(06-13-2024, 03:22 PM)NightskyeB4Dawn Wrote:I fully support your 1st and 2nd, but here in Australia we have neiter the 1st or 2nd, and I really think Australians are at a loss for not having a 1st or 2nd.(06-13-2024, 02:49 PM)BeTheGoddess Wrote:(06-13-2024, 01:36 PM)NightskyeB4Dawn Wrote:(06-13-2024, 08:52 AM)Bally002 Wrote:(06-13-2024, 08:01 AM)BIAD Wrote:I like Kate. She would make a good steadfast Queen. Hope is alright with her health.(06-13-2024, 07:53 AM)BeTheGoddess Wrote: ...The RF need better PR folk.
I would normally agree, except it seems getting a message out to the public has drastically changed
over the last few years and now it's a common trait to quote 'any publicity is good publicity!'
You've just got to look at Harry's public relations to see that!
MS?
Kind regards,
Bally)
I don't follow the Royal family, and outside of being familiar with the names, I don't know much about them.
I don't think they are much different from any other well known person, at the mercy of TPTB, and to be used whichever way that best benefits those in control. I think most of them are pawns in the game, just like the rest of us.
Most other well known families dont have an entire armed forces on side, control of the Bankk of England and weekly meetings with the PM, but yeah otherwise they are just like the Kennedy's or Kuntashians.
[/quote
I have little interest in the Royal family, and I admit that I am not British, so I can't speak about what they actually do for the British people, or how much control they have over them. And I may be wrong but I think they are more figureheads and PR agents.
It seems Americans gets the luck of the draw. Notice I said draw, not vote.
And the British get the luck of birth.
In both cases I believe our governments are outside the control of the people.
I could be wrong.
but we try our best...
I'm stil sussing out the board and I hope bolding what I'm replying to as being rude, just struck me.
I shot the deputy.