The 'Weirder' Side Of News!

[BIAD]

I believe this tactic is how the media casts spells using specific words & phrases throughout news stories. Then over time they are able to track 'n trace these words (or unique names) or phrases to monitor the effect of their spells. This I believe is one of the key reasons why the msm refused to let "Q" die, as many of those popular words/phrases were recited throughout news stories over & over. And like you mentioned a certain word/name/phrase can go back years and outta the blue that same word from an unrelated story pops-up that acts as a trigger. It can also be used as clandestine communication with other journalists...

I tried to add to your opinion... but I believe you hit all the points. It is a working of incantations and it has enchanted
the public for centuries, a substantial length of time that the system of news-reporting believes it is immovable.

...I believe in journalism this falls under the term "Evergreen" which is content that is not time-sensitive. Such content does not rely on current events, where an evergreen story can be prepared, then mothballed until it is needed to fill time on a slower news day or on a holiday, or a distraction. They probably maintain a database of trigger words/phrases (spells) to meet whatever opportunity, distraction, target.

Once a spell is cast, it is tagged and they just monitor the current flow of traffic and spring another spell/hypnotic construct if/when the sheep steer off course or need another distraction. Also, as we have noticed they (the masters of word-smithing) are changing/re-defining the English language once again.

Again, very true. The wording for such non-time-sensitive articles are presented to shroud this delay and any
complaints are dealt with off-screen and off-paper. I've had it happen personally. The control is hard for many
to believe and it would be objectively correct to assume it's all in the name of ratings and maintenance of the
stranglehold Journalists have on information-purveyance.

But the art of word-smithing and the regulation of 'facts' go hand-in-hand and cannot survive independently.
It is real and there's a lot of work that goes into it to make sure it's kept from the eyes of those who still
think what the media offers is important.