Then there's the Church of Science, a cathedral that watches for those who step out of line!
Quote:Bombshell UFO testimony dubbed 'implausible' as expert demands real evidence of spacecraftArchived Daily Express Article:
"I think what I find most surprising is that lawmakers seem to be taking him so seriously at this
point," said physicist Professor Jonathan Blazek.
'Real, hard evidence is needed before last week’s “implausible” US Congressional testimony on
UFOs by ex-intelligence officer David Grusch can be held as anything but science fiction.
Ex-intelligence officer David Grusch Physicist Professor Jonathan Blazek.
That is the appraisal of physicist Professor Jonathan Blazek of Northeastern University, who said
he “[didn’t] find Grusch very credible” after reading a summary report on hearing. Mr Grusch -a former
intelligence officer and US Air Force veteran -had told the House Oversight Subcommittee that the
US is retrieving and reverse-engineering alien spaceships.
He added that “non-human biologics” have also been recovered from crash sites, and that he “knows
the exact location” of a site where the government is poring over alien artefacts. However, Mr Grusch
repeatedly backed away from offering specifics or evidence in support of his claims, saying that he
couldn’t “discuss that publicly” -a tendency that Prof. Blazek said was “very frustrating”.
Alongside being vague, Prof. Blazek noted Grusch has been making “increasingly implausible claims”
-including the suggestion that the allegedly retrieved alien spacecraft have come from other physical
dimensions.
The physicist told Northeastern Global News: “I think what I find most surprising is that lawmakers
seem to be taking him so seriously at this point. I’m sure they know things that I don’t.” He suggested
that it may be that members of Congress “don’t want to be seen as suppressing anything, so it’s better
to be transparent about the sorts of claims being made.
“Hopefully this is part of a process to get everything out into the open so that the community can proceed
to looking into the more credible and/or actually mysterious things,” he said. However, Prof. Blazek added:
“I don’t think this particular hearing will make the public take the claims of ‘aliens’ more seriously.”
Prof. Blazek said he is looking forward to reading the soon-to-be-published report from an independent panel
of scientists selected by NASA, who will be looking into so-called “Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena” (UAP).
The panel includes retired astronaut Scott Kelly, NASA advisor David Grinspoon of the Planetary Science
Institute in Tucson, Arizona and astrophysicist Professor Federica Bianco of the University of Delaware.
Announcing the launch of the panel last October, Thomas Zurbuchen, NASA science mission directorate
associate administrator, said: “Exploring the unknown in space and the atmosphere is at the heart of who
we are at NASA. “Understanding the data we have surrounding unidentified anomalous phenomena is
critical to helping us draw scientific conclusions about what is happening in our skies.
Data is the language of scientists and makes the unexplainable, explainable.”
Prof. Blazek added: “There’s probably been a realisation in the last decades that the culture around this has
gotten sort of toxic, on both sides. “Actual explanations for some of these events would be really interesting.”
To date, the Pentagon has not acknowledged the existence of UFOs of proven extraterrestrial origins.
In fact, back in April, Professor Sean Kirkpatrick — a materials physicist and director of the US Department
of Defense’s All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) — testified to a Senate Committee that AARO
“had found no credible evidence thus far of extraterrestrial activity, off-world technology, or objects that defy
the known laws of physics”...'
Read The TV Guide, yer' don't need a TV.