(Yesterday, 02:19 PM)quintessentone Wrote:(Yesterday, 02:18 PM)OmegaLogos Wrote:(Yesterday, 02:11 PM)quintessentone Wrote:(Yesterday, 01:59 PM)YesItsMe Wrote: Israel intelligence says the new Supreme Leader of Iran is in a 'low condition to function'.
His injuries must be severe.
https://www.foxnews.com/live-news/us-ira...t-march-15
It was reported on one of the independent news podcasts I watch that the previous leader planned the succession order in case of his demise. Another will always step up, ready to implement their defensive strategies that they have been planning for the last 20 years.
Explanation: And that is just fine ... let us let them do so, so long as they join our side and then they wont be bombed back into the stone age and can implement their/our defensive strategies ok.
Personal Disclosure: Nobody is saying the former Iran [Now known as Persia, because we forced them to rebrand ... The Former Nation of Iran, MUST REBRAND! Suggest new names for it here! ] should not have any leadership ... but what people are saying is that leadership should be good friends and allies with the western sphere of geopolitics!
Don't you agree?
Which people are saying that?
Iran didn't bomb any of its neighbors, Israel does that.
Rules for thee, but not for me?
Explanation: I, for one, am saying that ok!
Personal Disclosure: You didn't directly answer my question and so I will reiterate it again more broadly!
Do you agree that Persia should join the Western sphere of geopolitics? Yes or no? And however you answer that question, please qualify why you hold that position eh!
