(02-28-2026, 08:25 PM)ANNEE Wrote:(02-28-2026, 07:38 PM)The Crying Bunny Wrote:(02-28-2026, 07:29 PM)ANNEE Wrote: Want — Not Want — Need
For those more knowledgeable in this area than me. My motto: “Speak what you know — ignorance shows the fool”.
QUESTION: is there genuinely a logical need for this aggression? And why?
Help me understand.
Please leave personal emotions and Left/Right politics at the door.
Iran's leadership funded global terrorism.
They were making nukes. Even worse, they were probably making "dirty bombs".
For 47 years, we've tried diplomacy, appeasement, bribes.
Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results is the very definition of insanity.
This is different, it's aggressive.
Islamic fundamentalists look at diplomacy, negotiations as weak.
Thank you.
Not to sound un-America (ancestors from the 1700’s) - but who exactly consists of “we”?
No other country on this rock has dropped an atomic bomb killing more than 150,000 people. So - why do we get to have nuclear capability and others don’t?
Just to be clear I am not anti-aggression. Sometimes it’s needed. I’m just trying to understand the full/complete situation from a non-partisan source.
If you cannot differentiate between the US and Iran under the regime of the Ayatollah, then I've nothing to offer you.
Have a nice day.