(Yesterday, 12:22 AM)babushka Wrote:(02-28-2026, 11:57 PM)IgnorantGod Wrote:(02-28-2026, 10:31 PM)babushka Wrote: [...]
[...]
[...]
How will you observer what you can't sense? Sense is registering change. [...]
Well, how I 'see' this is a bit different. I think perception is simply the agglomeration of all data collected from every sensory parts of the body which after being processed, is fed back to consciousness. More specifically, I think consciousness is "registering change", and not perception in itself.
It seems to me that consciousness is a 'function', of the order of quality control, and it tends to focus on changes throughout the sequences of data (the seemingly flowing 'present') it is fed from the brain processes on sensory input. Experience is that 'something' that seems 'beyond' the physical interactions inside the brain, and and those outside the body. There's still an 'inexplicable' quality in experience that is not observable, and hardly describable with words (what I referred in the OP as "that which lies in between words").
(02-28-2026, 09:01 PM)babushka Wrote: I'm still stuck on interface at present. Super quickly probing "Uncertainty", entropy , order. Emergent complexity. 'transitory'. 'actuality' at the interface something like that
thinking about finding fractals in noise patterns
[...]
Eric Ouellet in his book "Illumanitions: The UFO Experience as a Parapsychological Event" theorizes about consciousness being of fractal nature. That is, the 'self' is made of smaller parts, and is part of a greater compound. And each 'layer' could somewhat communicate with the other 'layers' through morphic resonance. I think we already discussed that a bit on DI, if I recall correctly.
In any case, it is always fascinating, so may as well elaborate this here!
As far as the apple tree is concerned, there's probably not much difference between a worm and a human...
Et le ver en dit : - Il y a toujours un pépin dans la pomme...