![]() |
|
Jasmine Crockett, A City With No Crime is Racist - Printable Version +- Rogue-Nation Discussion Board (https://rogue-nation.com/mybb) +-- Forum: Controversy and Debate (https://rogue-nation.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=52) +--- Forum: Social Unrest and Justice (https://rogue-nation.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=57) +--- Thread: Jasmine Crockett, A City With No Crime is Racist (/showthread.php?tid=3334) |
Jasmine Crockett, A City With No Crime is Racist - Michigan Swamp Buck - 02-11-2026 Jasmine Crockett, a lawyer and U.S. representative for Texas's 30th congressional district, was supposedly quoted in 2025 as saying the following. "A city with no crime is racist because a city with no crime is a white-dominant city." I can't verify this quote, but just thinking about the convoluted logic involved, I had an epiphany. First, my breakdown of the basic logic.
Therefore . . .
So, the following must be true.
Final Conclusion. Evil Whites are law-abiding citizens, and Good Blacks are lawless criminals. My epiphany. This can only make sense when white laws are entirely racist, making black criminals Robin Hood-like heroes. I actually remember the 70s and the Black Power movement. It was true up through the 60s and 70s about racist laws on the books, especially down south. The blacks in the movement at that time believed that the entire system was created by and for the whites, and was designed to hold the black man down. That was a righteous fight for that time, but they have gained a lot of ground since then. Now, Jasmine Crockett, being a lawyer, must realize that such a stance is pure lawlessness. If this is true, she seems more like an anti-lawyer. I wonder if she would honor laws drafted by black people, or would they be unworthy as "legal Uncle Toms" in her eyes? Are the blacks in the system like house negroes sucking up to their white masters? Would obscure African tribal traditions hold more weight as law here in the States than the U.S Constitution? A factual quote or not, this seems to get down to the brass tacks discovered by the movement since emancipation. They were freed slaves, but that didn't integrate them into the white world until much later. Nowadays, they must be integrated enough for the democrats to leave them for far more marginalized illegals and transsexuals. RE: Jasmine Crockett, A City With No Crime is Racist - gortex - 02-11-2026 Don't know if it's a direct quote but it seems to be the inference in this speech where it looks like everything is racist to this woman ... except for having no white folks standing behind you , that's just natural for an anti white racist. It also seems "Black women somehow became the most educated demographic in this Country" , who knew ? I think we've all learned over the years racism is a one way street , there aint no such thing as racism against white folks. As for her claim black folks are having their healthcare taken from them here's an idea , get a job and pay your way. Guessing that's racist too , sorry. RE: Jasmine Crockett, A City With No Crime is Racist - Michigan Swamp Buck - 02-12-2026 (02-11-2026, 03:05 PM)gortex Wrote: Don't know if it's a direct quote but it seems to be the inference in this speech where it looks like everything is racist to this woman ... except for having no white folks standing behind you , that's just natural for an anti white racist. Naw, it would be racists to suggest that black folks get their tribal medicine men to take care of their sicknesses and demonic possessions and that they pay them with chickens for their services. RE: Jasmine Crockett, A City With No Crime is Racist - Michigan Swamp Buck - 02-12-2026 Obviously, there are logical errors in my breakdown of that statement. This argument needs things defined to even begin to make some sense. City with No Crime = White-Dominant City What is the definition of race dominant, or is it dominated? I want to think that this means that the majority of the population is white and the political power is held by white people. That seems to be the claim that white cities are crime-free, while conversely, the opposite must be true. However, this could mean that even though the city has a low percentage of whites living there, whites are the ones who hold political power, while a majority of non-whites live there without it. Since there are always crimes committed, esp. in cities, then what can be considered to be "no crime"? Is this the same as crime-free? If the standard is the crime statistics of a majority white city verses a majority non-white one, I think that comparison would problematic for this claim. Ultimately I believe crime is related to class and level of income. It is then compounded by the politics. |