(10 hours ago)quintessentone Wrote:(10 hours ago)Ninurta Wrote:(11 hours ago)quintessentone Wrote:(Yesterday, 05:17 PM)Ninurta Wrote:(Yesterday, 03:44 PM)quintessentone Wrote: If Iran wanted to destroy Israel they could have done it easily within that timeframe. Israel can't win any wars without the USA .
Not old enough to remember the Six Day War, I see.
Quote:It's not about that it's about Zionist donors buying your government leaders to push Zionist expansionist goals in that region.
That is perilously close to the White Supremacist doctrine regarding the "ZOG" (Zionist Occupation Government) in America. I remember the KKK pushing that pretty hard.
No one else back then, just the White Supremacists.
Are yo asserting that the White Supremacists were correct in their assumptions?
.
I followed the money and I hazard a guess so do the extreme right wingers in your country.
"Miriam Adelson, a dual Israeli-American billionaire and widow of casino magnate Sheldon Adelson, is one of the most prominent Zionist billionaires to donate to Donald Trump’s campaign. She has contributed $100 million to Trump’s 2024 campaign through her political action committee (PAC), making her the single largest donor to his re-election effort. Her support has been tied to her staunch pro-Israel stance, including advocating for the annexation of the occupied West Bank and pushing for U.S. recognition of Israeli sovereignty over disputed territories."
https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/miria...king-trump
That's an excellent argument in favor of campaign finance reform, but not such a good argument for the existence of a "ZOG" in America. A quick brush-up on the old White Supremacist literature - maybe the "Turner Diaries" or something like that - might provide a better argument in that regard.
.
My argument was sound, just because you won't accept it as fact well that's the way the cookie crumbles.
I didn't accept it as "fact" when it was the White Supremacists pushing it back in the day, so I cannot, in any degree of fairness, accept the same argument as "fact" now that someone else has dusted it off and is promoting it.
"Fact" does not depend on political, racial, or cultural leaning. It stands alone, independent of those factors. "Fact" just is. It exists without a need for any spin.
.
“Trouble rather the tiger in his lair than the sage among his books. For to you kingdoms and their armies are things mighty and enduring, but to him they are but toys of the moment, to be overturned with the flick of a finger.”
― Gordon R. Dickson, Tactics of Mistake
― Gordon R. Dickson, Tactics of Mistake