is true or not comes secondary to myself as for years I've witnessed -during my past
employment and by simply running a story to ground, that most media articles are invented around a tiny kernel of truth.
Anyway, I eventually came across a story from Bristol in England in 2014 where a large crocodile was reported to have
been seen in the vicinity. Police announced on Twitter that a bus driver had observed the six-feet long reptile beneath a
bridge known as 'Coronation Bridge' in the South-West city. However, when investigated, the Police found nothing.
Strange in itself as crocodiles are not indigenous to chilly isles of Great Britain, but when I went to view the actual site
on Google Maps, I found that the law enforcement may have been tweeting about the actual bridge and not the scaly
monster! The Daily Mail article labels the bridge as Coronation Bridge, but the map AND Wikipedia states the bridge
is called 'Bedminster Bridge' and Wikipedia mentions older names, but not Coronation bridge.
I hear you saying to yourself, "So what BIAD...? A media-outlet got a name wrong, big deal!"
But I looked further into the odd reports regarding these tropical amphibians vacationing in the land of boiled food and
warm beer. One of the sparse accounts comes from my neck-of-the-woods close to the city of Newcastle Upon Tyne.
This article was from The Independent newspaper of 2000 and begins with:
Heaton Park is a small public park and has gone through many changes in its past. So I took a small walk down the
rabbit holes of the internet and discovered something that suggest that -once again, what we're told often isn't accurate.
"There have been many alterations to the park over the subsequent 135 years or so, some of which
we can see from looking at old photographs like those below: the bear set free from (or more likely
died in) its pit by the lake, the lake filled in, the croquet lawn converted to a bowling green (which
itself is now no more), the ‘temple’ claimed by its original owners, the Ridley family, and removed
to Blagdon, the park-keeper’s cottage demolished, the large pavilion burnt down and a replica
subsequently constructed and famously the old bowls pavilion burnt down by suffragettes.
A lake which is shown c100m north-east of the temple was drained in the mid C20...''
Source:
The lake was drained at the middle of the twentieth century...?! Then how can one who reads The Independent
jog around the Heaton Park Lake in the year 2000? Maybe those who genuinely do research for their own interests
could assist the media-outlet?
"...The north-west side of the park was the site of a bearpit, which was infilled in 1891.
The 1859-64 OS map shows that the pattern of planting in Heaton Park has changed little
with the exception of the Hall (erected c1713, demolished mid C20) and its immediate
surroundings which lay south-east of the present park boundary in an area which has
been built over and is outside the registered area.
A lake which is shown c100m north-east of the temple was drained in the mid C20..."
Source:
There are other websites that offer the same fact that Heaton Park pond was no more long before the scary
time of the Y2K came around. So how can an alligator or a crocodile be seen and reported in 2000, when
no lake existed for it to be seen in?!
Me-thinks shite is alive and well and living on some News Desks!!
My penchant is crypto-style stuff that may hint at unusual accounts of things we generally believe cannot be or happen.
My opinion on whether something is true or not comes secondary to myself as for years I've witnessed -during my past
employment and by simply running a story to ground, that most media articles are invented around a tiny kernel of truth.
Anyway, I eventually came across a story from Bristol in England in 2014 where a large crocodile was reported to have
been seen in the vicinity. Police announced on Twitter that a bus driver had observed the six-feet long reptile beneath a
bridge known as 'Coronation Bridge' in the South-West city. However, when investigated, the Police found nothing.
Strange in itself as crocodiles are not indigenous to chilly isles of Great Britain, but when I went to view the actual site
on Google Maps, I found that the law enforcement may have been tweeting about the actual bridge and not the scaly
monster! The Daily Mail article labels the bridge as Coronation Bridge, but the map AND Wikipedia states the bridge
is called 'Bedminster Bridge' and Wikipedia mentions older names, but not Coronation bridge.
I hear you saying to yourself, "So what BIAD...? A media-outlet got a name wrong, big deal!"
But I looked further into the odd reports regarding these tropical amphibians vacationing in the land of boiled food and
warm beer. One of the sparse accounts comes from my neck-of-the-woods close to the city of Newcastle Upon Tyne.
This article was from The Independent newspaper of 2000 and begins with:
Quote:"...A jog around Heaton Park pond in Newcastle upon Tyne carried something of the peril of a trip
around the Louisiana Swamps on Tuesday. Police were investigating reports of a strange rustling
in the reeds.
Visitors to the park are convinced they have seen a 6ft alligator lurking beneath the water. Officers
were understandably sceptical at first but, after continued sightings, have called in reptile experts
who believe they may be looking for a spectacled caiman alligator, found primarily in South
America but sold widely in the exotic pet trade...'
Heaton Park is a small public park and has gone through many changes in its past. So I took a small walk down the
rabbit holes of the internet and discovered something that suggest that -once again, what we're told often isn't accurate.
"There have been many alterations to the park over the subsequent 135 years or so, some of which
we can see from looking at old photographs like those below: the bear set free from (or more likely
died in) its pit by the lake, the lake filled in, the croquet lawn converted to a bowling green (which
itself is now no more), the ‘temple’ claimed by its original owners, the Ridley family, and removed
to Blagdon, the park-keeper’s cottage demolished, the large pavilion burnt down and a replica
subsequently constructed and famously the old bowls pavilion burnt down by suffragettes.
A lake which is shown c100m north-east of the temple was drained in the mid C20...''
Source:
The lake was drained at the middle of the twentieth century...?! Then how can one who reads The Independent
jog around the Heaton Park Lake in the year 2000? Maybe those who genuinely do research for their own interests
could assist the media-outlet?
"...The north-west side of the park was the site of a bearpit, which was infilled in 1891.
The 1859-64 OS map shows that the pattern of planting in Heaton Park has changed little
with the exception of the Hall (erected c1713, demolished mid C20) and its immediate
surroundings which lay south-east of the present park boundary in an area which has
been built over and is outside the registered area.
A lake which is shown c100m north-east of the temple was drained in the mid C20..."
Source:
There are other websites that offer the same fact that Heaton Park pond was no more long before the scary
time of the Y2K came around. So how can an alligator or a crocodile be seen and reported in 2000, when
no lake existed for it to be seen in?!
Me-thinks shite is alive and well and living on some News Desks!!
Read The TV Guide, yer' don't need a TV.