![[Image: 1oc0WbU.jpg]](https://i.imgur.com/1oc0WbU.jpg)
Quote:THOSE IRANIAN CRYPTO-CURRENCY ACCOUNTS & CENTRAL BANK…The Giza Death Star
June 23, 2025 / Joseph P. Farrell
If you're like me you've been closely glued to the developing events in Iran ever since the Trump administration took the decision to use bunker busting bombs against Iran's underground nuclear facilities. Since the event, the commentary, kuddos, and condemnations have been freely flowing. However, I'm not here to advance any particular policy nor view of the events currently being debated, but rather, to point out a couple of very odd factoids and to do my usual Wile E. Coyote nosedive off of the twig of high octane speculation into the canyon below as to what it all might mean.
The first little factoid needs little to no explanation, because if you've been paying attention, it falls very quickly and easily into the "I told you so" box. According to this story shared by W.G. (with our gratitude), the usual "unspecified hackers" have apparently "drained" crypto-currency accounts in (you guessed it) Iran:
Hackers with Likely Ties to Israel Wipe Out $90M from Iran Crypto Exchange Used by Terrorists
Now, you'll have noted from the headline itself that these "unspecified hackers" are in fact from Israel, and that the crypto-accounts targets were allegedly those "used by terrorists". So let us note the following things about this in relationship to the ever-evolving narrative about the security of crypto-currency. We started out the crypto-craze, you'll recall, with confident assertions of the fad's complete unhackability, utter privacy and security, and how it was all going to end central bank monopolies on money-issuance and control. Then, gradually, the stories started to appear that this or that root system had been hacked, stories that were carefully reported (to draw an analogy to how the media likes to bury stories while pretending to report them) on page 4 at the bottom right hand in a story that ran two whole column inches, in the women's squash team sub-section of the sports pages, and right next to the daily jumble puzzle.
So much for all the claims about crypto-currencies. But I want to draw attention to another aspect of this story, one that illustrates what my principal concern all along has been, and it is a concern shared by Catherine Austin Fitts, and many other crypto-critics. The system itself is designed to be for the explicit purpose of a social credit and surveillance system. If you don't behave and like and support the things we, Mr. Globaloney, tell you to like and support, then we'll devalue, or even completely shut down, your money supply until you do. In this case, the nasty Iranian regime had accounts hacked by the Israeli regime. Just imagine what you could do with a whole network of computers being run by comprised systems all over the world (think PROMIS here) that are in charge of national "sovereign 'wealth'" funds that include family sponsored cryo-'currency' "assets".
And we can confidently predict the result of this Israeli hacktivity: For All Your Covert Operations Needs, Use Cash. If the Iranian regime was stupid enough to fund its terrorism activities via crypto-currency accounts then rest assured it is already reassessing that platform.
But there's an even larger picture looming behind the events in Iran. Already we've seen the Iranian crown prince recording videos asking the Iranian people to rise up and overthrow the regime. One senses a bit of deja vu in all of this: we're back in the 1950s, with the election of Mossadegh, and Iran's nationalization of the various British petroleum interests in that country. We all know the story: the Clowns in American in concert with Britain's MI-6 staged a coup, overthrew Mossadegh, and installed the Shah, Reza Pahlavi, back on the Peacock Throne, whose SAVAK secret police quickly established itself as a rival to the current Iranian regime for its inventive and creative brutality against its own people, leading, of course, to the conditions that created his overthrow.
There is, however, yet another thing that is not even being mentioned by the media in all of this - both pro- and anti- Israel/Iran, and it is something that should be front and center in the discussion.
Remember Moammar Qaddafi? The leader of Libya once reviled (rightly) as a sponsor of "state terrorism", who "turned the cheek" and decided to dismantle his country's support for terrorism and, incidentally, its own nuclear aspirations? He, too, was running an "Islamic state" based on the lack of usury and a central bank along the western model. Indeed, he was taking steps to establish a currency for Africa based on (here it comes), gold. And by the way, while we're at it, have you noticed all the neural linguistic programming going on lately with the root word "gold"? "Golden age", "golden era", "pure gold", "gold-backed crypto-currencies" etc, etc? [Golden Dome]
So in addition to all the deja vu over the current events in Iran and their similarities to events of merely a few decades ago, whatever the motivations of the deep "geopolifinance" of those events might be, you can add yet another: namely, that Iran "needs" a central bank that Mr. Globaloney controls so that it can "enter" the "community of nations" and live "peaceably" with its neighbours...
... while being plundered. The word from American history for this whole operation and technique is "reconstruction"(see my two books, The Rialto in Richmond, and The Rialto in Richmond Reconstructed). It's been updated a bit, and now includes the phrases "nation-building" and "regime change", but it's still reconstruction, and is still being done at the point of bayonets and bombs.
See you on the flip side...
"It is hard to imagine a more stupid or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people who pay no price for being wrong." – Thomas Sowell
