(05-22-2025, 07:49 PM)gortex Wrote: I agree , I think we passed that point when he started locking up people for writing words.
My theory is his plan , or given mission , is to bring the UK to its knees so we need IMF bailouts , we will then rejoin the EU because it's "best for the Country" , Kier will only last one term but that was probably in the plan hence the speed of his actions.
If he lasts that entire term, then something is seriously wrong.
I don't know if recall elections are possible in the UK, but if they are, that is what needs to happen, post-haste. Get that poser out of there as rapidly as possible to minimize the damage he can do, and reverse as much of it as is possible. Leaving him in place is not going to accomplish that, it's only going to make things worse.
Invalidate all actions he has taken in office as illegitimate abuses of power.
When a politician is so extreme that even large segments of his own party decry him, then the iron is hot enough to strike. That is why Kamala Harris fared as poorly as she did in the most recent US elections - she was so extreme that even large parts of her own party said "whoa - are we really ready for THIS kind of radicalism?"
The US should have also had a recall election under Biden, but of course that never happened. The natural human proclivity is to endure so long as endurance is possible, hoping for a better future. However, when people can see that better future actively being dismantled in the present, then drastic measures are called for to halt it.
A recall election, if possible, is the fist step in that action. Barring that, there should at least be a vote of "no confidence" to hamstring the opposition, in my opinion.
When a man proclaims allegiance to Davos over and above his own constituency, the handwriting is on the wall.
In all honesty, Trump is not helping matters by continuing to work with the UK government. he ought to halt all cooperation with the UK that is possible to halt, and institute no new cooperation, until such time as the UK government returns to it's responsibility to it's constituency. Yes, that would be harsh, and in the short term probably painful, but in the long term it would be doing it's part to save the UK.
A cancer cannot be removed without painful measures - surgery, chemo, radiation, or all of the above. Komrade Starmer is, to all intents and purposes, a cancer feeding on Britain.
.