Meme Scholar with Madness (PhD)

[EndtheMadnessNow]

Friday night double-feature post...


Convention 1964 – Nelson Rockefeller And The Creeping Extremism Of The GOP – July 14, 1964


WTF?! Nuclear rhetoric. What could go wrong?!

To deal with these realities, the United States must put aside the counterproliferation playbook and change the subject from arms control to firepower. This is both a DoD issue and, more specifically, a Navy issue, in which the sea-launched nuclear-armed cruise missile (SLCM-N) should play an initial prominent role. The Navy’s dispersion at sea provides the best advantage in every theater, with submarines, surface warships, and aviation squadrons able to close what retired Navy Admiral Charles Richard, while commander of U.S. Strategic Command, called a serious “deterrence-assurance-escalation” gap caused by the tactical hole in U.S. nuclear capabilities and posture.

The Navy Needs Tactical Nuclear Weapons . . . Again

'Sorry sir, all our sailors & soldiers have morphed into highly emotional snowflakes and we'll have to use our last resort. Don't worry, it'll all be over quick.'

Funny, the motto painted on the front of one of the ships I was stationed on read, "Peace through Superior Firepower".

Only people at the Pentagon would think "tactical nuclear weapons" could be used in a war & winnable and that it wouldn't rapidly escalate into an all-out nuclear war. Does the Pentagon have "acceptable" casualties in a nuclear exchange, making the use of these weapons plausible?



Even more concerning...


On March 28, 2022, the Biden administration sent to Congress a revised version of its classified National Defense Strategy. The new version removed the longstanding doctrine of “no first use” of nuclear weapons, and opened the door to a nuclear response to a non-nuclear threat. Within months of the new U.S. policy, but without referring to it, the Putin administration responded that it might consider first use in case of an existential threat to Russia, including a non-nuclear one.  More recently, Sergei Karaganov, head of the Council on Foreign and Defense Policy, a non-governmental Russian think tank, argued that perhaps Russia should use a low yield tactical nuclear weapon in order to convince NATO to back off and stop threatening Russia’s security.




In 1955, GM engineers thought we would have flying cars by 1970. What happened?



They lost The Flying Car Contract to Lockheed Skunkworks.





Don’t let big bad Pope scare ya. He sold his soul to the defense industry. The secret "too terrible to be told" is what those in power call "CATASTROPHIC DISCLOSURE." That is, disclosure of the crimes against humanity committed in order to protect an illegal monopoly on advanced (ET) tech.




Question everything. What would the motivation be? What’s the desired outcome? Who would benefit financially from this information?
Follow the $$$ and belief systems.



It's been going on for thousands of years...


Preachers and UFOs