Uncertainty:
Well I won't be commenting on Godel's works as I question his mental state and him having to create a new numbering system, namely Godel's numbering, which was proven to be not practical for every day mathematics, makes me question whether or not the language of mathematics is the Holy Grail to finding some truths.
Having said that, I do think we have completeness in our understanding, mathematics and physics but only for our immediate observational universe, which isn't too much. Go further out into the expansiveness and the numbers/reality do not jive. Is this the forever uncertainty that humanity will always have to experience? The certainty here is that it will always lead to instability and controversy for those seeking certainty.
Do we not know what we don't know because we don't know, or will never know, the right questions to ask?
Photons from our bodies are being released into objects, people/planet life and the atmosphere to travel, at light speed, the infinite universe. I am uncertain if those photons keep our memories and experiences and wherever or whatever they end up merging with, will that part of us be a re-emergent us? Is this the spirit energy?
I will resign myself to exploring spirit energy using great and/or insightful thinkers' theories to mull around the possibilities, but ultimately I will believe in my heart, mind and soul what feels and seems most logical to be the truth for me. I will not use my third eye to find the answers because I don't know what I am looking for, which, IgnorantGod, can indeed be anxiety-provoking.
The transitory aspect fits right in with and following uncertainty of the whole, but certainty within some of our immediate proven realities exists now, while we continue to explore and learn.
The actuality aspects also fits right in with proven science within our miniscule place in the cosmos. Our observations/realities are constant here on planet Earth, we can measure and explain what we are observing, except for that spooky action at a distance. Keywords: at a distance, as I touched upon earlier in this post.
I also believe some people's actuality or truths are their specific observations, take the case of multiple witnesses witnessing the same event. No two witness testimonies will be the same as no two people's brains/memories work the same due to many outside factors that are happening at the time of witnessing the event. Take that further, then discussing the event among themselves is more likely than not to form memory contamination.
Actuality needs exact/consistent measurements/observations from properly done experiments. This is where methodology needs to be assessed as to whether it is complete or incomplete. Here again, how can we ask the right questions or plan the right course of finding the true answer if we don't know the right question or path to ask/follow?
Well I won't be commenting on Godel's works as I question his mental state and him having to create a new numbering system, namely Godel's numbering, which was proven to be not practical for every day mathematics, makes me question whether or not the language of mathematics is the Holy Grail to finding some truths.
Having said that, I do think we have completeness in our understanding, mathematics and physics but only for our immediate observational universe, which isn't too much. Go further out into the expansiveness and the numbers/reality do not jive. Is this the forever uncertainty that humanity will always have to experience? The certainty here is that it will always lead to instability and controversy for those seeking certainty.
Do we not know what we don't know because we don't know, or will never know, the right questions to ask?
Photons from our bodies are being released into objects, people/planet life and the atmosphere to travel, at light speed, the infinite universe. I am uncertain if those photons keep our memories and experiences and wherever or whatever they end up merging with, will that part of us be a re-emergent us? Is this the spirit energy?
I will resign myself to exploring spirit energy using great and/or insightful thinkers' theories to mull around the possibilities, but ultimately I will believe in my heart, mind and soul what feels and seems most logical to be the truth for me. I will not use my third eye to find the answers because I don't know what I am looking for, which, IgnorantGod, can indeed be anxiety-provoking.
The transitory aspect fits right in with and following uncertainty of the whole, but certainty within some of our immediate proven realities exists now, while we continue to explore and learn.
The actuality aspects also fits right in with proven science within our miniscule place in the cosmos. Our observations/realities are constant here on planet Earth, we can measure and explain what we are observing, except for that spooky action at a distance. Keywords: at a distance, as I touched upon earlier in this post.
I also believe some people's actuality or truths are their specific observations, take the case of multiple witnesses witnessing the same event. No two witness testimonies will be the same as no two people's brains/memories work the same due to many outside factors that are happening at the time of witnessing the event. Take that further, then discussing the event among themselves is more likely than not to form memory contamination.
Actuality needs exact/consistent measurements/observations from properly done experiments. This is where methodology needs to be assessed as to whether it is complete or incomplete. Here again, how can we ask the right questions or plan the right course of finding the true answer if we don't know the right question or path to ask/follow?
Truth fears no question. Anon