First look INSIDE a Black Hole! - Pictor A

[A51Watcher2]

This is a very interesting image of the Black Hole named Pictor A.



There it is in the center busily gobbling up the 2 stars circling around it.

What is unique about it is the viewing angle is from the top down which as far as we know is - it is the only time such an image has been taken from that angle.

So my team processed it and were quite surprised with the results -



It reminds me of science class in school where they put a sheet of paper over a magnet and poured iron filings over it.

The magnetic forces of this thing obviously must be tremendous!

[Ninurta]

Can you give us some idea of what it is we are looking at in the processed image? How does it relate to the raw image? How do we know we are looking at magnetic field lines as opposed to, say for instance, gravity field lines? I ask because the Lagrange points seem to be present in the image - if I'm looking at it correctly, that is.


.

[A51Watcher2]

Can you give us some idea of what it is we are looking at in the processed image? How does it relate to the raw image? How do we know we are looking at magnetic field lines as opposed to, say for instance, gravity field lines? I ask because the Lagrange points seem to be present in the image - if I'm looking at it correctly, that is.


.

Well the only reason I said magnetic was because that's what they reminded me of because of science class. They could well be gravity lines or a combination of both. Frankly we have no idea which is correct.
It relates to the raw image by the fact that we zoomed in on the black hole (the bright spot in the center).

 A friend of mine who I showed the image to said "I don't know whether to study it more closely or to look away and never look at it again." LOL
He was kinda spooked by it.
Further images not zoomed in so close show debris of the star systems orbiting it being shredded coming in and being swallowed -

 

Einstein's theories were converted to math equations by a fellow scientist presupposed there was only one event horizon.

Contemporaries of this mathematician, a pair of brothers, found different results and proposed 2 event horizons and further processing by our team appears to show they were right.

 
The neat thing about having 2 event horizons theoretically means you could enter through one horizon and exit through the other, thereby traversing a black hole to god knows where.

[Ninurta]

I don't know what process you used to enhance the images, and I won't ask because I gather that some of your processes are proprietary, but if you analyze those processes, it may be possible to determine what material or energy wavelength is being highlighted to show up as the banding or contours, and from that, after figuring the material or wavelength causing the banding, it should be possible to determine what process or energy is at work, based on the material it is concentrating in the bands, shouldn't it?


.

[A51Watcher2]

I don't know what process you used to enhance the images, and I won't ask because I gather that some of your processes are proprietary, but if you analyze those processes, it may be possible to determine what material or energy wavelength is being highlighted to show up as the banding or contours, and from that, after figuring the material or wavelength causing the banding, it should be possible to determine what process or energy is at work, based on the material it is concentrating in the bands, shouldn't it?


.

Interesting, I will ask the team.

One caveat the brothers mentioned about traversing the black hole would be - it would take a TREMENDOUS amount of voltage to do so.

Well Lazar's sports model with it's anti matter reactor certainly qualifies as a candidate for that!

[A51Watcher2]

I don't know what process you used to enhance the images, and I won't ask because I gather that some of your processes are proprietary, but if you analyze those processes, it may be possible to determine what material or energy wavelength is being highlighted to show up as the banding or contours, and from that, after figuring the material or wavelength causing the banding, it should be possible to determine what process or energy is at work, based on the material it is concentrating in the bands, shouldn't it?

Okay I have spoken with the team.

Yes much of the software we use is NDA military grade.

So while we cannot reveal the name of the software, we are allowed to describe it's purpose and we always do so before each phase is displayed.

The answer is none of us are scientists or astrophysicists so we do not know.

The process used on these images do not provide an answer either. 

The software used on the black hole is called the Deuem shades of black.

'Professor' Deuem heads up the Asian division of the team and this software is not NDA

I described this process to BIAD several months ago since he was the only imaging specialist I knew here at the time.

It is a scientific process meaning that other people can reproduce the results the of this for themselves and have done so.

It is very simple - there are shades of black just like there are shades of grey.

In the digital world all primary colors are divided into 256 shades.

So shade 256 of black is the darkest black you can get.

Here is an image made with mostly all pixels of shade 256 of black with some text written in shade 255 -




Now I opened that image in a paint program and wrote some text on it in black shade 255 instead of 256, and see if you can read the text. You cannot because they are invisible (or hidden) to the human eye and it remains to look like a total black image. 

If I wrote some more text in black shade 254 it would still remain hidden from the human eye. 253, 252 etc. all remain hidden until quite a few numbers down from that.

So one way to reveal hidden pixels in an image is to use the color replacer function in your photo or paint program.Just drag your mouse across an image and it will display the digital value of the pixel you are on.

Let's say you have an image that is of a dark sky at night with a white dot in the sky. As you drag your mouse across it you will see most values are 256 but as you approach the white area you begin to notice some 255s and 254s. So you place your mouse over a 255 pixel and tell your replacer function to replace all 255 pixels in this image to red, then do the same for all the 254s. Then continue to replace all hidden pixels in the image with a bright color to alert us there is a hidden pixel in this location. 
 
Now then doing this manually can be time consuming, so Deuem created a program that does this automatically.

He discovered interesting results from photos of those huge parking lot lights and high voltage equipment. He tried it on UFO photos for several years with no results until he met me on a forum where I was posting clips of my footage taken at Area 51.

He came racing back to the forum and PM'd me and yelled "HOLY SHIT MAN YOU GOT A REAL UFO THERE"

I just laffed and said yeah I know I was there.

He showed me the results but I didn't really understand what I was seeing.

To me it just looked like some kind of Psychedelic mish mash of colors.

He then explained the shades of black process to me and I began to understand what we were seeing.

All of the images above were created with the Deuem process.


I will give you a few examples of Deuem processing on my A51 footage -

This was taken on Mailbox road during the Alien craft test flights when a Cammo dude came driving by me and spotted me filming the craft.

For a moment one of the craft became visible in the frame so we froze the frame and zoomed in, and applied the Deuem process. This is the first one he ever did and was so freaked out about because his software had never done anything like this before -



and here are some further examples examples of the Deuem process on single frames of my footage -


 










So in studying these images, the first question that seemed easiest to answer was what are those red cloud thingy's under the craft.

[F2d5thCav]

A51--

Are you guys watching Betelgeuse ?

It is apparently a supernova candidate, probably blew a long time ago but the radiation hasn't yet reached us.

Another question, regarding what you last posted.

What make the swirly stuff above the "red cloud" a craft of some kind ?

Cheers

[A51Watcher2]

A51--

Are you guys watching Betelgeuse ?

It is apparently a supernova candidate, probably blew a long time ago but the radiation hasn't yet reached us.

Another question, regarding what you last posted.

What make the swirly stuff above the "red cloud" a craft of some kind ?

Cheers

Well as you can see in the video the craft in the original image is a white dot in the sky. 

After processing we see all the colors which represent hidden pixels in the image.

All of the images I posted were originally a white dot in the sky.

Notice the red clouds under the craft appear to have a fluid motion and are constantly moving.

I give anyone 3 guesses what these red clouds must represent and the first 2 don'tt count.

Considering that these craft pulse every 12ms (revealed by John Lear) and our puny videocams only record at 30 fps we certainly are not seeing all the action.

[Ninurta]

So if I understand it correctly, the algorithm replaced color intensity with a different RGB color to highlight the intensity of that pixel by swapping the color contained in it to a different hue, and goes on to change the intensity of that hue to create the banding in a sort of "false color" enhancement? And then it goes on to evaluate the entire image, every pixel in the image to create a false color image that shows intensity variance in the overall image?

It seems to increase contrast by removing steps in the color depth to create a more abrupt transition between colors, like reducing 32 bit to 16 bit, or 16 bit to 8 bit, and that is what is causing the "banding" effect.

So it appears the banding represents different intensities of light rather than different wavelengths, and that would be of no value in identifying various substances or elements.

I downloaded the "black" image to local and ran it through my own stuff, mostly just a contrast enhancement, and read the words "This is what see" in the upper left quadrant of the image:

Before:



After:



ETA: If there is a "pulse" every 12 ms, then that is 83 1/3 pulses per second, so you would need a frame rate of around 100 fps to catch them all, like in a high-speed camera, one of those they use to catch insect or hummingbird wing beats or bullets in flight. Using a camera like that, and stepping through the enhanced frames, you should be able to detect pulses increasing and decreasing.

.

[Ninurta]

These images are Pictor A in various wavelengths:

X-ray:



Radio:



Composite of both:



Source - Chandra X-Ray Observatory, Harvard

.

[A51Watcher2]

So if I understand it correctly, the algorithm replaced color intensity with a different RGB color to highlight the intensity of that pixel by swapping the color contained in it to a different hue, and goes on to change the intensity of that hue to create the banding in a sort of "false color" enhancement? And then it goes on to evaluate the entire image, every pixel in the image to create a false color image that shows intensity variance in the overall image?

It seems to increase contrast by removing steps in the color depth to create a more abrupt transition between colors, like reducing 32 bit to 16 bit, or 16 bit to 8 bit, and that is what is causing the "banding" effect.

So it appears the banding represents different intensities of light rather than different wavelengths, and that would be of no value in identifying various substances or elements.

I downloaded the "black" image to local and ran it through my own stuff, mostly just a contrast enhancement, and read the words "This is what see" in the upper left quadrant of the image:

Before:



After:



ETA: If there is a "pulse" every 12 ms, then that is 83 1/3 pulses per second, so you would need a frame rate of around 100 fps to catch them all, like in a high-speed camera, one of those they use to catch insect or hummingbird wing beats or bullets in flight. Using a camera like that, and stepping through the enhanced frames, you should be able to detect pulses increasing and decreasing.

.

Yes you have the idea now. 

If you download the video I took on mailbox road to local, then process the image of the white dot in the sky you will get the same result we did.

[A51Watcher2]

First off, thanks Ninurta for adding to the peer review of this process. 

If others can reproduce one's results then it is considered scientifically valid.

Secondly, F2d5thCav perhaps I misunderstood your question. 

If you were asking about the fine lines of circles in the center shown in the white area of the photo, those relate to circles Deuem first found in images of high voltage devices. just a few circles with fat lines. Higher voltage devices more circles with thinner lines.

He had NEVER seen so many circles with very thin lines as he did on the craft at A51! He estimated the voltage shown in the images was tremendous!

The red thingy's under the craft never appeared in any other photos of high voltage objects.

Now, as to the red thingy's under the craft, the team all agreed that since we knew that the craft uses amplified micro gravity for propulsion, and most of the red lines are concentrated under the craft, we started calling them gravity clouds, for support and movement.

We have further Deuem images to support that theory.

Well we suspect the clouds are not gravity itself, they are just showing the EFFECTS of gravity, not actually gravity itself.


More on that later if anyone is interested.

[A51Watcher2]

Ya know @Ninurta, your suggestion of examining the process has been working around in the back of my head ever since you mentioned it.

As per usual my brain works on problems in my sleep and last night I woke up with a solution. 

While it's true that the process gives us no measurable numbers to work with as far as whether we are seeing magnetism or gravity (or a combination of both), it DOES give a measurable process for other things.

AS I mentioned, Deuem ran some early test runs on photos of high voltage sodium parking lot lamps and power station transformers.

The lamps had fewer rings around the center and the lines were fatter. The high voltage transformers had more rings and the lines were thinner.

So we could get photos of objects with known voltages and compare the number of rings as the voltage gets higher, does it do so exponentially or a linear fashion?

This also give us an estimation of the voltage on the outside of the craft.

Thanks again for the great question!

[Ninurta]

First off, thanks Ninurta for adding to the peer review of this process. 

If others can reproduce one's results then it is considered scientifically valid.

Glad to add.

The red thingy's under the craft never appeared in any other photos of high voltage objects.

Now, as to the red thingy's under the craft, the team all agreed that since we knew that the craft uses amplified micro gravity for propulsion, and most of the red lines are concentrated under the craft, we started calling them gravity clouds, for support and movement.

We have further Deuem images to support that theory.

Well we suspect the clouds are not gravity itself, they are just showing the EFFECTS of gravity, not actually gravity itself.


More on that later if anyone is interested.

The "red thingies" or red area under the object look to me to be something akin to atmospheric ionization. Not electricity itself, but a result of electrical discharges, or some other sort of energetic discharge. Since it is concentrated in one area, it would appear that something in that area is what is causing the disturbance, not necessarily something of an electrical nature, but surely some sort of energetic discharge.

.

[Ninurta]

Ya know @Ninurta, your suggestion of examining the process has been working around in the back of my head ever since you mentioned it.

As per usual my brain works on problems in my sleep and last night I woke up with a solution. 

While it's true that the process gives us no measurable numbers to work with as far as whether we are seeing magnetism or gravity (or a combination of both), it DOES give a measurable process for other things.

AS I mentioned, Deuem ran some early test runs on photos of high voltage sodium parking lot lamps and power station transformers.

The lamps had fewer rings around the center and the lines were fatter. The high voltage transformers had more rings and the lines were thinner.

So we could get photos of objects with known voltages and compare the number of rings as the voltage gets higher, does it do so exponentially or a linear fashion?

This also give us an estimation of the voltage on the outside of the craft.

Thanks again for the great question!

Not necessarily voltage. Voltage, electricity, has it's niche at the atomic level, due to the exchange of electrons between atoms as the current (amperage) flows. But, at the subatomic level, other energies come into play. You start getting into the weak force, the strong force, and gravitational forces at that level - among God only knows what other undiscovered as yet forces may be at play - and there is no telling what sort of signature such forces may show at the macro level as they aggregate.

Limiting the search to voltage may handicap the search.

There are also other forces to consider - attractive forces, ex: gravity, or repulsive forces ex: centripetal forces. Properly focused, both attractive and repulsive forces would affect propulsion. For example, an attractive force generated on one side of an object coupled with a repulsive force on the other would tend to increase the acceleration in the direction of the attractive force and away from the direction of the repulsive force.

ETA: Thee is also the consideration that some other force would need to be generated within a finite field to counteract gravitational forces in great accelerations away from the gravitational source, in order to avoid turning any potential occupants into a strawberry-colored stain on the inner walls of the object. An acceleration in excess of gravitational acceleration, and opposite it, would tend to mush up biological systems within the object without some counteracting force - but that force would have to be contained in a finite field or "bubble" in order to avoid interfering with the propulsive forces.

.

[A51Watcher2]

Ya know @Ninurta, your suggestion of examining the process has been working around in the back of my head ever since you mentioned it.

As per usual my brain works on problems in my sleep and last night I woke up with a solution. 

While it's true that the process gives us no measurable numbers to work with as far as whether we are seeing magnetism or gravity (or a combination of both), it DOES give a measurable process for other things.

AS I mentioned, Deuem ran some early test runs on photos of high voltage sodium parking lot lamps and power station transformers.

The lamps had fewer rings around the center and the lines were fatter. The high voltage transformers had more rings and the lines were thinner.

So we could get photos of objects with known voltages and compare the number of rings as the voltage gets higher, does it do so exponentially or a linear fashion?

This also give us an estimation of the voltage on the outside of the craft.

Thanks again for the great question!

Not necessarily voltage. Voltage, electricity, has it's niche at the atomic level, due to the exchange of electrons between atoms as the current (amperage) flows. But, at the subatomic level, other energies come into play. You start getting into the weak force, the strong force, and gravitational forces at that level - among God only knows what other undiscovered as yet forces may be at play - and there is no telling what sort of signature such forces may show at the macro level as they aggregate.

Limiting the search to voltage may handicap the search.

There are also other forces to consider - attractive forces, ex: gravity, or repulsive forces ex: centripetal forces. Properly focused, both attractive and repulsive forces would affect propulsion. For example, an attractive force generated on one side of an object coupled with a repulsive force on the other would tend to increase the acceleration in the direction of the attractive force and away from the direction of the repulsive force.

ETA: Thee is also the consideration that some other force would need to be generated within a finite field to counteract gravitational forces in great accelerations away from the gravitational source, in order to avoid turning any potential occupants into a strawberry-colored stain on the inner walls of the object. An acceleration in excess of gravitational acceleration, and opposite it, would tend to mush up biological systems within the object without some counteracting force - but that force would have to be contained in a finite field or "bubble" in order to avoid interfering with the propulsive forces.

.

Your post has given my mind a lot to consider my friend.

I will discuss it with the team this weekend.

After we concluded the red lines outside the craft were gravity clouds, one of us finally had a light bulb go off in their head and wonder what a Black Hole would reveal about gravity and so Picor A was the first project.


More recently we have processed another Black Hole named NUSTAR -