I'm not sure that I put much stock in the "trans" label hung on him - it says he's both "trans" AND "non-binary". How in the hell can one person be BOTH? What would they be transitioning FROM or TO if they can't declare a simple major? That's not "transition", that's "indecision".
It seems fairly simple to me, but I'm a simple man with a simple mind. One has either an innie or an outie. If one has an innie, then they are "female", and if they have an outie, they are male. If one used to have one of those, but now has the other, they may be described as "trans", but more often as what they are at the moment. Why over-complicate tings?
Now it is surprising that the Justice Department has finally charged an ANTIFA, which ought to supply a bit of hope, but they've fallen short of proper charges, which is still a cause for concern. The proper charge should be "terrorism" or "terroristic threats". The crime fits the desfinition of terrorism, which is "use or threat of violence in furtherance of political goals". The bomb supplies the use of violence, and the political stickers confirm the intended goals. So, they are STILL treating him with kid gloves, unlike the parents charged with "terrorism" for simply speaking their minds at school board meetings.
Also of concern is the fact that no one can still bring themselves to call a spade a spade with ANTIFA, and still insist that it's "not an organization" when it clearly IS one. That was specified in at least two of the articles. You cannot fight an enemy that you can't even define, you can't fight one that you deny the existence of. In that regard, both the MSM and the current regime are giving aid and comfort to the enemy.
Nothing new there!
.
It seems fairly simple to me, but I'm a simple man with a simple mind. One has either an innie or an outie. If one has an innie, then they are "female", and if they have an outie, they are male. If one used to have one of those, but now has the other, they may be described as "trans", but more often as what they are at the moment. Why over-complicate tings?
Now it is surprising that the Justice Department has finally charged an ANTIFA, which ought to supply a bit of hope, but they've fallen short of proper charges, which is still a cause for concern. The proper charge should be "terrorism" or "terroristic threats". The crime fits the desfinition of terrorism, which is "use or threat of violence in furtherance of political goals". The bomb supplies the use of violence, and the political stickers confirm the intended goals. So, they are STILL treating him with kid gloves, unlike the parents charged with "terrorism" for simply speaking their minds at school board meetings.
Also of concern is the fact that no one can still bring themselves to call a spade a spade with ANTIFA, and still insist that it's "not an organization" when it clearly IS one. That was specified in at least two of the articles. You cannot fight an enemy that you can't even define, you can't fight one that you deny the existence of. In that regard, both the MSM and the current regime are giving aid and comfort to the enemy.
Nothing new there!
.