Sir Jim Ratcliffe has expressed sorrow that his wording has upset some easily offended people but his belief remains unchanged , this debate must continue.
Personally I would say it's imperative for people in his position to raise this issue as it effects the very nature of our society and ultimately the survival of our way of life and Country.
ETA
British Barrister Daniel ShenSmith shows using official statistics that what Sir Jim Ratcliffe is correct and that Starmer is a hypocrite calling for Ratcliffe to resign as he himself has said similar.
Quote:In a statement, the founder of the INEOS chemicals group and Manchester United co-owner said: "I am sorry that my choice of language has offended some people in the UK and Europe and caused concern, but it is important to raise the issue of controlled and well-managed immigration that supports economic growth."
"My comments were made while answering questions about UK policy at the European Industry Summit in Antwerp, where I was discussing the importance of economic growth, jobs, skills and manufacturing in the UK.
"My intention was to stress that governments must manage migration alongside investment in skills, industry and jobs so that long-term prosperity is shared by everyone. It is critical that we maintain an open debate on the challenges facing the UK."
https://news.sky.com/story/politics-late...r-12593360
Personally I would say it's imperative for people in his position to raise this issue as it effects the very nature of our society and ultimately the survival of our way of life and Country.
ETA
British Barrister Daniel ShenSmith shows using official statistics that what Sir Jim Ratcliffe is correct and that Starmer is a hypocrite calling for Ratcliffe to resign as he himself has said similar.