The search engines keep repeating the results from old FDA and NOAA studies, along with other old scientific studies.
However, I noticed that there was a concern for tribal fishing along the Canadian coast, but no current Canadian government data I could find easily. Then I got some detailed information from the State of Alaska in the form of a list. The website has the list and a link to a PDF file.
https://dec.alaska.gov/eh/vet/fish-monit...kan-waters
I noticed how the FDA can't detect anything in 2025 and to make a correction here, they had "not detected" for many tests with the rest as "not applicable" for this whole study. This doesn't seem like good data to me.
However, I noticed that there was a concern for tribal fishing along the Canadian coast, but no current Canadian government data I could find easily. Then I got some detailed information from the State of Alaska in the form of a list. The website has the list and a link to a PDF file.
Quote:Great State of Alaska
Division of Environmental Health
Office of the State Veterinarian
Radioisotopes in Fish Caught in Alaska Waters
Fukushima Radiation Concerns
Fish samples collected: 2014-2024
Beginning in 2014, the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, Division of Environmental Health, in collaboration with the Department of Health and the FDA has tested fish samples collected in Alaskan waters for cesium-134, cesium-137 and iodine-131 radioisotopes. The Fish Monitoring Program developed the sampling plan for this project in order to collect relevant species from important fishery areas around the State. All samples tested by the FDA through April 11, 2025 resulted in non-detects.
Starting in 2016, samples have been analyzed in-state at the Environmental Health Laboratory (EHL) using a Portable Gamma Ray Analyzer developed by the FDA and Canberra. The sample is analyzed here at the EHL, and the results are sent to FDA scientists at the Winchester Engineering and Analytical Center for interpretation. This allows for much quicker turnaround time resulting in more timely results. Additionally, if the need arises, this instrument would allow for effective, in-state assessment and monitoring of Cs-134 and Cs-137.
https://dec.alaska.gov/eh/vet/fish-monit...kan-waters
I noticed how the FDA can't detect anything in 2025 and to make a correction here, they had "not detected" for many tests with the rest as "not applicable" for this whole study. This doesn't seem like good data to me.
A trail goes two ways and looks different in each direction - There is no such thing as a timid woodland creature - Whatever does not kill you leaves you a survivor - Jesus is NOT a bad word - MSB