Quote:Trump Yanks Security Clearances Of Intel Officials Who Spread Disinformation About Hunter Biden’s Laptop
By: Shawn Fleetwood
January 20, 2025
3 min read


  Image CreditLiam Enea/Wikimedia Commons/CC BY-SA 2.0

Share

• Share Article on Facebook
  
• Share Article on Twitter
  
• [/url]
  

[*]Share Article on Truth Social
[*]

• [email=?subject=Trump Yanks Security Clearances Of Intel Officials Who Spread Disinformation About Hunter Biden’s] Share Article via Email [/email]
  
• 
  

President Donald Trump signed an [url=https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/holding-former-government-officials-accountablefor-election-interference-and-improper-disclosure-of-sensitive-governmental-information/]executive order on Monday night revoking the security clearances of 51 former intelligence officials who falsely claimed emails from Hunter Biden’s laptop were Russian “disinformation” to help Joe Biden’s 2020 election prospects. The directive also pulls the security clearance of John Bolton, who served as national security advisor in Trump’s first term.
“To remedy these abuses of the public trust, this Order directs the revocation of any active or current security clearances held by: (i) the former intelligence officials who engaged in misleading and inappropriate political coordination with the 2020 Biden presidential campaign; and (ii) John R. Bolton,” the order reads.
The infamous Oct. 19, 2020, letter included signatures from dozens of former intel officials who baselessly contended the emails from Hunter’s laptop that were reported by the New York Post weeks before the 2020 contest bore “all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.” Biden then weaponized the phony statement during his Oct. 22, 2020, debate against Trump to dispel the latter’s criticisms of the Biden family’s foreign business dealings.
Former CIA Directors John Brennan and Leon Panetta and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper were among those to sign the letter.
Under Monday’s edict, the directors of National Intelligence and the CIA are ordered to submit a report within 90 days to Trump that includes “any additional inappropriate activity that occurred within the Intelligence Community, by anyone contracted by the Intelligence Community or by anyone who held a security clearance, related to the letter signed by the 51 former intelligence officials.”
This report must also detail any and all “recommendations to prevent the Intelligence Community or anyone who works for or within it from inappropriately influencing domestic elections” and “any disciplinary action — including the termination of security clearances — that should be taken against anyone who engaged in inappropriate conduct related to the letter signed by the 51 former intelligence officials.”
Congressional investigations into the infamous letter and its signatories in the years since the 2020 election have revealed that these intel officials did not act alone in attempting to delegitimize the New York Post’s findings on the Biden family.
In April 2023, House Republicans released testimony from Michael Morell, a former deputy director of the CIA who signed onto the letter, revealing that “on or around October 17, 2020,” Antony Blinken, a then-Biden campaign official who later became secretary of state, “reached out to him to discuss the Hunter Biden laptop story,” which the Post published on Oct. 14.
According to Morell, Blinken’s outreach “set in motion the events that led to the issuance of the public statement” that baselessly asserted the laptop was part of a Russian disinformation campaign. When pressed by House investigators if he had any intent to write the statement prior to Blinken’s call, Morell said he “did not,” confirming the call “absolutely” pushed him to write it.
Morell also affirmed in his congressional testimony that there were two motives for releasing the statement, one being for former intel officials to share their alleged “concern[s] with the American people that the Russians were playing on this issue.” The other was to “help Vice President Biden.”
“You wanted to help the vice president, why?” asked Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, to which Morell replied, “Because I wanted him to win the election.”
An email included in a February 2024 lawsuit filed by America First Legal shows Morell soliciting signatures from intel officials prior to the letter’s release, confirming The Federalist’s reporting about the CIA’s heavy-handed role in its development.

(01-18-2025, 03:52 PM)F2d5thCav Wrote: Without trying to get too ideological in this comment, my take is that historians in the future will not look back kindly on either the election of 2020 or Biden's administration.

There are one Hell of a lot of people with skin in the game concerning what went down in 2020, and they are blowing as much smoke as they can for as long as they can.

Cheers

Quote: White House
Trump fires independent inspectors general in Friday night purge
The watchdogs say the removals may be invalid for failing to comply with a 2022 law requiring a 30-day notification to Congress before removals.

       



A senior White House official confirmed to POLITICO that “some” inspectors general had been fired. | Mark Schiefelbein/AP
By Megan Messerly, Josh Gerstein, Kyle Cheney and Nahal Toosi
01/25/2025 09:07 AM EST
Updated: 01/25/2025 09:20 PM EST

President Donald Trump fired multiple independent federal watchdogs, known as inspectors general, in a Friday night purge, removing a significant layer of accountability as he asserts his control over the federal government in his second term, according to two people with knowledge of the dismissals, granted anonymity to share details they were not authorized to speak about publicly.
The ousters set up what will likely be one of Trump’s first major court battles since taking office. At least one of the fired inspectors general — the State Department’s Cardell Richardson Sr. — has told staff he plans to show up to work on Monday, arguing that the firings are illegal, according to a person familiar with the situation who requested anonymity to reveal the internal discussions. A State Department spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment.
One of the two people briefed on the dismissals said the number is at least a dozen and includes inspectors general at the departments of State, Agriculture, Interior, Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, Education, Labor and Defense, as well as the Small Business Administration, the Department of Energy, and the Environmental Protection Agency.


Together, those agencies make up large swaths of the federal government, with control over billions of dollars in taxpayer money and broad global reach.
The inspectors general at the Department of Justice, Office of Personnel Management, the Federal Communications Commission, the Export-Import Bank and the Department of Homeland Security remain in place, according to the person.
The inspectors general were dismissed via emails from the White House Presidential Personnel Office, with no notice sent to lawmakers on Capitol Hill, who have pledged bipartisan support for the watchdogs, in advance of the firings, the person said. The emails gave no substantive explanation for the dismissals, with at least one citing “changing priorities” for the move, the person added.
A senior White House official confirmed to POLITICO that “some” inspectors general had been fired.

 
Trump, speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One Saturday evening, said that he didn’t know the inspectors general who were dismissed but that “some people thought that some were unfair, or some were not doing the job,” and maintained that the firings were “a very common thing to do.”
Asked whether he planned to install loyalists in those positions, Trump said that he didn’t “know anybody that would do that.”
“We’ll put people in there that will be very good,” he said.
Hannibal Ware, the inspector general of the Small Business Administration and leader of a council that represents inspectors general across government, suggested that the removals may be invalid because they appear to violate federal law requiring a 30-day notification to Congress before any watchdogs can be removed.
“I recommend that you reach out to White House Counsel to discuss your intended course of action,” Ware wrote in a letter obtained by POLITICO to Sergio Gor, the director of the White House Office of Presidential Personnel. “At this point, we do not believe the actions taken are legally sufficient to dismiss Presidentially Appointed, Senate Confirmed Inspectors General.”
Diana Shaw, a former acting inspector general at the State Department, said the dismissals were “the travesty we feared may be coming.”
“If legal, and I think that’s an open question under the law requiring 30-day congressional notification prior to the firing of an IG, it risks changing forever what we have historically valued most about IGs — their independence, objectivity, and non-partisanship,” Shaw said. “Without it, the function would be gutted of its greatest value and the entire system will suffer.”
MOST READ

[/url]
   

1. Some advocates for inspectors general said they were baffled by the Trump White House’s choices of whom to dismiss. Several of those who were fired were appointed by Trump and at least one — Sean O’Donnell at the EPA — was perceived as closely allied with Trump by Democrats, who sharply criticized his conduct.
   
   

The status of DOJ’s inspector general, Michael Horowitz, has been most closely watched by advocates for the watchdogs because of his long tenure and the sensitivity of the matters his office has investigated.
An Obama appointee who assumed the IG post in 2012, Horowitz recently released sensitive reports detailing the Justice Department’s efforts to access call and email logs of congressional staffers and journalists, as well as on the FBI’s use of confidential human sources on Jan. 6, 2021. Horowitz also drew intense scrutiny over reports that catalogued the FBI’s handling of its investigation of Trump and his 2016 campaign’s contacts with Russia, as well as Hillary Clinton’s handling of classified information on a private email server.
While people familiar with the moves said Horowitz appeared to have survived the culling Friday, a spokesperson for his office declined to comment on the developments.
Trump told reporters Saturday that he thought Horowitz’s report on former FBI Director James Comey’s missteps in the bureau’s investigation into Russia’s attempts to influence Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign was “incredible actually” and “such an accurate well-done report.”

 
Trump’s brazen move provides an early test for Congress, less than a week into Trump’s return to office, and in particular to Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) who has long championed the independence of inspectors general. And it shows how willing the president is to stretch the limits of his authority to dismantle the federal government bureaucracy that he and his allies label the “deep state.”
It also presents a test for Trump’s new Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who was narrowly confirmed by the Senate Friday night, with the Defense Department’s inspector general among those dismissed. Hegseth, in response to written questions from Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) during the confirmation process, said that he would “commit to protecting the DoD IG’s independence,” according to a document reviewed by POLITICO.
Inspectors general are tasked with ridding the government of waste, fraud and abuse, one of Trump’s stated goals. But he has remained long suspicious of federal government officials who he blames with stymieing action during his first term in office. Trump’s early picks for top government jobs show the value he is placing on loyalty above all else.
But even many Republicans celebrate the role of these watchdogs in protecting taxpayer interests and providing a check on the consolidation of administrative power.
Grassley [url=https://www.politico.com/news/2024/11/25/trump-inspectors-general-watchdogs-00191381]told POLITICO in November that Trump shouldn’t pursue a broad ouster of inspectors general.

 
“I guess it’s the case of whether he believes in congressional oversight, because I work closely with all the inspector generals and I think I’ve got a good reputation for defending them. And I intend to defend them,” he said.
He struck a more measured tune Saturday morning, saying in a statement that there “may be a good reason the IGs were fired” and that he would like “further explanation” from Trump about the dismissals. But, he added, Congress was still not given the 30-day notice required by law.
Trump’s decision caught other Senate Republicans off guard as well, with several indicating when they arrived for a rare weekend session that they either hadn’t gotten a heads up from the White House or hadn’t heard of Trump’s actions.
“I don’t understand why one would fire individuals whose mission is to root out waste, fraud and abuse. So this leaves a gap in what I know is a priority for President Trump,” said GOP Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine).
But many of her colleagues shrugged off Trump’s decision, acknowledging that they needed more information but largely weren’t concerned.
“He’s the boss …We need to clean house,” said Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.).
The slew of firings prompted immediate outcry from several Democratic members of Congress.

 
Warren, in a post on X Saturday morning, said that Trump is “dismantling checks on his power and paving the way for widespread corruption.” Rep. Gerald Connolly (D-Va.), ranking member of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, in a statement called the move a “Friday night coup” and an “attack on transparency and accountability.”
Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) called Trump’s actions “a glaring sign that it’s a Golden Age for abuse in government and even corruption.”
“These firings are Donald Trump’s way of telling us he is terrified of accountability and is hostile to facts and to transparency,” he said on the Senate floor Saturday. “They’re the ones who tell the truth and shine a light on bad behavior.”