I just don't see what all the ooh-hah is all about -except to appreciate the concern that the people
who steer the Public Relations of the Royal Family would have if a such a photograph didn't originate
from one of their own outlets.
"...PA Media, the UK's biggest news agency - through which the Royal Family regularly releases its
official information, including to the BBC - said it had not killed the picture on its service..."
BBC:
If this is a covert swipe at AI abilities that could cost jobs in the legacy media business, I can see
why such controversy would end-up on the front pages, but as far as fingers and sleeves being
'manipulated', it's been common practice in their circles for years! Fashion magazines would back
me up on this!
If it's not AI generated, then someone the people in the photograph felt comfortable with, took the
shot and I'll wager they had permission from someone in the Royal PR system.
who steer the Public Relations of the Royal Family would have if a such a photograph didn't originate
from one of their own outlets.
"...PA Media, the UK's biggest news agency - through which the Royal Family regularly releases its
official information, including to the BBC - said it had not killed the picture on its service..."
BBC:
If this is a covert swipe at AI abilities that could cost jobs in the legacy media business, I can see
why such controversy would end-up on the front pages, but as far as fingers and sleeves being
'manipulated', it's been common practice in their circles for years! Fashion magazines would back
me up on this!
If it's not AI generated, then someone the people in the photograph felt comfortable with, took the
shot and I'll wager they had permission from someone in the Royal PR system.

Read The TV Guide, yer' don't need a TV.