Looks like the war with Iran is cooking off

[Ninurta]

The problem is zionist in israel are heretical indoctrinated fake ideology that are suicidal ,acting like being is killing spree is normal state ....it is not.

Israel attacks central Beirut in escalation of deadly assault on Lebanon

They are out of their freaking minds , a danger to themselves , and also everyone else . They can be jews in other countries, America etc...Israelis can practice judaism many places.

They created monster , it`s just escalation after escalation with no end .

Ideally they would live in the current Israel yes and live happy life. But they turned to zionism and it`s not then all compatible with all other people in the ME and creates chronic problems that start also accumulate .

It`s not just Judaism ....they twisted it and use it`s name to justify all doings.

We are now near WW3 because the not compatible ideology . They need to start  looking mirror and  acting mature.

Everyone there need to start  looking mirror and  acting mature, hamas , Iran ...

So... because Jews can be Jewish anywhere, they don't deserve a place to call home, that they can't be kicked out of? Is that the logic we're working with here, or am I missing something?

Using that logic, Americans can be Americans anywhere... so should we just dissolve the nation here, maybe give it to the Mexicans because the US has treated the cartels so poorly?

There is a sizeable knot of Germans in Brazil and Argentina. They don't need Germany to be Germans, so can we just give Germany to the Russians or Poland then?

The French don't really need France - they can be French anywhere. We could give France to the Russians, too.

Somalis don't need Somalia to be Somalian - we could just move all of them to Minneapolis, where they can continue being Somalian on someone else's dime, and give Somalia to Egypt.

Finns don't need Finland to be Finnish. There's already a lot of them in Minnesota and Wisconsin. So can we just move the rest of them there, and give Finland to the Russians too? That's the logic I'm hearing here.

I would add in that Moslems can be Moslem anywhere, so we could just move them all to the UK and make the UK a Moslem nation, and dissolve the Middle East, but that's a little to uncomfortably close to what is actually happening.

Regarding the Israeli "escalations", why do we suppose they are "escalating"? In the example given, did they "escalate" just because it was a Thursday, and that's what you do on Thursdays - bomb Beirut? Even al-Jazeera, an Arab mouthpiece, acknowledged the reason for the "escalation" in that very article - it was because Hezbollah rocket attacked Israel first, on 2 March. Al-Jazeera - again, an Arab mouthpiece, so not exactly unbiased - CHOSE to call it an "escalation". Others might refer to it as a retaliation, or possibly a preventive measure. "Escalation" was the choice of wording for al-Jazeera, because it's pre-loaded with negative ramifications on Israel. Other folks might see it in a slightly more balanced manner, and call it something else.

Regarding the nukes, we've already been over that, so I won't rehash it all again here. You're afraid of them, I'm not, and neither of those viewpoints is likely to change. I also realize the vanishingly slim potential for them to be used in this conflict... assuming we do not allow Iran to get their hands on them. If that happens, all bets are off, but as for the currently (already) nuclearly armed nations, they have exercised remarkable restraint in their use for over 80 years now, and I don't see that changing any time soon. We have, in the past 80 years of nuclear armaments, been much, MUCH closer to a nuclear exchange than this, yet it has not happened. So color me skeptical on the threat of nuclear annihilation over Iran. It's just not a necessary measure to revoke the Iranian Cleric's birth certificates, so why would anyone risk it in the real world?

.