US Supreme Court strikes DOWN Trump tarifs 6-3

[putnam6]

Get this

• The post by
  @grey4626
  vehemently criticizes Chief Justice John Roberts for a 2015 stay at the U.S. ambassador's residence in Prague hosted by Norm Eisen, an Obama-era official involved in Trump impeachments, framing it as a conflict of interest under 28 U.S.C. § 455 that demands recusal and impeachment.
  
• Eisen, who served as U.S. Ambassador to the Czech Republic from 2011-2014, publicly acknowledged hosting Roberts for a week to discuss "rule of law initiatives," an event detailed in Eisen's 2018 memoir The Last Palace and resurfaced in 2025 amid scrutiny of judicial ethics.
  
• This old interaction has reignited conservative outrage, tying into broader narratives of "captured judiciary" and recent Supreme Court tensions over Trump-related cases, though no formal ethics violation has been established despite calls for accountability.
  

The Gateway Pundit reposted


TMK
@themagaking

Justice Roberts: 

Obama can force every American to buy health insurance, and hit them with a “tax” if they refuse? 

YES. 

Justice Roberts: 

Biden can force federal workers to take a vaccine, even against personal beliefs, doctor advice, or religious objections? 

YES. 

Justice Roberts: 

Trump can impose reciprocal tariffs to level the playing field and help American workers? 

NO. 

Justice isn’t blind. 
For Roberts, it’s political.

What are saying? You see that you see the truth?

Is it really that ambiguous? 

SCOTUS votes FOR those 2 highly controversional widely intrusive Democratic initiatives, but scuttles Trump's highly controversional widely intrusive tariffs


visits to Prague with liberal bigwig, supports Democratic key landmark legislation, while rejecting Trump's long overdue tariff reforms. Tariff reforms that Trump can easily reintroduce under other previously Congressional/SCOTUS-approved statutes, that are well within his rights as President.

Wasn't gonna mention

ObamaCare cost alone for our business were decidedly more per year than these tariffs seemingly ever will. $6000 plus to participate for a year or eat $3000 a year in individual penalties, IIRC

The COVID mandates decimated our industry and pushed our business to the brink, 5 years later, we are just now able to breathe.

Trump's tariffs did not have the same immediate negative financial effect on our industry sector and our bottom line, and we have a significant positive influx of savings from petrol for 2025 compared to 2024 and 2023.

I know Elon suggests there will be no need to squirrel our money away soon,but old habits are hard to break.