From soccer moms to parent activists: Moms for Liberty

[Infolurker]

I wouldn't reference the disgraced SPLC for anything.

Southern Poverty Law Center has been toughly disgraced and is illegitimate as anything other than a leftist lobbyist organization. Their own employees have called it a "Highly Profitable Scam" using fear mongering to raise funds. Scoring and "F" on Charity Watch.

Hate is anything disagreeing with SPLC's beliefs. Partisan Progressive hit organization. Oh, and they are registered lobbyist.. I bet you can guess for who?

Too may links, stories, and sources to post. This will suffice.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2...022301001/

These shameful secrets are no longer hidden in shadows. The New York Times, Politico, NPR and a host of other mainstream publications are reporting on the corruption and widening credibility gap. The SPLC dismissed its co-founder in March, and its president has resigned amidst numerous claims of sexual harassment, gender discrimination and racism within the organization — a parade of disgraces that vividly force the conclusion: The SPLC is hollow, rotten and failing at the very virtues it pretends to celebrate.

The criticism comes from many corners. There’s the Current Affairs editor who seems sympathetic to the center’s progressive mission but decries its “hate group” list as an “outright fraud” and a “willful deception designed to scare older liberals into writing checks to the SPLC.” 

There’s the retired investigative journalist who helped research and write an eight-part series on the center’s “litany of problems and questionable practices” in the mid-1990s. His Washington Post opinion piece reads with a thinly veiled message: We nearly got a Pulitzer Prize for TELLING YOU SO. 


But perhaps most damning of all are the indictments leveled by former employee Bob Moser in The New Yorker. He remembers being welcomed to the “Poverty Palace” and recounts the heart-sinking reality of it all — being “pawns” in a “highly profitable scam.”