As an example of Method no.2, I think, observe the growing Google practice of adding an AI-inspired "summary" to the top of searches, as if to say "This is the right answer, you don't need to look any further." Perhaps, at a later stage, we won't be shown anything else, and perhaps it will be forbidden, even blasphemous, to challenge what AI tells us.
I've experienced the fallibility of these summaries. I did a search on one of my own books, to copy a link to post somewhere, and got presented with a "summary" which mixed it up with a completely different book. My title, another author's name, my description (mostly), wrong genre. I did a feedback complaint, of course.
.https://www.reddit.com/r/AskAnotherChris..._deceiver/ I'veI've had direct experience of the fallibility. I did a search on one of my own books, because I wanted to copy a link to post somewhere, and got presented with a "summary" which mixed it up with an altogether different book. My title, different author's name, my description (mostly), wrong genre. I did a feedback complaint, of course. had direct experience of the fallibility. I did a search on one of my own books, because I wanted to copy a link to post somewhere, and got presented with a "summary" which mixed it up with an altogether different book. My title, different author's name, my description (mostly), wrong genre. I did a feedback complaint, of course.
Irr[size=1]Yes, and I worry about th[size=1]I've had direct experience of the fallibility. I did a search on one of my own books, because I wanted to copy a link to post somewhere, and got presented with a "summary" which mixed it up with an altogether different book. My title, different author's name, my description (mostly), wrong genre. I did a feedback complaint, of course.e long term possibility that the AI verdict will become the "official" view which nobody is allowed to challenge.[/size]
I've had direct experience of the fallibility. I did a search on one of my own books, because I wanted to copy a link to post somewhere, and got presented with a "summary" which mixed it up with an altogether different book. My title, different author's name, my description (mostly), wrong genre. I did a feedback complaint, of course.
y about the long terYes, and I worry about the long term possibility that the AI verdict will become the "official" view which nobody is allowed to challenge.
I've had direct experience of the fallibility. I did a search on one of my own books, because I wanted to copy a link to post somewhere, and got presented with a "summary" which mixed it up with an altogether different book. My title, different author's name, my description (mostly), wrong genre. I did a feedback rse.
m possibility that the AI verdict will become the "official" view which nobody is allowed to challenge.[/size]
I've had direct experience of the fallibility. I did a search on one of my own books, because I wanted to copy a link to post somewhere, and got presented with a "summary" which mixed it up with an altogether different book. My title, different author's name, my description (mostly), wrong genre. I did a feedback complaint, of course.
Yes, and I worry about the long term possibility that the AI verdict will become the "official" view which nobody is allowed to challenge.
I've had direct experience of the fallibility. I did a search on one of my own books, because I wanted to copy a link to post somewhere, and got presented with a "summary" which mixed it up with an altogether different book. My title, different author's name, my description (mostly), wrong genre. I did a feedback complaint, of course.
I've experienced the fallibility of these summaries. I did a search on one of my own books, to copy a link to post somewhere, and got presented with a "summary" which mixed it up with a completely different book. My title, another author's name, my description (mostly), wrong genre. I did a feedback complaint, of course.
.https://www.reddit.com/r/AskAnotherChris..._deceiver/ I'veI've had direct experience of the fallibility. I did a search on one of my own books, because I wanted to copy a link to post somewhere, and got presented with a "summary" which mixed it up with an altogether different book. My title, different author's name, my description (mostly), wrong genre. I did a feedback complaint, of course. had direct experience of the fallibility. I did a search on one of my own books, because I wanted to copy a link to post somewhere, and got presented with a "summary" which mixed it up with an altogether different book. My title, different author's name, my description (mostly), wrong genre. I did a feedback complaint, of course.
Irr[size=1]Yes, and I worry about th[size=1]I've had direct experience of the fallibility. I did a search on one of my own books, because I wanted to copy a link to post somewhere, and got presented with a "summary" which mixed it up with an altogether different book. My title, different author's name, my description (mostly), wrong genre. I did a feedback complaint, of course.e long term possibility that the AI verdict will become the "official" view which nobody is allowed to challenge.[/size]
I've had direct experience of the fallibility. I did a search on one of my own books, because I wanted to copy a link to post somewhere, and got presented with a "summary" which mixed it up with an altogether different book. My title, different author's name, my description (mostly), wrong genre. I did a feedback complaint, of course.
y about the long terYes, and I worry about the long term possibility that the AI verdict will become the "official" view which nobody is allowed to challenge.
I've had direct experience of the fallibility. I did a search on one of my own books, because I wanted to copy a link to post somewhere, and got presented with a "summary" which mixed it up with an altogether different book. My title, different author's name, my description (mostly), wrong genre. I did a feedback rse.
m possibility that the AI verdict will become the "official" view which nobody is allowed to challenge.[/size]
I've had direct experience of the fallibility. I did a search on one of my own books, because I wanted to copy a link to post somewhere, and got presented with a "summary" which mixed it up with an altogether different book. My title, different author's name, my description (mostly), wrong genre. I did a feedback complaint, of course.
Yes, and I worry about the long term possibility that the AI verdict will become the "official" view which nobody is allowed to challenge.
I've had direct experience of the fallibility. I did a search on one of my own books, because I wanted to copy a link to post somewhere, and got presented with a "summary" which mixed it up with an altogether different book. My title, different author's name, my description (mostly), wrong genre. I did a feedback complaint, of course.