|
‘Supercarrier’ and Warship Armada heading to Iran’s Backyard - Printable Version +- Rogue-Nation Discussion Board (https://rogue-nation.com/mybb) +-- Forum: General and Breaking News Events (https://rogue-nation.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=43) +--- Forum: War, Peace or Inbetween (https://rogue-nation.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=46) +--- Thread: ‘Supercarrier’ and Warship Armada heading to Iran’s Backyard (/showthread.php?tid=3307) |
‘Supercarrier’ and Warship Armada heading to Iran’s Backyard - gortex - 01-24-2026 On the face of it more sabre rattling or perhaps gunboat diplomacy from the US but should it go further it seems to me Putin is losing allies quite quickly these days. Quote:Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA – As he was returning to the US from the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, US President Donald Trump told the press aboard Air Force One that an American “armada” is heading toward Iran. That armada is a US carrier strike group led by the USS Abraham Lincoln, which was reported on January 20 as having departed its previously assigned patrol area and was steaming towards the Middle East. If he attacks Iran it could get messy , Iran and China share a comprehensive strategic partnership with China Iran's largest oil consumer. RE: ‘Supercarrier’ and Warship Armada heading to Iran’s Backyard - 727Sky - 01-25-2026 RE: ‘Supercarrier’ and Warship Armada heading to Iran’s Backyard - Ninurta - 01-25-2026 (01-25-2026, 07:40 AM)727Sky Wrote: I couldn't help but notice the similarity between that AI avatar's voice and the voice of the "WOPR" computer in the old "War Games" movie. I personally think his assessment was faulty - he seems to be presuming that any action against Iran would necessarily be predicated on an extended, protracted and drawn out war scenario. I don't think that's the case. I think that a series of surgical strikes would be far more productive, and of a far shorter duration to accomplish the mission. Trump has demonstrated a preference for quick hit-n-git victories over protracted war. The military is repositioning about 25,000 troops into a threatening posture. I think - or at least hope - that is just a "feint"... an intentional ruse to distract attention away from the main assault without intent to carry that particular threat to completion. This is not a case where we need "boots on the ground" - we already have them in place in the form of the Iranian civilians protesting and rioting. All they need is weapons to counter the regime's weapons. they don't need any extra bodies there to get in their way. We don't need any more "boots on the ground" there, but making the regime THINK that such an invasion action is imminent would cause them to prepare more for an attack that never comes, shifting preparation away from an attack that DOES come. About a week and a half ago or so, a KC-135 flying gas station was, briefly, actually IN the airspace of Iran. No idea what that was about. A few days after that, drones were flying patrols all up and down the Iranian coast along the axis of the Persian Gulf. If I had to guess, I'd say they were mapping out coastal anti-air sites, marking them for future destruction. The intent of that would be to give our air power a freer hand in executing surgical strikes rather than protracted war. While those strikes were going on, it would be prudent to air-drop weapons for the protesters to put to use against the regime. And, all of that could be accomplished without a single boot on the ground that isn't already there now, other than the possibility of a snatch operation to capture and secure the ayatollah and perhaps a few more ranking honchos in the regime. The Iranian people themselves could mop up the rest and topple the regime on their own, assuming the possession of airdropped weaponry in the form of small arms and perhaps mortars, with perhaps a few strafing runs from western sources as air support. We don't need extra troops there - we're not trying to gain and hold ground, we're trying to help the Iranians to regain and hold ground that is already theirs, not ours. All they want is help, and that doesn't mean they want US troopers on the ground there. It means there is infrastructure they need us to disassemble from the air to make their own victory easier. . RE: ‘Supercarrier’ and Warship Armada heading to Iran’s Backyard - babushka - 01-26-2026 We don't know all the players, other forces could be looking to move in. I imagine Iran has dirt on every corrupt government that is supporting them across the globe and will call in favors. When the rest of the world shuns you go to Iran apparently. There is also local groups. Just dropping guns for the locals won't do. I think if the US does nothing at this point those people will have hatred towards the west forever. I rate the US is forced to make a move now, it's unavoidable. RE: ‘Supercarrier’ and Warship Armada heading to Iran’s Backyard - Ninurta - 01-26-2026 Correct. Just dropping guns will not do. They also need air support, and possibly a raid or a few to capture honchos. What they absolutely DON'T need are troops in the fray. The Iranians are entirely capable of fighting for themselves, if properly armed. They don't need outsiders coming in to "cheapen" their victory, outsiders who will try to take more credit than is due for their interference. I also believe that if the US doesn't do what it has promised - deliver some help - that it will solidify a hatred from the Iranian people towards the west. Trying to snatch credit for their victory away from them would do the same. I seriously doubt that either China or Russia would do a damned thing, not any more than they did for Venezuela. Russia is too broke and occupied in the Ukraine, and China is not willing to risk losing face to the US again in a war they could not win in Iran. They already took enough of a beating in Venezuela to do them. They wouldn't risk that humiliation again for the likes of the Mad Mullahs. . RE: ‘Supercarrier’ and Warship Armada heading to Iran’s Backyard - babushka - 01-26-2026 frontlines would be Venezuela, Ukraine and Iran. I don't think either the US or Russia is worried at this stage about larger conflict breaking out. More proxy wars, idk. lots of terror actions in europe and aus/nz to come and riots elsewhere i think Guess we need to watch Taiwan, or is China going to sit behind russia forever. Taking Taiwan now would also give them a frontline away. I think they need it anyways because they are boxed in or something RE: ‘Supercarrier’ and Warship Armada heading to Iran’s Backyard - Kenzo1 - 02-21-2026 Got this from x : The Iran Watcher Quote:This message is spreading across Iranian social media, allegedly from a security insider exposing what are the Islamic Republic’s sinister plans in the event of a U.S. attack. “As someone working within the security forces who cannot reveal my identity for security reasons, I felt it necessary to share this very important information with the public. I could see the above could really happen , doing the same Palestinian playbook to play victimhood . RE: ‘Supercarrier’ and Warship Armada heading to Iran’s Backyard - Shredded Feat - 02-21-2026 Hello Rogue Nation! I just joined and I am checking to see if I am able to Reply to Threads in here. And while I am at it, the situation with Iran/Israel/USA is certainly concerning due to the potential for extreme escalation. RE: ‘Supercarrier’ and Warship Armada heading to Iran’s Backyard - Kenzo1 - 02-22-2026 I have some doubts willthe coming military force against Iran eventually work . It`s large country ,roughly about 2.5 times bigger than Afghanistan. Without boots on the ground the regime may keep their seats . With boot on the ground , the US / Israel casualtys might get way bigger than predicted ? Mountains .....they have a lot that there . Rumour says ,Benjamin Netanjahu sayed " if you dont attack iran now, we will use nuclear weapons against iran " And then there is the wag the dog ( Epstein ) Quote:The phrase 'Wag the Dog' is used to indicate that attention is purposely being diverted from something of greater importance to something of lesser importance RE: ‘Supercarrier’ and Warship Armada heading to Iran’s Backyard - EndtheMadnessNow - 02-22-2026 I think the coup d'état has already been in progress since last June with special operators inside Iran that may/will cause the regime to implode and the IRGC to stand down. The US military build-up is a contingency plan if things go wrong and/or a coup de grâce if the implosion works. Who knows what the Israelis have been up to. Like Ninurta said, Trump is all about quick in & out like Syria, Yemen, Venezuela. I'm sure it'll be a surprise on how it goes down. I could be totally wrong, time will tell. Tick-tock. Very few read US policy papers (very boring) from prestigious think-tanks and this one from 2009 Brookings Institution analysis paper "Which Path to Persia" shows the USGov continuity of agenda is perhaps been playing out according to the plan. ![]() WHICH PATH TO PERSIA? (PDF, 170 pages) Then there are a few in Washington and Tel Aviv that prefer the final solution. ![]() 10.4 megaton airburst over Tehran RE: ‘Supercarrier’ and Warship Armada heading to Iran’s Backyard - Kenzo1 - 02-22-2026 (02-22-2026, 07:02 AM)EndtheMadnessNow Wrote: I think the coup d'état has already been in progress since last June with special operators inside Iran that may/will cause the regime to implode and the IRGC to stand down. The US military build-up is a contingency plan if things go wrong and/or a coup de grâce if the implosion works. Who knows what the Israelis have been up to. Like Ninurta said, Trump is all about quick in & out like Syria, Yemen, Venezuela. I'm sure it'll be a surprise on how it goes down. I could be totally wrong, time will tell. Tick-tock. Whoe knows what are the plans yeeh.. But regarding Venezuela , not very convincing to me , after all the chavisma regime is intact , only top figure Maduro out.....but it was build to cope / adaptation to loosing top dog . Sure they make deal with US to stay in power . But then what`s the picture ? We are talking about brutal regime in Venezuela Quote:[*]The report identified 18,093 extrajudicial executions carried out by state security forces or ‘colectivos’ since 2014.[*] OAS Report on Maduro Regime: 18,000 Extrajudicial Executions, Hundreds of Torture Cases Maduro Is Gone. Venezuela’s Regime Remains quick in & out means regarding Venezuela that this brutal regime stayed in power . Sounds more like Trumps business deals approach. RE: ‘Supercarrier’ and Warship Armada heading to Iran’s Backyard - Kenzo1 - 02-24-2026 Look`s like the most expensive carrier USS Gerald R. Ford has major toilet/sevage issues . To some degree i can understand it.....but what i dont understand why they send it to this mission then as U.S have 11 nuclear-powered aircraft carriers to choose. Here`s the easy solution : Or...solution #2 RE: ‘Supercarrier’ and Warship Armada heading to Iran’s Backyard - putnam6 - 02-24-2026 (02-24-2026, 12:53 PM)Kenzo1 Wrote: Look`s like the most expensive carrier USS Gerald R. Ford has major toilet/sevage issues . To some degree i can understand it.....but what i dont understand why they send it to this mission then as U.S have 11 nuclear-powered aircraft carriers to choose. In and out.... wham bam thank you, ma'am. AND ONLY assist IF confidence is extremely high for success Discord seems to think after SOTU |