LIVE: NASA's UFO study team holds a public meeting

[quintessentone]

They are calling this the "Age of Transparency", but how can they be transparent when they first have to take baby steps in learning how to identify these UAPs?

For instance:

At one point during the hearing, a video taken by a naval aircraft over the western US showed a series of dots moving across the night sky. The military plane was unable to intercept the object, which turned out to be a commercial aircraft heading towards a major airport.

]David Spergel, chair of Nasa's UAP team, mentioned a burst of radio waves picked up by researchers in Australia. "They had really strange structure. People couldn't figure out what was going on. Then they start to notice a lot of them bunched together around lunch time," he said. It turned out that the sensitive instruments used by researchers were picking up signals from a microwave used to heat up their lunches. Scott Kelly, a former astronaut and pilot with decades of experience, told a story about an optical illusion.

He and his co-pilot were flying near Virginia Beach and his colleague "was convinced we flew by a UFO". "I didn't see it. We turned around, we went to look at it, it turns out it was Bart Simpson - a balloon."

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-65729356

From your video, the interviewee states that people need to learn how to their cameras operate. I have always said this but we also need to know the limitations of surveillance systems in planes and, as stated above, even scientific instruments can pick up human activities, such as microwaving a lunch.

Final outcome of that meeting? They need better data. Duh! This has been the problem all along.

Here's the newest potato camera.