Britain Today

[Ninurta]

The result of a centuries-old tradition or deliberate intrusive behaviour from people responding to cultural weakness?

Grooming gang guilty of raping and abusing girls

'Seven men have been found guilty of sexually exploiting two teenage girls who were repeatedly raped
and assaulted in Rochdale for five years. The gang was convicted of various sexual offences against the
girls between 2001 and 2006.


Mohammed Zahid.

The victims, known as Girl A and Girl B, were groomed from the age of 13 and treated as "sex slaves",
being expected to "have sex with the men whenever and wherever they wanted", the trial heard. Girl A
told the jury she could have been targeted by more than 200 men, while Girl B said social workers had
regarded her as "a prostitute" from the age of 10.

Manchester Minshull Street Crown Court heard that both girls had "deeply troubled home lives" and were
plied with drugs, alcohol and cigarettes and given places to stay by the men, who worked on the town's
market or as taxi drivers. The prosecution said the girls were "children passed around for sex, abused,
degraded and then discarded", adding: "They became sex slaves."

Girl A told the jury she may have been preyed on by hundreds of men as her phone number was swapped,
but said "there was that many it was hard to keep count". She told local children's services in 2004 that
she was "hanging around" with groups of older men, drinking and taking cannabis, the court heard.

Girl B, who was living in a children's home when she came into contact with the men on the market,
said police and social workers knew what was going on but "weren't concerned enough to do anything
about it". "It was in my file, when I looked it up. I read it," the woman, now aged in her 30s, told the
court. "I was picked up by the police for loitering and prostituting from the age of 10."


(Top Row L-R) Mohammed Shahzad, Mushtaq Ahmed and Kasir Bashir.
(Bottom Row L-R) Nisar Hussain, Roheez Khan and Naheem Akram.
...

It's true this is an old Islamic practice which had been employed against conquered peoples since the days of Mohammed's Wars. However, if folks are looking at it as an intra-cultural phenomena, they are missing the point  of it's use in extra-cultural affairs.

It was used by Mohammed's gangs against every single people they conquered, as proof that they were the conquerors.

The purpose of it is to demonstrate Muslim dominance over a conquered people. The rationale is that the men of a conquered people will not protect or defend the weakest and most vulnerable among them - their women and children. I will note here that the victims in these cases check both of those boxes, and should therefore be doubly protected and defended, yet they were not.

Only a truly conquered population will allow such shenanigans to proceed without answer.

It is done primarily to demonstrate that British men, in general - although there are exceptions -  are well and truly conquered already.

It is a klaxon call that says "the waters here are fine and safe - send in the rest of the troops. Bring their families - they have nothing more to fear from any warriors defending this land".

The 5 year sentences for such outrages are a mere slap on the wrist, and every Arab knows it. The fact that it took 15 to 20 years to get even that tiny slap on the wrist signals that there is no resolve in Britain any more. If these men manage to survive a 5 year stint in British prison, that will be even more evidence that the testosterone levels in Britain are on the decline. If even hardened criminals fear to retaliate, then Britain is lost to Islam already.

.