(06-18-2023, 07:30 PM)NightskyeB4Dawn Wrote: But in both situations the doctors claim there is no proof that the vaccines had anything to do with their children developing autism. And they could not tell them why they developed autism but showed no signs until after the vaccines.
What needs to be pointed out here, and understood, is that when someone tells you "there is no evidence for that" in regard to anything at all, what they are not saying - but what is emphatically implied - is that there is also no evidence for the contrary. If there WAS any evidence to the contrary, they would be quick to point that out. What they are really saying is "there needs to be a lot more study of the matter so we can say for sure one way or the other".
That applies to not only just this subject, but to ANY "scientific" claims - from "climate change" right down to "fuel economy".
.